[asterisk-users] sip_write warning when executing Pickup of CAPI

2006-12-05 Thread Tom Fanning
I'm trying to pick up a ringing SIP phone (203) across the office with

 

exten = *9,1,Pickup(783743)

 

where 783743 is the local part of the number that our ISDN works on.

 

I tried all of these first:

exten = *9,1,Pickup(203)

exten = *9,1,Pickup(SIP/203)

exten = *9,1,Pickup([EMAIL PROTECTED])

and got a declined message back from my phone (snom 300), so I then
switched to picking up the ringing ISDN line (it's BT ISDN2e on a pair of
Eicon Diva BRI-2M cards)

 

The Pickup(783743) works (the phone across the room stops ringing), but the
calling party gets a nasty distorted noise back down the phone, and I get
dozens of these messages:

 

Dec  5 11:37:50 WARNING[26972]: chan_sip.c:2561 sip_write: Asked to transmit
frame type 64, while native formats is 4 (read/write = 64/64)

 

Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? Asterisk is 1.2.11 on Debian with
2.6.8-2-686 kernel.

 

Thanks

Tom

 

 

 

 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Tom Fanning
Agreed, those are the figures we were able to get 
from Digium... I'm still waiting for a confirmation, 
but I'm being safe with a $4k estimate.. 
snip

What's so special about Digium cards that makes them this expensive? $4000
for a PCB is extortion IMO!

Tom

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] does asterisk work with other processors

2005-06-02 Thread Tom Fanning
 I have tried numerous versions of asterisk from asterisk at home to 
 compiling it myself through the cvs server. I don't 
 understand it works 
 fine with the intel p2 box but not the faster via cyrix box. 
 Is it the 
 processor or something?
 

Have a look in the makefile. It might be necessary to set the PROC= line. I
have a VIA Epia board and it is necessary to set PROC=i586 for Asterisk to
run because the kernel thinks it is an i686 - but it does not have the full
i686 instruction set as far as I can tell.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] a simple call to my girlfriend

2005-06-02 Thread Tom Fanning
snip
  P.S. I don't want to use skype (not open standard, it still 
 doens't work well
  in Linux and eats al the time of my old laptop CPU).
 
 Skype would do you the best.
 


Clearly not.

It won't work on his old laptop, will it.

Like someone else suggested I recommend something like freeworlddialup.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Gradwell UK DID + DTMF

2005-05-30 Thread Tom Fanning
Does anyone have a Gradwell UK SIP number successfully receiving DTMF
working with their Asterisk?

If so, please could you post the relevant bits of your config files.

Thanks in advance
Tom

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] UK DID providers

2005-05-28 Thread Tom Fanning
Hi
 
Can anyone provide me with a Manchester (0161) UK DID number, preferably
IAX2 but SIP is ok too, that I can use for my incoming calls? Call volume
will be low.
 
The critical thing is that DTMF must be correctly passed 100% of the time,
unlike Sipgate, my current (free) provider, whose DTMF detection/passing is
not at all reliable, making it useless for a virtual receptionist scenario.
 
I don't mind paying for this service (free is good though...), as long as it
is reasonably less than the cost/rental of another physical BT line in to
our premises.
 
Regards
 
Tom

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] UK DID providers

2005-05-28 Thread Tom Fanning
Thanks for your quick reply.

Do you have experience with them? Does their DTMF work properly? Any chance
of posting the juicy bits of your config files if you use them please?

Cheers!

Tom

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Gavin Hamill
 Sent: 28 May 2005 14:43
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] UK DID providers
 
 On Saturday 28 May 2005 14:31, Tom Fanning wrote:
  Hi
 
  Can anyone provide me with a Manchester (0161) UK DID 
 number, preferably
  IAX2 but SIP is ok too, that I can use for my incoming 
 calls? Call volume
  will be low.
 
