Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-16 Thread JR Richardson
>> Cyprus VoIP wrote: >> >>> This is the reINVITE SDP received from the SIP Proxy: >>> --- >>> Content-Type: application/sdp >>> Content-Length: 353 >>> >>> v=0 >>> o=root 30427 30428 IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx >>> s=session >>> c=IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx >>> t=0 0 >>> m=image 17548 udptl t38 >>> a

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-16 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Cyprus VoIP wrote: > Yes. I saw the message and the required addition in the sip.conf. The > problem is that if I set it to 72, other terminating gateways that > support 400 or more would also be limited to 72. This is incorrect. First, you would not set it to 72, since the endpoint is already

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-15 Thread Cyprus VoIP
> Cyprus VoIP wrote: > >> This is the reINVITE SDP received from the SIP Proxy: >> --- >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Length: 353 >> >> v=0 >> o=root 30427 30428 IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx >> s=session >> c=IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx >> t=0 0 >> m=image 17548 udptl t38 >> a=T38FaxVersio

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-15 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Cyprus VoIP wrote: > This is the reINVITE SDP received from the SIP Proxy: > --- > Content-Type: application/sdp > Content-Length: 353 > > v=0 > o=root 30427 30428 IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx > s=session > c=IN IP4 194.98.xxx.xxx > t=0 0 > m=image 17548 udptl t38 > a=T38FaxVersion:0 > a=T38MaxB

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-15 Thread Cyprus VoIP
al Message ---- Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9 From: Cyprus VoIP To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Date: Friday, 04 December, 2009 18:21:59 >> It's probably because you are using 1.6.1.9; that release (and older) >> had a &

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-04 Thread Cyprus VoIP
> It's probably because you are using 1.6.1.9; that release (and older) > had a 'feature' that allowed automatic switching back to audio from T.38 > if one of the endpoints sent an audio packet. It turns out that wasn't a > good idea, and it's been removed... but in later versions. You'll have > to

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-04 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Cyprus VoIP wrote: > If it's not related, why does Asterisk send again INVITE messages to > both parties? How can this be prevented? I don't see more debug data > prior to the new INVITE. It's probably because you are using 1.6.1.9; that release (and older) had a 'feature' that allowed automati

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-04 Thread Cyprus VoIP
> Cyprus VoIP wrote: > >> So, I enabled the full logger, and the strange thing I see is this message: >> "Got T.38 Re-invite without audio. Keeping RTP active during T.38 session" >> >> It seems that this might be the reason Asterisk initiates a reINVITE >> with voice codecs, after connecting the

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-04 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Cyprus VoIP wrote: > So, I enabled the full logger, and the strange thing I see is this message: > "Got T.38 Re-invite without audio. Keeping RTP active during T.38 session" > > It seems that this might be the reason Asterisk initiates a reINVITE > with voice codecs, after connecting the 2 parti

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-04 Thread Cyprus VoIP
> Set 'canreinvite=no' on all applicable peers? > I tried with yes and no. No difference. I'm almost certain it's related to the "Keeping RTP active during T.38 session" issue. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-04 Thread Cyprus VoIP
> Cyprus VoIP wrote: > >> Thank you for your answer. The 'internal extension' is indeed a T.38 >> capable device that works perfectly when connected directly to the >> Proxy/ITSP. >> >> As you said, the key to debugging/resolving this issue is the logger. I >> wasn't aware of this file. this is

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-03 Thread Alex Balashov
Set 'canreinvite=no' on all applicable peers? Cyprus VoIP wrote: > Hello, > > We are trying to send faxes by T.38 protocol to a remote SIP proxy from > a local extension. The local extension sends the INVITE, Asterisk sends > the call to the Proxy the call is connected with a regular audio cod

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-03 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Cyprus VoIP wrote: > Thank you for your answer. The 'internal extension' is indeed a T.38 > capable device that works perfectly when connected directly to the > Proxy/ITSP. > > As you said, the key to debugging/resolving this issue is the logger. I > wasn't aware of this file. this is what I h

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-03 Thread Cyprus VoIP
>> We set "t38pt_udptl=yes" in sip.conf and allowed all the codecs to the >> local extension and remote Proxy, but it still forces the call to go >> back to a voice call. > > Define 'internal extension'. Is this a T.38-capable device? If not, > Asterisk doesn't support TDM-to-T.38 FAX relay (yet

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-03 Thread David Backeberg
Cyprus VoIP wrote: > We set "t38pt_udptl=yes" in sip.conf and allowed all the codecs to the > local extension and remote Proxy, but it still forces the call to go > back to a voice call. That's correct behavior if T.38 cannot autonegotiate. What happens in the reverse direction, trying to send fa

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-03 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Cyprus VoIP wrote: > We set "t38pt_udptl=yes" in sip.conf and allowed all the codecs to the > local extension and remote Proxy, but it still forces the call to go > back to a voice call. Define 'internal extension'. Is this a T.38-capable device? If not, Asterisk doesn't support TDM-to-T.38 FAX

[asterisk-users] Fax throughput - Asterisk 1.6.1.9

2009-12-03 Thread Cyprus VoIP
Hello, We are trying to send faxes by T.38 protocol to a remote SIP proxy from a local extension. The local extension sends the INVITE, Asterisk sends the call to the Proxy the call is connected with a regular audio codec. After a few seconds the remote proxy sends an INVITE with UDPTL and the