This may be of interest -- as a tool we can use to test our systems and as
a weapon that may be used against us :)
http://warvox.org/
A brief read-over looks like it uses iaxclient and ruby to war dial a
range of numbers and record audio samples to be analyzed to identify if
the call
Last thing we need is more war.
--
Sent from mobile device
On Mar 6, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com
wrote:
This may be of interest -- as a tool we can use to test our systems
and as
a weapon that may be used against us :)
http://warvox.org/
A brief
It utilizes the iaxclient for piping the raw audio to a flat file where it's
then analyzed.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Alex Balashov abalas...@evaristesys.comwrote:
Last thing we need is more war.
--
Sent from mobile device
On Mar 6, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Steve Edwards
Another war dialer with IAX capabilities:
http://www.softwink.com/iwar/
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com wrote:
This may be of interest -- as a tool we can use to test our systems
and as
a weapon that may be
Tim Nelson wrote:
The fact that this would be even being discussed on this list is an
embarrassment to the asterisk community.
I am constantly being pestered by cold callers with fake caller ids,
probe calls such as this, etc. I think for once CRTC/FCC need to step up
to the plate and take
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 04:24:42PM -0500, Jon Pounder wrote:
Tim Nelson wrote:
The fact that this would be even being discussed on this list is an
embarrassment to the asterisk community.
Why? I didn't know about those dialers before.
This type of software is something that someone will
Not to burst your bubble, Jon, as I agree with a majority of what you
said... but using an argument about the evolution of email to support an
argument about how telcos should have better tracking and accountability
is somewhat weird.
We get 3 million email messages a day through our servers.
SIP wrote:
Not to burst your bubble, Jon, as I agree with a majority of what you
said... but using an argument about the evolution of email to support an
argument about how telcos should have better tracking and accountability
is somewhat weird.
We get 3 million email messages a day
Umm... Caller ID spoofing and DSP audio processing of called numbers are two
entirely different subjects.
And as far as creating more laws:
I say fix the damn technology first (Caller ID) before wasting tax payers
money on more laws on the books that will be obsolete in a few years time.
While
In Canada the do not call registry is useless since calls do not
originate in Canada nor do the violators care if they are doing
something illegal, Telcos could take this further and if a number of
complaints are received about a call source, offer an opt-in blocking
plan to throw those calls
- Jon Pounder j...@inline.net wrote:
Tim Nelson wrote:
Now you're making others think I wrote this tirade of crap.
The fact that this would be even being discussed on this list is an
embarrassment to the asterisk community.
Isn't this the *perfect* place to be discussing this type
11 matches
Mail list logo
