[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno if anyone else has seen this yet:
http://www.scmagazine.com/us/news/article/563800/vulnerabilities+put+asteris
k+telephone+systems+risk/
we do not run asterisk (or any other critical services including PBXware) as
root on the host as normal process.
we are using
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:57:02AM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno if anyone else has seen this yet:
http://www.scmagazine.com/us/news/article/563800/vulnerabilities+put+asteris
k+telephone+systems+risk/
we do not run asterisk (or any other critical services
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:57:02AM +0100, Senad Jordanovic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno if anyone else has seen this yet:
http://www.scmagazine.com/us/news/article/563800/vulnerabilities+put+asteris
k+telephone+systems+risk/
we do not run asterisk (or any
On Jun 15, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Colin Anderson wrote:
What's everyone's take on this flaw? Are we going to start seeing port
4569
scans? FWIW, my IDS has not reported anything out of the ordinary,
even on
5060 SIP.
I am much more concerned about clients like Diax that use the IAXclient
Dunno if anyone else has seen this yet:
http://www.scmagazine.com/us/news/article/563800/vulnerabilities+put+asterisk+telephone+systems+risk/
--
Aaron Daniel
Computer Systems Technician
Sam Houston State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(936) 294-4198
___
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 10:16 -0500, Aaron Daniel wrote:
Dunno if anyone else has seen this yet:
And that is perhaps why the current version of Asterisk is 1.2.9.1.
--
Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by
And that's why you have IAX firewalls off if you don't need it, right?
And if you do, you have it firewalled down to the IPs you are
connecting to... sheesh.
On 6/15/06, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 10:16 -0500, Aaron Daniel wrote:
Dunno if anyone else has seen
- Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone see this?
And that's why you have IAX firewalls off if you don't need it, right?
And if you do, you have it firewalled down to the IPs you are
connecting to... sheesh.
On 6/15/06, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006
Hi
Jul 20 16:59:12 WARNING[1242768448]: app_meetme.c:924 conf_run: Unable to
writey
== Spawn extension (voicepulse-outgoing, 8000, 6) exited non-zero on
'SIP/241'
-- Executing Hangup(SIP/241-f931, ) in new stack
I was in a conference and it just hung up on me. This is the 5 time it did
