21 aug 2008 kl. 16.47 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yesterday I blogged a post about some ideas that I think will help
Asterisk appliances further penetrate SMB/SOHO sites in ways that are
not presently being addressed.
I would prefer if you mailed the content too. After all
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Johansson Olle E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just some friendly advice if you really want a discussion. Of course,
I clicked, read and commented ;-)
If this is a way we can get you to say something, Olle, I'm for it! :)
This said, I think Michael was trying to
On 22 Aug 2008, at 14:55, randulo wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Johansson Olle E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just some friendly advice if you really want a discussion. Of course,
I clicked, read and commented ;-)
If this is a way we can get you to say something, Olle, I'm for it!
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Tim Panton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I often read this list offline (during my commute) and articles which
reference a web page without at least summarizing the content
are frustrating :-)
Not to argue, but to add that for what you describe I use Google
Reader.
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:23:09 +0200, Johansson Olle E wrote:
21 aug 2008 kl. 16.47 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yesterday I blogged a post about some ideas that I think will help
Asterisk appliances further penetrate SMB/SOHO sites in ways that are
not presently being addressed.
Yesterday I blogged a post about some ideas that I think will help
Asterisk appliances further penetrate SMB/SOHO sites in ways that are
not presently being addressed.
http://blog.mgraves.org/2008/08/20/a-suggestion-to-asterisk-appliance-developers/
Michael Graves
mgraves at mstvp.com
o(713)
Please google VoIP2.0 apps... this is old old news... even Cisco has
marketed this going back to 2001.
-E
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now:
I Googled as you suggest and nothing even vaugely related is returned.
In fact, VOIP 2.0 as a term doesn't seem to relate.
What I'm suggesting is that smaller PBX systems should embrace a larger
role in the end users operation.
I don't see CCM is small companies or home offices. This is all
