Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2012-01-01 Thread Elliot Murdock
1.4/10.0? -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 2:33 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] 1.6

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2012-01-01 Thread mattias
Exist asterisk 10.0? -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] För Elliot Murdock Skickat: den 1 januari 2012 13:25 Till: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Ämne: Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-29 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote: I have been running 1.8.7 with a few fixes back ported from the 1.8.8 release candidate for the last 2.5 months. The system processes around 4,000 calls per day over PRIs for 250 Polycom phones. Previously I was running

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-29 Thread Bruce B
Log are being filled with g729 transcoding error in 1.8.7x now :-( I don't dare to test 1.8.8x as it might have something else broken. Unfortunately I can no longer trust the release candidates. Thanks for the input. On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-29 Thread David Backeberg
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: Can somebody point me to an explanation from Kevin or Tzafir or someone else up the food chain explaining the differences/benefits of 1.6/1.8 vs 1.4/10.0? What's the difference between a car released in 2006 versus a car

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-29 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote: Log are being filled with g729 transcoding error in 1.8.7x now :-( I don't dare to test 1.8.8x as it might have something else broken. Unfortunately I can no longer trust the release candidates. Thanks for the input. What

[asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-28 Thread Eric Wieling
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 3:19 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-28 Thread Danny Nicholas
Wieling Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 2:33 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8 -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-28 Thread Jason Parker
On 12/28/2011 03:10 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: Can somebody point me to an explanation from Kevin or Tzafir or someone else up the food chain explaining the differences/benefits of 1.6/1.8 vs 1.4/10.0? Every branch (1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6.0, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.8, 10) of Asterisk contains new

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-28 Thread Danny Nicholas
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jason Parker Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 3:28 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8 On 12/28/2011 03:10 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: Can somebody point me

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-28 Thread Eric Wieling
, December 28, 2011 4:28 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8 On 12/28/2011 03:10 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: Can somebody point me to an explanation from Kevin or Tzafir or someone else up the food chain explaining the differences

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-28 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: I understand the end of life issue. What I fail to understand is that if 1.8 is the Cadillac of Asterisk, why did they make 10.0 and why does 1.8 have so many bugs (just what I read here, not from my actual experience)?

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-28 Thread Bruce B
I have been running 1.8.7 with a few fixes back ported from the 1.8.8 release candidate for the last 2.5 months. The system processes around 4,000 calls per day over PRIs for 250 Polycom phones. Previously I was running 1.6.1.18 with a bunch of back ports for fixes and features. Overall it

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8 version A2Billing

2010-09-29 Thread Vardan Harutyunyan
Hello I have installed a2b 1.4 with Asterisk 1.6 - and working normal. Also have installed a2b 1.7.1 with Asterisk 1.6 - working fine (for me). -- Vardan Harutyunyan, Senior System Administrator Enterprise Incubator Foundation 123 Hovsep Emin Street, Yerevan 0051, Republic of Armenia Tel: +

[asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8 version A2Billing

2010-09-28 Thread bilal ghayyad
Hi All; Anyone has tried to use A2Billing with Asterisk 1.6 and 1.8 to confirm that is working fine and it is same as 1.4? Appreciate ur kindly help. Regards Bilal -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by