-Original Message-
From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 11:28 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange
Synchronization
On 6/10/05, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Brodbeck
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 4:56 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization
-Original Message-
From: C F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 6/10/05, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I think that has changed to 75gb now (or about to change).
Cheers,
Dean
Really? any links to support that? Since when is Micro$oft so easy on
giving up on licensing fees?
___
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin
Anderson
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 12:53 AM
To: 'George Pajari '; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion '
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization
(b) Anyone
On Friday 10 June 2005 02:15, Dan Levine wrote:
I would be willing to Pay $500 for a good Asterisk / Exchange
Integration
What do you consider good Asterisk and Exchange integration? More than a
handful of words, please.
-A.
___
Asterisk-Users
I would like to support these plans for exchange/outlook integration with at
least $250 as well.
Please have a closer look at http://www.click-and-call.com/ .
Mediastreams has developed their product e-phone, which we could test a
couple of months ago. Their Outlook Integration is really great:
-
Good things are happening.
Another aside from having done this before:
If configuration requires the user to do anything or the user
to load a piece of software it won't work.
Everything must be configured from an admin consol or it won't
work. You will go crazy trying to keep
))) Please see comments inline.
From my perspective, not sure I would want Exchange (Which
is difficult enough to manage) to be cluttered up with
potentially large voicemail files,
That's a concern, especially since bugs in current Asterisk versions
require
you to use uncompressed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's a concern, especially since bugs in current Asterisk versions
require
you to use uncompressed WAV files to get acceptable volume levels.
However,
this *is* a common configuration for other products.
: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange
Synchronization
Sensitivity: Private
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's a concern, especially since bugs in current Asterisk versions
require
you to use uncompressed WAV files to get acceptable
We have a customer considering migrating from a large Nortel PBX with a
third-party voicemail system to Asterisk but one of the features they
really like is the automatic synchronization of voicemail between
Exchange and their voicemail system -- delete a message from the
voicemail system and
-Original Message-
From: George Pajari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization
{clip}
(a) Has anyone cracked this nut
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
George Pajari
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:19 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization
We have
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization
We have a customer considering migrating from a large Nortel PBX with a
third-party voicemail system to Asterisk but one of the features they
really like is the automatic synchronization
Race,
Good stuff.
Thanks.
Here is a nutty
idea: do you thinka slightly insane individual couldcreate something
whereby Asterisk talked to an IMAP4 client which then logged-in to Exchange,
inserted a message with a unique ID#, which it would keep track of, so when the
user deleted the VM
On 6/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Race,
Good stuff. Thanks.
Here is a nutty idea: do you think a slightly insane individual could create
something whereby Asterisk talked to an IMAP4 client which then logged-in to
Exchange, inserted a message with a unique
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 3:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization
(a) Has anyone cracked this nut (or started on it)?
Been there, done that.
No, really. I was the architect
I'm not a programmer - but it sounds to me like you are all making it to
hard by transfer the voice files around etc. unless you really have to
have the messages stored in the mail server for some reason.
here is what I would picture
a outlook plugin that creates the illusion of several
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim
Litwiller
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:16 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange
Synchronization
I'm
(b) Anyone interested if we post a bounty?
Post it and I'll see what can be done. I've been thinking about this and a
watcher on the Exchange server, as Race suggests, is probably the way to go.
As to deleting the voicemail, probably scp or something like that would work
fine. I have good
Kris Boutilier wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim
Litwiller
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:16 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange
Synchronization
|Discussion
|Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voicemail and MS Exchange Synchronization
|Importance: Low
|
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim
| Litwiller
| Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:16 PM
| To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
If I could summarize where we are for a second, please, thanks, and
direct this conversation over to the wiki (ie: see URL below).
It is agreed upon that IMAP is the most universal way to go for maximum
interoperability.
Using a new agreed upon email header, like:
23 matches
Mail list logo