 Yeh, Sipgate's price is good (hey you can't argue with £0 
 setup and £0 per 
 month...) but the service is lukewarm- they drop off the 'net 
 a fair amount 
 and some calls just result in an unavailble tone to the 
 caller (no incoming 
 SIP activity).
 
 Try www.gradwell.com for an 0161...
 
 http://www.gradwell.com/voip/ddi-inbound.php
 
 They offer IAX2 recently as well as SIP.
 
 gdh
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID)

2005-05-28 Thread Tom Fanning
snip

 Could you use javascript, or java from within the browser, which is
 both portable, and likely to work on ANY browser
 that way there is no installation as such, just visit the page, and
 leave a browser window open (minimised) which is 'listening' for
 connections ??

Sigh...

Browsers don't listen. They inititiate a connection, process the
requested transaction with the web server, and close the connection. The
simply can't be used to listen for an arbitrary connection.

Actually, I don't think that you are quite right here.

The guy mentioned Java from within the browser. I believe that I am right in
saying that a Java applet should very well be able to listen for tcp
connections as well as udp datagrams. Try this primer:
http://homepages.uel.ac.uk/2795l/pages/javaapps.htm#Class%20ServerSocket%20(
TCP%20Server%20Connections)

Tom

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] CRM integration (was RE: CallerID)

2005-05-28 Thread Tom Fanning
snip
  Browsers don't listen. They inititiate a connection, process the
  requested transaction with the web server, and close the 
  connection. The simply can't be used to listen for an 
  arbitrary connection.
  
  Actually, I don't think that you are quite right here.
  
  The guy mentioned Java from within the browser. I believe 
  that I am right in saying that a Java applet should very well 
  be able to listen for tcp connections as well as udp 
 
 D'oh!
 I had misread the PP's statement and assumed he meant a bareback
 browser window.
 You are, of course, quite right. A Java app could handle this, but we
 are still left with the issue of having to install SOMETHING, 
 even if it
 is a small Java app, on the client to make this work. 

No installation as such, just make sure a Java virtual machine is present on
the machine.

Seconds to load.

I would say that Java would be ideal for an application like this.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Analog Lines

2005-05-24 Thread Tom Fanning
Grandstream Handytone 486 or similar. 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Sean Cook
 Sent: 24 May 2005 21:59
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Analog Lines
 
 I am looking for a cost effective way to drop analog lines from our
 asterisk system to support modems and faxes.  More than would 
 typically
 be done with TDMxxB cards.  
 
 I have looked at going with a T1 interface to Channel Bank, but that
 just seems like a very expensive way to solve this problem.  ($1500 -
 $2000 ).
 
 Any suggestions?
 
 Sean
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] MusicOnHold Loudness/Distortion

2005-05-22 Thread Tom Fanning
snip
 For whatever reason, the music on hold is extremely distorted 
 and loud.
 It didn't used to be this way and I haven't changed anything, yet it
 persists. This is on all the channels we use (SIP, IAX2, Zap, 
 ALSA). Can
 anyone help with this, or has anyone seen this? The mp3s play fine on
 any computer and haven't changed since they did work.
 Those wishing to hear for themselves, feel free to call extension 8800
 at the number/addresses below.
 

Bryce

Your DTMF recognition seems screwed up. I can't get ex 8800, but I can get
the MOH by dialling 80. Found that out by accidently misdialling the wrong
extension. 

There's slight echo on your line too, and the voices sound muddy somehow.

Can't help you with the dodgy MOH, sorry.

Tom

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Boosting Internet Bandwidth for VOIP

2005-05-21 Thread Tom Fanning
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 chawki hammoud
 Sent: 21 May 2005 05:32
 To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Boosting Internet Bandwidth for VOIP
 
 There was errors when I tried to start the script
 recommended by Andrew to boost bandwidth for voip
 
snip
 iptables v1.2.9: Couldn't load match
 `p2p':/lib/iptables/libipt_p2p.so: cannot open shared
 object file: No such file or directory
 
 Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more
 information.
 iptables v1.2.9: Couldn't load match
 `ipp2p':/lib/iptables/libipt_ipp2p.so: cannot open
 shared object file: No such file or directory
 
 Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more
 information.
 iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
 
 Any suggestions?
 

