Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA with heartbeat and systemd

[Olivier]

2015-10-19 22:05 GMT+02:00 Telium Technical Support :

> If you’re still in the planning stage, there’s a lot more to think about.
> Your Asterisk failure detection will be very simplistic (is the process
> dead).  Synchronization of data – without risking synchronization of
> corrupt data to a peer.  Prevent a deteriorating/failing peer corruption
> from corrupted the other peer (i.e. now shared resources).  Awareness of
> upstream (e.g.: route/network) failures making the peer unavailable – and
> how to detect that.  Etc. etc.
>
>
>
> Here’s a good checklist of things to consider in your design:
> http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+High+Availability+Design
>

Yes I read this document and found it very informative.

I don't think I'll be able to detect Asterisk failures automatically so
basically I'll rely on a manual processes to either move from one server to
the other or to sync configs (in fact, I'll keep both configs as
independant as possible to avoid one machine's config to corrupt the other).

>
>
> If you are building a small/home office HA then the free version of
> commercial tools may be the way to go.  If have a $0 budget but for a
> larger installation, use the design guide above to help figure out which
> compromises to make.  (Heartbeat / Linux HA is better than nothing).
>
>
>
> -M-
>
> --
> _
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA with heartbeat and systemd

[Olivier]

My machines have both a /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/asterisk file
(from resource-agents package, it seems).
If I'm not mistaken, this file is not run when asterisk is started/stopped
by hb_standby/hb_takeover commands (I added a touch /tmp/foobar line in
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/asterisk to check this).

How does this script compare with rc.debian.asterisk that can be found in
contrib/init.d directory ?
Is this file maintained by Asterisk community and closely following
Asterisk evolution or is it rather independant from Asterisk development
team ?
What would you recommend on this subject ?



2015-10-19 20:11 GMT+02:00 Olivier :

> Hello,
>
> I'm setting up an active-passive Asterisk solution on Debian Jessie
> platforms.
> I'm using heartbeat package.
>
> As I'm not yet familiar with either systemd or heartbeat, I've got a
> couple of questions:
>
> 1. At the moment, I'm using /usr/share/heartbeat/hb_standby or
> /usr/share/heartbeat/hb_takeover scripts to both :
> - allocate "floating" IP addresses to active server
> - start/stop asterisk daemon.
>
> Is this appropriate ? What would you recommand instead ?
>
>
> 2. My /etc/ha.d/haresources file contains:
> machine1 192.168.1.3 asterisk
>
> With this, I can see that asterisk daemon is correctly started and stopped
> when hb_standby/hb_takeover commands are typed but "service
> asterisk,status" is a bit misleading with:
>
> service asterisk status
> ● asterisk.service - LSB: Asterisk PBX
>Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/asterisk)
>Active: active (exited) since lun. 2015-10-19 18:02:58 CEST; 41min ago
>   Process: 19576 ExecStop=/etc/init.d/asterisk stop (code=exited,
> status=0/SUCCESS)
>   Process: 19583 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/asterisk start (code=exited,
> status=0/SUCCESS)
>
> How can I best improve this and configure heartbeat to use "service
> asterisk start/stop" ?
>
> Regards
>
>
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA with heartbeat and systemd

[Telium Technical Support]

If you’re still in the planning stage, there’s a lot more to think about.  Your 
Asterisk failure detection will be very simplistic (is the process dead).  
Synchronization of data – without risking synchronization of corrupt data to a 
peer.  Prevent a deteriorating/failing peer corruption from corrupted the other 
peer (i.e. now shared resources).  Awareness of upstream (e.g.: route/network) 
failures making the peer unavailable – and how to detect that.  Etc. etc.

 

Here’s a good checklist of things to consider in your design:  
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+High+Availability+Design

 

If you are building a small/home office HA then the free version of commercial 
tools may be the way to go.  If have a $0 budget but for a larger installation, 
use the design guide above to help figure out which compromises to make.  
(Heartbeat / Linux HA is better than nothing).

 

-M-

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA with heartbeat and systemd

[Olivier]

Hello,

I'm setting up an active-passive Asterisk solution on Debian Jessie
platforms.
I'm using heartbeat package.

As I'm not yet familiar with either systemd or heartbeat, I've got a couple
of questions:

1. At the moment, I'm using /usr/share/heartbeat/hb_standby or
/usr/share/heartbeat/hb_takeover scripts to both :
- allocate "floating" IP addresses to active server
- start/stop asterisk daemon.

Is this appropriate ? What would you recommand instead ?


2. My /etc/ha.d/haresources file contains:
machine1 192.168.1.3 asterisk

With this, I can see that asterisk daemon is correctly started and stopped
when hb_standby/hb_takeover commands are typed but "service
asterisk,status" is a bit misleading with:

service asterisk status
● asterisk.service - LSB: Asterisk PBX
   Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/asterisk)
   Active: active (exited) since lun. 2015-10-19 18:02:58 CEST; 41min ago
  Process: 19576 ExecStop=/etc/init.d/asterisk stop (code=exited,
status=0/SUCCESS)
  Process: 19583 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/asterisk start (code=exited,
status=0/SUCCESS)

How can I best improve this and configure heartbeat to use "service
asterisk start/stop" ?

