Hi Eric;
I decreased the gain (although I was need to increase
it) and the problem somehow resolved partially (much
more better), but now I have a problem in the voice
volume, it is weak. If I increased the volume, then
the duplicatin in the DTMF for the first entered digit
(specifically) will
Actually, relaxDTMF helped me.
I realized I was putting it in the wrong location in the zapata.conf
to get it to apply to my channels.
'zap show channel #' will tell if you if RelaxDTMF is enabled on a channel.
-- James
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:55 AM, bilal ghayyad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
zap show channel 3 is giving me that I am using
relaxdtmf (actually I placed the relaxdtmf before the
assiging for the channel - 3).
I increased the volume rxgain and txgain and now the
voice is hearable good, but still the detection for
the dtmf has duplication.
But, if I let the voice message
Hi,
I have a Digium TE410p T1 card and I've noticed that under asterisk
1.4.17/18 I have problems detecting DTMF in IVRs. I think I've
narrowed the problem down to some sort of interference between the
greeting that is playing and the DTMF tones. DTMF detection seems to
work very reliably when I
I seem to be having similar problems at one of my branch offices. See
my message on Intermittent DTMF issues for some of the standard
replies. Have you tried the RelaxDTMF tag in zapata.conf? I don't
think Gain calibration applies to T1 cards or I would recommend that as
well.
Thanks,
Hi James;
Before putting my comments, first of all I would like
to ask u something that might also help: how can u use
the Read() or the WaitExten() instead of the
Background?
From the other side:
I got one email from eric asked me to Lower the rxgain
and txgain on your Zap channels. But
Hi everyone.
I've tried RelaxDTMF and it didn't seem to help.
I can't use Read() or WaitExten() instead of background.
What I was doing was running a test using the following dialplan:
[custom-testdtmf2]
exten = s,1,Answer
exten = s,n,AGI(festival-script.pl|Enter test digits. Then press pound.)
Another note, after looking at the source code, it seems as though
WaitExten() and Read() use ast_waitfordigit() where Background uses
ast_waitstream().
Apparently these 2 functions must behave differently.
-- James
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:45 AM, James Lamanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
