Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2011-01-01 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
state of the >> ${DIALSTATUS} to CANCEL and if nothing changes it that would stand, but >> I may be missing the point on this can anyone else speak to it? >> >> Bryant >> >> ------------ >> *From*: "Vardan Harutyunyan" >> *Sent*: Thursday, December 23

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-24 Thread BryantZ
t would make sense to set the inital state of the >>>> ${DIALSTATUS} to CANCEL and if nothing changes it that would stand, but >>>> I may be missing the point on this can anyone else speak to it? >>>> >>>> Bryant >>>> >>>

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-24 Thread Vardan Harutyunyan
an Harutyunyan" *Sent*: Thursday, December 23, 2010 2:11 AM *To*: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL I have make test in AEL. context fu { _000./userN => { Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:3...@prov); Noop(${DIALSTATUS}); }; h => { Noop(${DIALSTATUS}

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-24 Thread Jim Dickenson
t;>> SIP/userN-b6317738 >>> == Spawn extension (fu, 00018185402020, 2) exited non-zero on >>> 'SIP/user3-b6317738' >>> -- Executing [...@fu:1] NoOp("SIP/userN-b6317738", "CANCEL") in new stack >>> >>> I think, I am right >>> >>> -- >>> Vardan Har

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-24 Thread BryantZ
the >> ${DIALSTATUS} to CANCEL and if nothing changes it that would stand, but >> I may be missing the point on this can anyone else speak to it? >> >> Bryant >> >> ---------------- >> *From*: "Vardan Harutyunyan" >> *Sent*: Thursday, December 23, 2010 2:

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-24 Thread Vardan Harutyunyan
yone else speak to it? Bryant *From*: "Vardan Harutyunyan" *Sent*: Thursday, December 23, 2010 2:11 AM *To*: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL I have make test in AEL. context f

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-23 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
one else speak to it? Bryant From: "Vardan Harutyunyan" Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 2:11 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL I have make test in AEL. context fu { _000./userN => {

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-23 Thread Michael
Thanks Vardan, You're right. Running the script under h extension gets me the results I'm looking for. On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Vardan Harutyunyan wrote: > Try to use h extension > > -- > Vardan Harutyunyan, > Senior System Administrator > > Enterprise Incubator Foundation > 123 Hovsep E

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-22 Thread Vardan Harutyunyan
; *Sent*: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 10:39 AM *To*: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com *Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL Try to use h extension -- Vardan Harutyunyan, Senior System Administrator Enterprise Incubator Foundation 123 Hovsep Emin Street, Yerevan 0051, Republic of Armenia

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-22 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
The Dial Status is not set when accessing it from the h extension. Bryant From: "Vardan Harutyunyan" Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 10:39 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL Tr

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-22 Thread Vardan Harutyunyan
Try to use h extension -- Vardan Harutyunyan, Senior System Administrator Enterprise Incubator Foundation 123 Hovsep Emin Street, Yerevan 0051, Republic of Armenia Tel: + 374 10 219735 Fax: + 374 10 219777 E-mail: i...@eif.am www.eif-it.com Michael wrote: Hi Nikhil, Both debug and verbose are

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-22 Thread Bryant Zimmerman
g as well. Bryant From: "Michael" Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 9:42 AM To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL Hi Nikhil, Both debug and verbose are set t

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-22 Thread Michael
Hi Nikhil, Both debug and verbose are set to 20. That's all I got, but as you can see, for the other types of reasons, the DIALSTATUS got a value (and we see the events). I'm pretty sure it's a bug. Michael On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Nikhil wrote: > Hi >Enable debug level to more tha

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-21 Thread Nikhil
Hi Enable debug level to more than 1 ,you may get something. Thanks Nikhil On 12/22/2010 11:26 AM, Michael wrote: Spawn extension (incoming-private, , 3) exited non-zero on 'SIP/Proxy-0031' -- _ -- Bandwidth a

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-21 Thread Michael
Anyone?? Thanks. On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM, VoIP Question wrote: > Hello, > > We have a strange situation (asterisk 1.6.2.14), where we get a result for > DIALSTATUS for BUSY and No-ANSWER, but nothing for CANCEL. > > This is the (relevant) test dialplan: > ---

[asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-20 Thread VoIP Question
Hello, We have a strange situation (asterisk 1.6.2.14), where we get a result for DIALSTATUS for BUSY and No-ANSWER, but nothing for CANCEL. This is the (relevant) test dialplan: [incoming-private] exten => _X., n, Dial(SIP/1001,30) exten => _X., n, NoOp(${DIALSTA