Hello James, thank you so much for your response!
On 6/14/13, James Cloos wrote:
> If they will do atm over oc-n, perhaps that would work better.
Yes they will do atm over oc-n only not sure if they will ring or spur it...
> Ie, a perm virt circ for SS7 and as-needed vc's for ulaw.
I know you'
If they will do atm over oc-n, perhaps that would work better.
Ie, a perm virt circ for SS7 and as-needed vc's for ulaw.
Atm oc-n cards with linux sw support are widely available, according to goog.
libss7 and and ast *might* need a bit of patching to work with it, but it
shoudn't take too much.
Hello Eric,
Thank your for your reponse. We are discussing interconnects at a
different level. We are more interested in SS7 or ISUP-IP SS7IP type
interconnects. There are many people that offer DIDs channels etc.
over the internet. Including us.
N.
--
___
rsday, June 13, 2013 10:29 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5
vs DS3
On 6/13/13, Eric Wieling wrote:
> Verizon (NE ILEC) has SIP handoff.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: as
sk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS:
> VT1.5 vs DS3
>
Hello Eric,
Thank you so much for your response. Is this an ISUP-IP interconnect
(i.e., SS7IP), or
are you referring to the traditional DID base
: [asterisk-users] ILEC Interconnect: Basic MUX: M13 vs DCS: VT1.5
vs DS3
On 6/12/13, Don Kelly wrote:
> Is there an OC-n to SIP solution that makes sense?
>
> --Don
Hello Don, what will be coming out of the network discussed above would be SIP.
Kind Regar
Correction:
"I think VT1.5s mappings are more flexible?"
Sorry!
N.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
On 6/12/13, Don Kelly wrote:
> Is there an OC-n to SIP solution that makes sense?
>
> --Don
Hello Don, what will be coming out of the network discussed above would be SIP.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation P
Hello Brian,
Thank you so much
On 6/12/13, Brian LaVallee wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Going from DS1 to OC-n is a multi-step process. Typically requiring a
> hardware device to handle each MUX step. But you can find hardware that
> handles multiple MUX steps together.
The connection is coming i
Is there an OC-n to SIP solution that makes sense?
--Don
Hi Nick,
Going from DS1 to OC-n is a multi-step process. Typically requiring a
hardware device to handle each MUX step. But you can find hardware that
handles multiple MUX steps together.
VT1.5 is just a raw OC-n channel containing a
Hi Nick,
Going from DS1 to OC-n is a multi-step process. Typically requiring a
hardware device to handle each MUX step. But you can find hardware that
handles multiple MUX steps together.
VT1.5 is just a raw OC-n channel containing a single DS1.
An M13 device converts between DS3 and DS1.
A DA
11 matches
Mail list logo