Re: [asterisk-users] Discussion: Are we ready to leave 1.4 behind?

2011-04-27 Thread Matteo Piazza

I agree 100%, it's too early.
There is a lot of businnes out of there based on 1.4 (even still 1.2), 
and my feelings is that a lot of people is not going to upgrade the 
asterisk version, they are going to stay with 1.4 for a long time yet.


Also i wanna add another little consideration. Voip is not only a 
software matter, is a Telecomunication matter. And into the 
Telecomunication world the first priority is the reliability and 
reliability and reliability without forget that usually the lifetime of 
a telecomunicaton product is much more than 4 years.


I'm not a code writer so I can't put my effort in maintaince stuff.

I think 1.4 should be open at least for some critical bug like for 
example segmentation fault or memory leack.

Matteo


Il 27/04/2011 21:34, Olle E. Johansson ha scritto:

Friends,

We have a discussion on asterisk-dev about the maintenance of the 1.4 branch. 
According to the release plans, support for 1.4 was scheduled to close in April 
2011 - basically now. After that, only security patches would be committed. 
This is already a delay from the original plan published by Russell Bryant.

Unfortunately, I think this is way too early. My feeling and experience is that 
1.8 is not ready for production in the environments I work in - large scale 
installations. Customers are not planning migration and all new installs are 
still 1.4. Tests we've been doing with 1.8 has failed within just a short time 
and so badly that customers has not paid me to spend any further time with 1.8.

Last time we went through this process with a LTS release (which we did not 
know then) it took over one year before we had a stable product to migrate away 
from 1.2 and jump on the 1.4 track. Hopefully, with the help of community, we 
can move up to 1.8 late this year or early next year. For me 1.8 is the focus, 
it's the LTS release.

Not having a supported 1.4 version from the Digium-hosted repositories will 
mean that we will have to move to separate repositories or branch off from the 
main track. I already maintain a ton of subversion branches with various 
patches to 1.4 It takes a lot of time to manage this version that is a fork 
from the main 1.4 branch. I will soon have to start working with subversion 
branches for 1.8 to create a compatible version for my customers to test, since 
most of the patches is not part of 1.8. After a few years of doing this, I know 
the work involved with managing code myself.

The Digium team wants to go ahead and not support 1.4 any more, I want to keep 
1.4 open for normal bug fixes. What do you think?

Kevin proposed that the community maintains the 1.4 branch without support from 
the Digium team. I don't think that's a good solution, but it may be the only 
solution.  I haven't got the resources to manage the 1.4 code myself, so I 
won't step forward as a maintainer if I can't get proper funding. Anyone else 
out there that has the time and resources to manage the code?

Feel free to send me mail off list if you have ideas or suggestions on how to 
solve this - or continue the discussion here.

Regards,
/Olle

PS. Please don't start a discussion about 1.8 quality in this thread, that's a 
separate issue. I just want to know what you think about closing 1.4 support 
now. If you want to discuss 1.8 quality, start a new thread. Thanks.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Unable to set callerid for incoming skype calls

2010-06-22 Thread Matteo Piazza
HI,

I'm using the usual Set(Callerid(num) function to change the incoming 
from skype callerid but it's not working.

Asterisk 1.4.31 and last release of skype channels


This is the dialplan

exten = _0X.,1,NoOP(${CALLERID(num)} - ${CALLERID(name)})
exten = _0X.,n,Set(STRINGA=Skype)
exten = _0X.,n,NoOP(${STRINGA})
exten = _0X.,n,Set(CALLERID(num) = ${STRINGA})
exten = _0X.,n,NoOP(${CALLERID(num)} - ${CALLERID(name)})

and is the output
NoOp(Skype/lab.trentinonetwork.it-08a32278, mapiazza - Matteo 
Piazza) in new stack
 -- Executing [0461020...@dial-to-openser:2] 
Set(Skype/lab.trentinonetwork.it-08a32278, STRINGA=Skype) in new stack
 -- Executing [0461020...@dial-to-openser:3] 
NoOp(Skype/lab.trentinonetwork.it-08a32278, Skype) in new stack
 -- Executing [0461020...@dial-to-openser:4] 
Set(Skype/lab.trentinonetwork.it-08a32278, CALLERID(num) = Skype) in 
new stack
 -- Executing [0461020...@dial-to-openser:5] 
NoOp(Skype/lab.trentinonetwork.it-08a32278, mapiazza - Matteo 
Piazza) in new stack

As you can see the incoming callerid(num) mapiazza doesn't change.

Is there any limitation on skype channel ?

Matteo


-- 
==
Ing. Matteo Piazza
Trentino Network s.r.l.
Area Ricerca  Sviluppo
Via Gilli, 2 - 38121 TRENTO
Tel (+39) 0461.020224
Mob (+39) 335.5378482
Fax (+39) 0461.020201
Cap. Soc. sottoscritto  7.573.248,00 - i. v.
REG. IMP. C.F. e P. IVA 01904880224
Società soggetta a direzione e controllo da parte della Provincia
Autonoma di Trento. C.F. e P. IVA 00337460224
==


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] SRV DNS failover - dial to proxy list

2008-10-08 Thread Matteo Piazza
I'm looking for some documentationof the implementation of the SRV DNS 
on asterisk. I'm using asterisk 1.4.22.

