On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Waynewa...@planetwayne.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quickie to say that this has been solved now - real simple -
downloaded '*current*' rather than the versions from the home page of
Astrisk.org. (didn't realise there was a 'current' version tbh.
Anyways - I
Huh?
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/asterisk-1.6.0-current.tar.gz
is not the same as
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/asterisk-1.6.0.10.tar.gz?
Their sha1 files are identical.
sean
I believe he means that:
Hi all,
Just a quickie to say that this has been solved now - real simple -
downloaded '*current*' rather than the versions from the home page of
Astrisk.org. (didn't realise there was a 'current' version tbh.
Anyways - I don't get Asterisk seg faulting now when hammering the
speaker button on
On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote:
And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny.
Opinion time for me as well:
Dont. without bugreports chan_skinny will never be on par with chan_sip.
I know there are some segfaults with it here and there, but it's being
worked on.
--
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.infowrote:
On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote:
And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny.
Opinion time for me as well:
Dont. without bugreports chan_skinny will never be on par with chan_sip.
I know
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Steve Totaro
stot...@asteriskhelpdesk.comwrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.infowrote:
On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote:
And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny.
Opinion time for me as well:
On 08:58, Sat 11 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Steve Totaro
stot...@asteriskhelpdesk.comwrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michiel van Baak
mich...@vanbaak.infowrote:
On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote:
And convert those phones to
On 08:53, Sat 11 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Michiel van Baak mich...@vanbaak.infowrote:
On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote:
And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny.
Opinion time for me as well:
Dont. without bugreports
Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 19:07, Fri 10 Jul 09, Steve Totaro wrote:
And convert those phones to SIP, forget chan_skinny.
Opinion time for me as well:
Dont. without bugreports chan_skinny will never be on par with chan_sip.
I know there are some segfaults with it here
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Wayne wa...@planetwayne.com wrote:
Thanks for all for the feedback with this - I'd like to help where I can -
I'm building another 1.6 system for the office to try out the exchange tie
in so if the general consensus is SIP is ok - then that's good for me too
Sorry to bump my own message - but had a mail server problem so don't
know if I missed any replys :(
Ta
Wayne.
Wayne wrote:
Hi all,
I've just built a new installation of CentOS release 5.3 (Final) and
have installed both
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Steve Totaro
stot...@totarotechnologies.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Wayne wa...@planetwayne.com wrote:
Sorry to bump my own message - but had a mail server problem so don't
know if I missed any replys :(
Ta
Wayne.
Wayne wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Wayne wa...@planetwayne.com wrote:
Sorry to bump my own message - but had a mail server problem so don't
know if I missed any replys :(
Ta
Wayne.
Wayne wrote:
Hi all,
I've just built a new installation of CentOS release 5.3 (Final) and
have installed
Steve Totaro wrote:
If you are set on beta then read no further then the next line.
File a bug report with a core dump.
OK opinion time.
Your server is more than adequate.
For my tastes, you are beyond bleeding edge on the Asterisk front.
Simply my opinion but
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Wayne wa...@planetwayne.com wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
If you are set on beta then read no further then the next line.
File a bug report with a core dump.
OK opinion time.
Your server is more than adequate.
For my tastes,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Wayne wa...@planetwayne.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the pointers. I must admit - I was leaning towards 1.6 as
this apparently has support for SIP over TCP (?). My end goal with this
was to try and get Asterisk talking to Exchange 2007 servers unified
Hi all,
I've just built a new installation of CentOS release 5.3 (Final) and
have installed both
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/releases/asterisk-1.6.1.1.tar.gzAsterisk
1.6.1.1 and subsequently Asterisk 1.6.0.10 (thinking that I was maybe
trying to be too cutting edge)
17 matches
Mail list logo