Doesn't look like iptables is installed properly.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Sipgate incoming DTMF

2005-05-11 Thread Tom Fanning
Has anyone found a solution or received anything useful or constructive from
Sipgate UK regarding their problems with incoming DTMF tones being filtered
out of the audio stream but not passed via SIP to Asterisk, rendering IVR
systems useless?

It worked for a while then completely broke
 
Cheers
Tom

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with VIA Chipset

2005-05-11 Thread Tom Fanning
In the asterisk makefile, you need to make sure that the variable PROC ends
up getting set as i586.

Easiest way to do that is to remove all the conditional stuff around the
PROC=xxx statements and just put PROC=i586 in its place.

Works fine then.

The problem I had was that linux thought that the via was an i686 when in
fact the VIA doesn't support all of the i686 instructions, its closer to an
i586, or so google would have me believe. Either way, it works.

Tom


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Armin Lediger
 Sent: 11 May 2005 22:15
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with VIA Chipset
 
 Hi,
 
 I am trying to install asterisk 1.0.7 on a VIA EPIA 5000 
 board - anyone
 of you already managed to do so? I got V1.0.6 running, but 1.0.7 seems
 not to compile.
 
 I don´t want to bother you all with output code of the errors 
 I get when
 I try to compile asterisk; I am just curious if anyone of you made it!
 
 Thanks for a quick reply!
 
 Sincerely,
 Armin Lediger
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Checking for a sound file

2005-04-27 Thread Tom Fanning
 Causes me to wonder a couple of things.
 Why does ANYONE use Outhouse or Outhouse Express? There are many much more
friendly Windows E-mail clients, from Mozilla on down

Tight integration with Exchange 2003. 

Find me an alternative client that is as stable and that has such tight
integration and I'll jump ship immediately.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Illegal instruction (core dumped)

2005-04-17 Thread Tom Fanning
Hi

Grabbed the most recent stable asterisk from CVS as documented here:
http://www.asterisk.org/index.php?menu=download

Didn't bother with zaptel or libpri as I have no Digium hardware nor T1 or
E1.

Did 
make install asterisk; make samples.

Started asterisk with 
asterisk -c 
and it crashes:

.
.
.
Asterisk Dynamic Loader Starting:
  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/modules.conf': Found
 [chan_modem.so] = (Generic Voice Modem Driver)
  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/modem.conf': Found
  == Loading modem driver chan_modem_aopen.so = (A/Open (Rockwell Chipset)
ITU-2 VoiceModem Driver)
  == Registered channel type 'Modem' (Generic Voice Modem Channel Driver)
 [res_musiconhold.so] = (Music On Hold Resource)
  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/musiconhold.conf': Found
  == Registered application 'MusicOnHold'
  == Registered application 'WaitMusicOnHold'
  == Registered application 'SetMusicOnHold'
 [res_adsi.so] = (ADSI Resource)
  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/adsi.conf': Found
Illegal instruction (core dumped)

Build environment is Mandrake 10.1 official. Didn't have this problem on a
Mandrake 10.1 Community box running in vmware - it worked perfectly the
first time.

Putting 
noload = res_adsi.so 
in extensions.conf just causes it to crash elsewhere during the load.

Compilation worked fine except for this lot which came out of stderr. Is
this normal?