Regards
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

[Chris Bagnall]

On 6/6/13 4:53 am, Gopalakrishnan N wrote:

Any other HA applications available or the lsyncd with pacemaker is good?


I generally use Pacemaker with Heartbeat, which seems to work pretty well.

Kind regards,

Chris
--
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

[Gopalakrishnan N]

I was go through'ing the following links for HA,

https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/TOP/Failover+-+Linux - which doesn't
have file syncing.

https://www.johncahill.net/wiki/index.php/2_Node_Active/Passive_cluster -
this one has file syncing with pacemaker

Any other HA applications available or the lsyncd with pacemaker is good?

Regards
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls

[Deka, Rajib IN MAA SL]

Hi Dhaval,

Thanks for your much appreciable reply.
Sorry for late reply as I was out of office.
We considered the situation that pending queue call cannot be retrieved during 
failover, and hence it's ok with us if we loose the calls also.

Regards,
Rajib

Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 14:15:59 +0530
From: DHAVAL INDRODIYA dhaval.it01...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: BANLkTi=ypq1up4ti35-ljzbw9_ju+v9...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hi Rajib,

I think It is not possible with asterisk , as primary server goes down it
will stop asterisk services so once asterisk service down i think all
connected calls to queue will hangup automatically, and you cannot retrive
those calls as they all are disconnected .

I think you need to consider more on load balancing per asterisk server in
that case the problem of Availability is solved to some level, If You using
SIP protocol then you can think of OPENSER and from that you can use
loadbalancer which routed calls in a way an depend on machine strength.

I hope this idea will useful to solve your requirement.

Regards
Dhaval

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Deka, Rajib IN MAA SL 
rajib.d...@siemens.com wrote:

  Hello List,



 We are running two asterisk machines in virtual IP as primary and secondary
 server.

 Initially virtual IP will be active in primary server; during the failure
 of primary secondary will get the virtual IP.



 Is there any way to retrieve pending queue calls from primary to secondary,
 in case primary fails?

 Does asterisk provide any interface to do it or we have to write some
 application on asterisk to do the same.



 Regards,

 Rajib




Important notice: This e-mail and any attachment there to contains corporate 
proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notify us 
immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments from 
your system.
Thank You.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls

[Deka, Rajib IN MAA SL]

Hello List,

We are running two asterisk machines in virtual IP as primary and secondary 
server.
Initially virtual IP will be active in primary server; during the failure of 
primary secondary will get the virtual IP.

Is there any way to retrieve pending queue calls from primary to secondary, in 
case primary fails?
Does asterisk provide any interface to do it or we have to write some 
application on asterisk to do the same.

Regards,
Rajib



Important notice: This e-mail and any attachment there to contains corporate 
proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notify us 
immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments from 
your system.
Thank You.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk HA for queue calls

[DHAVAL INDRODIYA]

Hi Rajib,

I think It is not possible with asterisk , as primary server goes down it
will stop asterisk services so once asterisk service down i think all
connected calls to queue will hangup automatically, and you cannot retrive
those calls as they all are disconnected .

I think you need to consider more on load balancing per asterisk server in
that case the problem of Availability is solved to some level, If You using
SIP protocol then you can think of OPENSER and from that you can use
loadbalancer which routed calls in a way an depend on machine strength.

I hope this idea will useful to solve your requirement.

Regards
Dhaval

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Deka, Rajib IN MAA SL 
rajib.d...@siemens.com wrote:

  Hello List,



 We are running two asterisk machines in virtual IP as primary and secondary
 server.

 Initially virtual IP will be active in primary server; during the failure
 of primary secondary will get the virtual IP.



 Is there any way to retrieve pending queue calls from primary to secondary,
 in case primary fails?

 Does asterisk provide any interface to do it or we have to write some
 application on asterisk to do the same.



 Regards,

 Rajib



 --
 Important notice: This e-mail and any attachment there to contains
 corporate proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake,
 please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its
 attachments from your system.
 Thank You.

 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

[astgroups]

Google for some of the How Tos built around Elastix and Trixbox. Both of these 
are CentOS based as well. 

good luck. 

- Original Message - 
From: James Hankins j...@allpointsmediaworks.com 
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2009 1:58:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform) 

I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on 
Centos. I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this 
some of which are packages that seem quite dated from an update 
perspective (Ultra Monkey links I've seen haven't been updated in a 
while). What is the current best practice on this for this platform? 
My first foray into any of the Linux HA setups but not afraid of the 
command line. 

Jim 



___ 
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- 

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona 
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net 

asterisk-users mailing list 
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

[Danny Nicholas]

Checkout nerdvittles.com.  They have good stuff when they are up.

 

  _  

From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
astgro...@comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:49 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3
Platform)

 

Google for some of the How Tos built around Elastix and Trixbox. Both of
these are CentOS based as well.

good luck.

- Original Message -
From: James Hankins j...@allpointsmediaworks.com
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2009 1:58:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on  
Centos.  I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this  
some of which are packages that seem quite dated from an update  
perspective (Ultra Monkey links I've seen haven't been updated in a  
while).  What is the current best practice on this for this platform?   
My first foray into any of the Linux HA setups but not afraid of the  
command line.

Jim



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

[James Hankins]

I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on  
Centos.  I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this  
some of which are packages that seem quite dated from an update  
perspective (Ultra Monkey links I've seen haven't been updated in a  
while).  What is the current best practice on this for this platform?   
My first foray into any of the Linux HA setups but not afraid of the  
command line.

Jim



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

[Jonathan Thurman]

I have been working on a HA procedure for Asterisk on CentOS 5.3, but
haven't had time to publish it.  It is a little complex, but here are
the components used:

- CentOS 5.3
- Asterisk 1.6 (version doesn't matter)
- MySQL
- Cluster services
- GFS2
- DRBD

A basic run-down is:

* Two servers configured with DRBD in Master-Master mode.  All data is
replicated between the two so in case of a failure there should be
very limited data loss (voicemail) if any at all.

* MySQL and Asterisk run on the same node.  If you have an external
MySQL server / don't use MySQL, then this is not an issue.  The MySQL
data directory is also mounted on a GFS2/DRBD partition.  The most
important thing here is to use INNODB, NOT MYISAM!  MyISAM doesn't
take kindly fail-over...

* Using Cluster services enables you to create GFS2 file systems (on
top of DRBD) so that both nodes can see the data at the same time.
This is important to reduce the time required for fail-over.  Cluster
services also handles starting/stopping the services, and migrating
the Virtual IP address between nodes.

* DHCP (if needed) runs on both nodes, as DHCP has native support for
fail-over configuration.

It's pretty easy to get installed and running.  I also create RPMS for
Asterisk, so that the version on each service is the exact same.  I
can upgrade one node, use the cluster manager to fail-over to the
other node (during a maintenance window of course!).

The biggest issue now is that the CentOS Repo is somewhat broken for
Cluster... but there is a work around on the bug tracker for CentOS.
Hopefully that will be resolved soon.

Let me know off list if you need any help!

-Jonathan



On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:58 AM, James Hankins
j...@allpointsmediaworks.com wrote:
 I'm looking into doing an HA setup for a Asterisk 1.4 install on
 Centos.  I've seen a number of different pointers to packages for this
 some of which are packages that seem quite dated from an update
 perspective (Ultra Monkey links I've seen haven't been updated in a
 while).  What is the current best practice on this for this platform?
 My first foray into any of the Linux HA setups but not afraid of the
 command line.

 Jim



 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

[Fred Posner]

 * Two servers configured with DRBD in Master-Master mode.  All data is
 replicated between the two so in case of a failure there should be
 very limited data loss (voicemail) if any at all.

If you put the asterisk spool, lib, and config files on the DRBD then
you shouldn't lose voicemail or any configuration.

Fred Posner

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA Current Thoughts (Centos 5.3 Platform)

[Jonathan Thurman]

On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Fred Posner f...@teamforrest.com wrote:
 * Two servers configured with DRBD in Master-Master mode.  All data is
 replicated between the two so in case of a failure there should be
 very limited data loss (voicemail) if any at all.

 If you put the asterisk spool, lib, and config files on the DRBD then
 you shouldn't lose voicemail or any configuration.

If someone is in the middle of recording a message, and the server
fails, you will probably lose that message.  That's all I was getting
at.

-Jonathan

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

[Diego Quintana Cruz]

2007/1/11, Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Ciao,

Enrico Pasqualotto wrote:
 Is better ultramonkey, dundi or SER proxy in front of * server?

You can also consider Hartbeat + rsync, or simply pfsync + rsync ;)


The problem with Asterisk HA, is mainly the lost of calls when
failover occurs. This is because all traffic pass through Asterisk
always. In order to solve this, you could use SER + Asterisk +
OpenSER. That way, you'll only lose calls that are going outside your
network, but calls inside will remain.

--
Diego Quintana a.k.a. RouterMaN
Ingeniería de las Telecomunicaciones
PUCP
Linux Registered User #382615 - http://counter.li.org/
SIP # 1-747-633-6676 Ext. 1011
FWD # 764839 Ext. 1011
http://routerman.blogsome.com
http://planeta.debianperu.org
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

[Ale]

Ciao,

Enrico Pasqualotto wrote:

Is better ultramonkey, dundi or SER proxy in front of * server?


You can also consider Hartbeat + rsync, or simply pfsync + rsync ;)


Thanks  Enrico


Ciao Ciao ,
Ale
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Asterisk HA

[Enrico Pasqualotto]

Hi all, I have to make for a client an asterisk system for process up to 
250 calls between conference and normal call.
At disposition I have 4 xserver 346 with dual xeon 3.0Ghz and the client 
require a failover system.

Anyone have experience for this type of solution?
Is better ultramonkey, dundi or SER proxy in front of * server?

Thanks  Enrico

P.S. Now during all this year I have to work with this type of solution, 
 why not make a fork of this ml  for example 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], for write some docs too.

--
Pasqualotto 'Pasqu' Enrico
enrico AT pasqualotto DOT org
web: http://www.pasqualotto.org
skype: epasqualotto
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users