I've heard comments about the instability of the IAXy (loosing IP, locking
up, etc) . I want to deploy some, in a remote site. The comments on the
instability suggest that the simplest approach is to power-cycle them when
you have problems. The IAXy would only be in use from 3PM to 8 PM. My
Why would someone choose
these over other boxes, such as the Sipura 2000 and 3000?
Also, anyone have experience with the TDM400 FXS module in a ground
start configuration?
Digium has said , from two different support folks that they do not and
do work ground start.
John Novack
Colin
Why would someone choose these over other
boxes, such as the Sipura 2000 and 3000?
Because I want
NAT traversal and a low bandwidth codec. That's the whole point of IAX2 as
opposed to SIP.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Colin Anderson wrote:
Why would someone choose these over other boxes, such as the Sipura 2000
and 3000?
Because I want NAT traversal and a low bandwidth codec. That's the whole
point of IAX2 as opposed to SIP.
The IAXy does not support low bandwidth protocols.
Colin Anderson wrote:
Why
would someone choose these over other boxes, such as the Sipura 2000
and 3000?
Because
I want NAT traversal and a low bandwidth codec. That's the whole point
of IAX2 as opposed to SIP.
OK
And the only IAX2 box made is the Digium one, with it's
Why would someone choose these over other boxes, such as the Sipura 2000 and
3000?
Also, anyone have experience with the TDM400 FXS module in a ground start
configuration?
Digium has said , from two different support folks that they do not and do
work ground start.
If you look at the
