Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Mike Leddy
period: 10.013 s 10014, 9027 modprobe init_module (dahdi_dummy_hr_int) I will test it on a live E1 soon. Best regards, Mike On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 16:53 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mike Leddy m...@loop.com.br wrote: Hi Eric

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Mike Leddy
Hi Russ, I rebooted the machine loading dahdi_dummy in /etc/modules before the /etc/init.d/dahdi. Now dahdi_test shows a nearly perfect score: # dahdi_test Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy... 99.998% 99.990% 99.998% 99.996% 99.998% 99.998% 99.997% 99.997% 99.998% 99.997%

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Mike Leddy
at 10:13 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Mike Leddy m...@loop.com.br wrote: --- Results after 72 passes --- Best: 99.401% -- Worst: 69.357% -- Average: 90.260025% Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 92.402 I suspect it may

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Mike Leddy
] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: Alarm (4) on D-channel of span 1 [May 15 17:36:25] NOTICE[4017] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: Alarm (4) on D-channel of span 1 Best regards, Mike On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 17:53 +0100, Gareth Blades wrote: On 15/05/14 16:28, Mike Leddy wrote: Hi Russ, I rebooted

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-14 Thread Mike Leddy
of ideas. Please help. Thanks, Mike On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 17:56 -0300, Mike Leddy wrote: Thanks again Russ, Just a quick reply for now. No virtualization, but yes I am running a tickless kernel: # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_NO_HZ=y Standard for debian kernels. I booted

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-14 Thread Mike Leddy
. Do you have an actual T-1 plugged into your card? If not, try that and see if there is any difference. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mike Leddy Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 3

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-13 Thread Mike Leddy
% --- Results after 40 passes --- Best: 89.559% -- Worst: 88.573% -- Average: 89.052215% Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 89.052 Still experimenting. Best regards, Mike On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 17:23 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Mike Leddy m

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-13 Thread Mike Leddy
to read up a bit more on the subject and look at possible power saving issues on this machine. Best regards, Mike On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 15:26 -0500, Russ Meyerriecks wrote: On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Mike Leddy m...@loop.com.br wrote: But on examination the /etc/init.d/dahdi

[asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-12 Thread Mike Leddy
Hello, I am trying to get a Wildcard TE110P to work in a relatively modern HP Proliant DL385p Gen8 server. Being a potent 12 core Opteron server I expected no problems. Much to my dismay the dahdi_test results are constantly terrible: # dahdi_test Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring