Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-30 Thread Mark Michelson
Matt Florell wrote: Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox. I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list more consistently? I see a few releases on the announce list, but

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-30 Thread Noah Miller
The policy that we have been following is that only final releases will be announced to the asterisk-announce list. Betas and release candidates are not. The rationale is that asterisk-announce is supposed to be a low-volume list and that most subscribers to it would not appreciate all the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-30 Thread Jonn Taylor
Noah Miller wrote: The policy that we have been following is that only final releases will be announced to the asterisk-announce list. Betas and release candidates are not. The rationale is that asterisk-announce is supposed to be a low-volume list and that most subscribers to it would not

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-30 Thread Matt Florell
On 1/30/09, Mark Michelson mmichel...@digium.com wrote: Matt Florell wrote: Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox. I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-29 Thread Remco Barendse
1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pickup with *8 the extension just got dead audio and the next

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-29 Thread Thomas Stein
On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote: 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was trying to pickup the phone by doing a group pickup

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-29 Thread Remco Barendse
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Thomas Stein wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote: 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well. Incoming calls stopped working. Whenever an extension was trying

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-29 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 29 January 2009 13:50:19 Remco Barendse wrote: On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Thomas Stein wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 09:23:41 Remco Barendse wrote: 1.4.23.1 doesn't seem to work for me. I did an in-place upgrade of Asterisk 1.4.21 and upgraded to the latest zaptel as well.

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-29 Thread Matt Florell
For a while we were seeing RC(release cantidates) release announcements and I can see that there were RC release for this 1.4.23 release. Any reason they aren't being publicized, or am I just looking in the wrong place? We always do compatibility testing before putting a new release in production

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-29 Thread Matt Florell
Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox. I wonder if these could also be posted on the asterisk-announce list more consistently? I see a few releases on the announce list, but last 1.4 one was December

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-29 Thread David Backeberg
Has anybody ever asked Digium to provide something like the kernel.org RSS feed? My impression was this was created because kernel.org was tired of how many people built cron-ified wget scripts against kernel.org | diff against last get | sendmail you get the idea Perhaps downloads.digium.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-29 Thread Philipp Kempgen
David Backeberg schrieb: Has anybody ever asked Digium to provide something like the kernel.org RSS feed? My impression was this was created because kernel.org was tired of how many people built cron-ified wget scripts against kernel.org | diff against last get | sendmail you get the

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5 released

2009-01-23 Thread Asterisk Development Team
The Asterisk.org development team has announced the release of Asterisk 1.2.31.1, 1.4.22.2, 1.4.23.1, and 1.6.0.5. These releases are available for immediate download from http://downloads.digium.com/. This update for Asterisk includes a security fix for chan_iax2. Please see the associated