In file included from editline.c:18:
term.c: In function `term_move_to_line':
term.c:556: warning: implicit declaration of function `tputs'
term.c:556: warning: implicit declaration of function `tgoto'
term.c: In function `term_set':
term.c:913: warning: implicit declaration of function `tgetent'
term.c:931: warning: implicit declaration of function `tgetflag'
term.c:940: warning: implicit declaration of function `tgetnum'
term.c:943: warning: implicit declaration of function `tgetstr'
term.c:943: warning: passing arg 3 of `term_alloc' makes pointer from
integer without a cast
In file included from editline.c:18:
term.c: In function `term_echotc':
term.c:1441: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
ar: creating libtime.a
frame.c: In function `ast_fr_fdread':
frame.c:360: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
chan_modem_aopen.c: In function `aopen_read':
chan_modem_aopen.c:327: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target type
chan_modem_bestdata.c: In function `bestdata_read':
chan_modem_bestdata.c:375: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from
pointer target type
chan_modem_i4l.c: In function `i4l_read':
chan_modem_i4l.c:446: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target type
chan_iax2.c: In function `__send_command':
chan_iax2.c:3574: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target type
app_mp3.c: In function `mp3_exec':
app_mp3.c:169: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
app_festival.c: In function `send_waveform_to_channel':
app_festival.c:213: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target type
app_nbscat.c: In function `NBScat_exec':
app_nbscat.c:147: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target type
codec_ilbc.c: In function `lintoilbc_sample':
codec_ilbc.c:95: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
codec_ilbc.c: In function `ilbctolin_sample':
codec_ilbc.c:110: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target type
codec_ilbc.c: In function `ilbctolin_frameout':
codec_ilbc.c:128: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target type
codec_ilbc.c: In function `lintoilbc_frameout':
codec_ilbc.c:189: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer
target type
codec_gsm.c: In function `lintogsm_sample':
codec_gsm.c:85: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
codec_gsm.c: In function `gsmtolin_sample':
codec_gsm.c:100: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
codec_gsm.c: In function `gsmtolin_frameout':
codec_gsm.c:118: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
codec_gsm.c: In function `lintogsm_frameout':
codec_gsm.c:203: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target
type
src/decode.c: In function `Postprocessing':
src/decode.c:25: warning: unused variable `ltmp'
src/long_term.c: In function `Long_term_analysis_filtering':
src/long_term.c:855: warning: unused variable `ltmp'
src/long_term.c: In function `Gsm_Long_Term_Synthesis_Filtering':
src/long_term.c:924: warning: unused variable `ltmp'
src/lpc.c: In function `Reflection_coefficients':
src/lpc.c:214: warning: unused variable `ltmp'
src/lpc.c: In function `Quantization_and_coding':
src/lpc.c:322: warning: unused variable `ltmp'
src/preprocess.c: In function `Gsm_Preprocess':
src/preprocess.c:89: warning: unused variable `lsp'
src/preprocess.c:49: warning: unused variable `ltmp'
src/preprocess.c:50: warning: unused variable `utmp'
src/rpe.c: In function `APCM_inverse_quantization':
src/rpe.c:365: warning: unused variable `ltmp'

[Asterisk-Users] RE: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 9, Issue 152

2005-04-17 Thread Tom Fanning
 On April 17, 2005 05:55 am, Tom Fanning wrote:
  Illegal instruction (core dumped)
 
 Sounds like you have compiled asterisk for a processor that is greater 
 than the processor you're running on.  I.e. compiled and told it to use P4

 instructions when you're on a P3, or maybe even told it to use MMX on a
 Via processor...

Have just shoved PROC=i586 in the Makefile along with some commenting to see
what happens. It's compiling right now.

It is indeed on a Via Epia board.

Cheers
Tom

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] RE: Illegal instruction (core dumped)

2005-04-17 Thread Tom Fanning
 On April 17, 2005 05:55 am, Tom Fanning wrote:
  Illegal instruction (core dumped)
 
 Sounds like you have compiled asterisk for a processor that is greater 
 than the processor you're running on.  I.e. compiled and told it to use 
 P4 instructions when you're on a P3, or maybe even told it to use MMX on
 a Via processor...

 Have just shoved PROC=i586 in the Makefile along with some commenting to 
 see what happens. It's compiling right now.

 It is indeed on a Via Epia board.

 Cheers
 Tom

Worked like a charm.  Posting this here for future reference.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users