2014-04-04 21:35, Kevin Larsen skrev:
> From: Johan Wilfer
> Sounds very good. Do you have this experience with WMware in particular
> or with virtualization in general?
We run our Asterisk 11 instance in VMWare as well. They share the
hardware with multiple other boxes. We do give Asterisk
> From: Johan Wilfer
> Sounds very good. Do you have this experience with WMware in particular
> or with virtualization in general?
We run our Asterisk 11 instance in VMWare as well. They share the hardware
with multiple other boxes. We do give Asterisk priority over most other
virtual machine
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote:
> I have found Asterisk using only SIP is very responsive on virtual
> machines. We have used VMs for call center applications and for complex IVR
> solutions without problems. Obviously there is overhead running a VM so you
> can never ex
2014-04-04 19:30, Carlos Chavez skrev:
I have found Asterisk using only SIP is very responsive on virtual
machines. We have used VMs for call center applications and for complex
IVR solutions without problems. Obviously there is overhead running a
VM so you can never expect a VM to perform
2014-04-04 19:30, Carlos Chavez skrev:
I have found Asterisk using only SIP is very responsive on virtual
machines. We have used VMs for call center applications and for complex
IVR solutions without problems. Obviously there is overhead running a
VM so you can never expect a VM to perform
I have found Asterisk using only SIP is very responsive on virtual
machines. We have used VMs for call center applications and for complex
IVR solutions without problems. Obviously there is overhead running a
VM so you can never expect a VM to perform as well as bare metal.
Running a sin
Hi!
Anyone that have tried using Asterisk 11 with SIP + Confbridge as a
VMware virtual machine? Any issues to be aware of?
Of course the hardware node needs to to be powerful enough - but say you
have just one virtual machine on the node - will the performance be
drastically less than runnin