1) From voip-info.org: Currently, Asterisk only reads the first SRV 
entry without bothering with priorities and weights.
IS It still true? from my first tests I can see that asterisk is able to 
manage more than only the first SRV

2) I wanna configure the asterisk in this way: if the proxy with the 
highest priority is not reachable, IT tries to dial through the next 
proxy defined in the zone with a SRV record.


In my dialplan I have:
exten = _0461.,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED])

the asterisk recieve this answer at the DNS query
Domain Name System (response)
[Request In: 1]
[Time: 0.000352000 seconds]
Transaction ID: 0x989a
Flags: 0x8580 (Standard query response, No error)
Questions: 1
Answer RRs: 2
Authority RRs: 1
Additional RRs: 3
Queries
_sip._udp.gorizia.tnet.it: type SRV, class IN
Name: _sip._udp.gorizia.tnet.it
Type: SRV (Service location)
Class: IN (0x0001)
Answers
_sip._udp.gorizia.tnet.it: type SRV, class IN, priority 0, 
weight 0, port 5060, target load.gorizia.tnet.it
_sip._udp.gorizia.tnet.it: type SRV, class IN, priority 1, 
weight 0, port 5060, target failover.gorizia.tnet.it
Authoritative nameservers
gorizia.tnet.it: type NS, class IN, ns ns1.gorizia.tnet.it
Additional records
load.gorizia.tnet.it: type A, class IN, addr 172.25.18.68
failover.gorizia.tnet.it: type A, class IN, addr 172.25.18.65
ns1.gorizia.tnet.it: type A, class IN, addr 172.25.18.68

 From the asterisk console I have:
[2008-10-08 13:34:15] -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] 
Dial(SIP/tnn2678-08277a20, SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in new stack
[2008-10-08 13:34:15] -- ast_get_srv: SRV lookup for 
'_sip._udp.gorizia.tnet.it' mapped to host load.gorizia.tnet.it, port 5060
[2008-10-08 13:34:15] -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]

the load.gorizia.tnet.it is not reachable but asterisk is stuck here.

Any one have any clue?
Thanks for your time.
Matteo


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Max Number of Extensions

2006-05-19 Thread Matteo Piazza

Hi,
I have a problem with the extensions file, asterisk load only 412 
extensions. I use 1.2.4. version of Asterisk, I have try to modify the 
extensions but asterisk finish to load the extensions when arrived at 
the 412th extension.


Matteo Piazza


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Problem with poud key (#)

2006-03-14 Thread Matteo Piazza
I not understand why my asterisk send the tone of pound key (#) only 
when i click twice time.

I deactivate the transfer function.
Matteo

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SPA-941 hint

2006-02-17 Thread Matteo Piazza

Hi
Have someome a solution to use the hint function to have the signalling 
of the status of a extension on the SPA-941 phone ?

Matteo
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] double ringing tone on asterisk 1.2 (workaround)

2006-02-01 Thread Matteo Piazza

You must change in the indication.conf the country

[general]
country=it  ; default location




Simone Cittadini wrote:
After reading a description of apparently the same problem by Juan J. 
Sierralta more detailed than mine
tuuu tuuu instead of tuuu we've solved the problem changing the call 
progress tone of sip phones to something not udible.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] messages of Mobile Operator

2005-12-20 Thread Matteo Piazza

Hi,
I have this problem. When I call a GSM number with the IDSN line if the 
GSM phone I not hear the messages of operator  but I hear the ring.
I suppose that the problem is that asterisk waits a response that is yet 
arrived.

Any idea?
This is my extension:
exten = _0XX.,1,Wait,1
exten = _0XX.,2,Dial(Zap/g1/${EXTEN:1},60,tT)
exten = _0XX.,3,Hangup

Matteo
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] remove asterisk?

2005-11-15 Thread Matteo Piazza

Is there a command to remove completely asterisk?
I want clean the server before the installation of 1.2 version.
Matteo
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] remove asterisk?

2005-11-15 Thread Matteo Piazza

Are you sure that with make unistall all asterisk's three is cancelled?


Martin Vit wrote:

make uninstall?

Matteo Piazza wrote:


Is there a command to remove completely asterisk?
I want clean the server before the installation of 1.2 version.
Matteo
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




--
===
 Matteo Piazza, Junior Researcher
 CREATE-NET
 Via Solteri, 38 - 38100 Trento - Italy
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tel: +39-0461-408400ext:308
 www.create-net.it
===
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] MeetMe invite another user

2005-11-09 Thread Matteo Piazza
If I use meetme conference room, can I invite another user during a 
conversation?

In which way?
Matteo
===
 Matteo Piazza, Junior Researcher
 CREATE-NET
 Via Solteri, 38 - 38100 Trento - Italy
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tel: +39-0461-408400ext:308
 www.create-net.it
===
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users