Re: [asterisk-users] seeking hardware recommendation PCI versus PCI Express E1 card (te407p vs te420bf)

2008-08-18 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Jay R. Ashworth wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:06:58PM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Keep in mind that even if you use 4 E1 circuits with the card, the total bandwidth consumption of card is approximately 1 megabyte per second (4 times 2 megabits per second), which is drastically below

Re: [asterisk-users] seeking hardware recommendation PCI versus PCI Express E1 card (te407p vs te420bf)

2008-08-14 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Rajesh Kumar Mallah wrote: to summarise is TE407P in anyway inferior to TE420BF Card ? does TE407P saturate the 33mhz PCI bus when all voice channels are used ? There is no effective performance difference between using the PCI-X and PCI-E

[asterisk-users] seeking hardware recommendation PCI versus PCI Express E1 card (te407p vs te420bf)

2008-08-13 Thread Rajesh Kumar Mallah
channels are used ? The most new mobos are having 5.0V PCI slots , PCI x1 and x16 slots, so if i buy te407p i test it with the old ibm x220 server and if need be i can use it with the newer mobos. regds Rajesh Kumar Mallah. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation

RE:[Asterisk-Users] free dids on goiax.com

2005-10-18 Thread Rajesh kumar
I have been using goiax for my outgoing and has been excellent in quality ofvoice and also the service.To put the abusers out, I propose that each account holder shouldpre-register the phone numbers they typically call. For a legitimate user,pre-registration is certainly acceptable

Re: RE:[Asterisk-Users] free dids on goiax.com

2005-10-18 Thread Rajesh kumar
Making lists of who you are going to call defeats the purpose. If I only wanted to call a small number of people I wouldnt need US48 termination. If I have to upload a contact list (or enter it manually which would be a lot more bothersome) I wouldnt use the service. The reason for that is I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice Outages?

2005-10-13 Thread Rajesh kumar
Seems like my BYOD-Lite incoming has been working without any interruptions... I don't know about the outgoing; i use different service for that. rajesh - Original Message - From: Thameem Ansari To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: faxing to/from asterisk - new scripts

2005-10-07 Thread Rajesh kumar
Please send them to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] regards, Rajesh - Original Message - From: Technical Support To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com ; 'Roman' Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:54 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: faxing to/from asterisk - new scripts

Re: [Asterisk-Users] system crash

2005-10-06 Thread Rajesh kumar
I used to have similar problem; after spending a lotof time playing around the inerrupts with no luck, i simply went to BIOS and disabled all USB and other unused ports (my * server is dedicated one). MyX100 clone also had a conflict with myethernet card (TDM based? ), and I had to replace

Re: [Asterisk-Users] sip phones on x86_64

2005-10-03 Thread Rajesh kumar
I am using Kphone which works great for my purposes! You can look at twinklephone as well at http://www.twinklephone.com/ rajesh - Original Message - From: Wayne Gemmell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:11 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users]

[Asterisk-Users] Fax with asterisk

2005-09-30 Thread Rajesh kumar
Hi I did install-pdf to receive fax and configured AMP (Extension of fax machine for receiving faxes = system) to send it as an email attachment. However, when i try to send the fax, sending fax machine gets the * digital receptionist and doesn't accept the fax. it keeps prompting with options