Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
Check out this https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17270 > From: tilgh...@meg.abyt.es > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:23:28 -0500 > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue > > On Friday 25 March 2011 16:23:27 satish

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
um.com > Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:23:28 -0500 > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue > > On Friday 25 March 2011 16:23:27 satish patel wrote: > > I just start "Pri set debug on span 1" and its showing D-channel is > > down > > How d

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Friday 25 March 2011 16:23:27 satish patel wrote: > I just start "Pri set debug on span 1" and its showing D-channel is > down How do you have the underlying T1 signalling set up in /etc/dahdi/system.conf (on both ends)? -- Tilghman -- ___

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
ding SABME From: satish...@hotmail.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 21:13:34 + Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue sometime i am getting following error also. what is this means? [Mar 25 17:11:52] WARNING[5961]: sig_pri.c:985 pri_fin

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
21:04:45 + Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue Only Difference is one side card is ECHO Cancellation supported and other is non-ECHO cancellation. Is there any issue ? @Asterisk1 Sangoma A102 (non-ECHW) @Asterisk2 Sangoma A102D (ECHW) -Satish From

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
:41:09 + Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue Okay! i have changed context at master side ; Span 1: WPT1/0 "wanpipe1 card 0" (MASTER) switchtype = national ; commonly referred to as NI2 context = from-internal group = 1,24 echocancel = yes signalling

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
..@meg.abyt.es > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:35:21 -0500 > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue > > On Friday 25 March 2011 14:40:40 satish patel wrote: > > Following is my scenario to connect back to back PRI of two

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
TE_CLOCK= NORMAL TE_REF_CLOCK= 0 From: satish...@hotmail.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:25:31 + Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue Thanks Doug, I tried that also but result is same. > Date: Fri, 25

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Friday 25 March 2011 14:40:40 satish patel wrote: > Following is my scenario to connect back to back PRI of two asterisk > server. PRI cards are Sangoma A102D > > [Asterisk1][PRI]-Cross Cable-[Asterisk2] > > Asterisk1 > > ; Span 1 (MASTER) > switchtype = national ; commonl

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
Thanks Doug, I tried that also but result is same. > Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:11:49 -0400 > From: supp...@drdos.info > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue > > satish patel wrote: > > group = 0,24

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
011 16:04:12 -0400 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue Did you check so see if the pri is up? Also, make sure wanpipe & dahdi is setup correctly. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of satish pa

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Friday 25 March 2011 15:11:49 Doug Lytle wrote: > satish patel wrote: > > group = 0,24 > > Granted, I'm still running 1.4.x, but I don't believe the above is > valid. > > My guess is it should be: > > group = 0 No, that's valid. You can have any of groups 0-63 set on a single group of chann

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread Doug Lytle
satish patel wrote: group = 0,24 Granted, I'm still running 1.4.x, but I don't believe the above is valid. My guess is it should be: group = 0 Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety

Re: [asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread William Stillwell
risk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue Following is my scenario to connect back to back PRI of two asterisk server. PRI cards are Sangoma A102D [Asterisk1][PRI]-Cross Cable-[Asterisk2] Asterisk1 ; Span 1 (MASTER) switchtype = national ; commonly referred to as

[asterisk-users] Back-to-back asterisk PRI issue

2011-03-25 Thread satish patel
Following is my scenario to connect back to back PRI of two asterisk server. PRI cards are Sangoma A102D [Asterisk1][PRI]-Cross Cable-[Asterisk2] Asterisk1 ; Span 1 (MASTER) switchtype = national ; commonly referred to as NI2 context = from-pstn group = 0,24 echocancel =