Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-23 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister
Am Freitag, den 22.12.2006, 09:53 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:
 Wow what a mess! I can imagine how much easier it would be if the world
 adopted a country/area/exchange scheme like in the US with known length.
 It must be complicated in Germany just within the country. At least in the
 US we know what the length should be so if we don't have that we know the
 number is in error.
 
 Doug

Having variable length offers several advantages, it just makes life
harder for telcos (and telco-lookalikes like us ;)

- Companies with several phones can have DDI, possibly multi-digit, but
(as convention) the -0 always is the central phone desk. So if you do
not know the number of the person, but just the company (which would be
listed in the yellow pages), you call the -0 and ask to be transferred.

For example if I need to speak to the University library, I just call
73-0 (local call), and they transfer to extensions 73-1234.

I prefer this a lot over the system it seems the US as well as UK use a
lot, where you always dial a fixed-length number, the call is connected
(from which moment on you are charged for the call--- this was really
expensive if international tariffs applied) and a recorded message asks
you to dial a four-digit extension or 0 for assistance. I like our
system better, as it allows for all those nice digital phone features
like Callback-on-Called-Party-ends-call (if the remote side was on a
call, so the busy indication works without additional charge),
Callback-After-First-Call-Of-Remote-Party (where, if nobody was
available, the network will notifiy after the other side got off-hooked
and on-hooked again), and whatever there is.

- And then, in small populated areas that got their own area code
nonetheless, they handed out short numbers. Nowadays with ISDN lines
(which give you three up to 10 numbers) being so popular, VoIP
geographic numbers taking their share etc, the number room became full
in those areas. So they just took free 3-digit codes and made 6-digit
blocks out of them. No problem with digital switches on the telco side.

Here in Bonn (area 228) policy was that every new landline gets one
(analogue line) or three (ISDN) 7-digit numbers, and if you apply for up
to 7 more numbers, which was free until 2005, you would get 8-digit
numbers. Lots of 6-digit numbers are still in use (handed out until the
late 90s), shorter numbers do not exist except for companies. How short
a number they have (plus DDI digits) depends on what they pay for it and
how many channels their trunk has. They will get 5-digit(+x) here for a
reasonable price, 4-digit will be rather expensive, and 2-/3-digit are
not available any more - those in use have been assigned in the 50ties
when the phone system was built. So the University, the DoD, the D.of
Foreign Affairs, the town hall, the police central station... caught
them, and bad luck for all the others.

Of course, Germany does not have something like area-split and similar
hassles - at least not for technical reasons. AFAIK there have been a
handful area code changes for political reasons during the last 50
years, and the eastern part of Germany got a completely new phone system
after the Iron Curtain fell - quite foresight to keep the 3x area codes
unused in the western phone system (except 30 which is Berlin - but that
in fact is eastern Germany as well, obviously).

I think the most recent area code changes were when the 0-800 numbers
came, because some area had the code 8001 or so. European standards and
their popularity in germany, ahem... :)

BR
Anselm


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-22 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 13:16, Fri 22 Dec 06, Rajeev Natarajan wrote:
 I think the + convention started off because different countries have
 different  international access codes. Well, on GSM networks, + can be a
 part of the number to represent the international access code ( the
 traditional access code in India is 00 for international).  So to call
 Digium, from my GSM phone, I can use 0018775468963 or +18775468963 and
 Allison will answer :)
 
 Rajeev
 
 On 12/22/06, Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does anyone
 actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used in
 the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID ignores
 it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however stored
 in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.

The + is indeed a 'wildcard' for international access code.
In our setup we dont provide it to the telco. In my GSM all
numbers have this prefix so I can take my GSM to every
country in the world and still dial my contacts. That's why
we also put that + in phonenumbers in our applications and
if we send it to asterisk it will be stripped.

The fun thing is, that I also use this schema for .nl
numbers, and that my provider is clever enough to find out
where my GSM is and charge national fee when I dial
+countrycode. while in the country of that code.

I think it's all a lot easier when we simple adopt this
schema and dial countrycodeareastation from now ;)

-- 

Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-22 Thread Anselm Martin Hoffmeister
Am Freitag, den 22.12.2006, 00:53 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:
 Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does anyone
 actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used in
 the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID ignores
 it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however stored
 in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.

The + is replaced by the telco you are connected to - by whatever the
local prefix for international call is. In the US and  Canada it will
be 011, in most parts of the world 00, and there is Russia with its
exotic 08 wait for beep 10... The + should work in GSM mobile
networks and most SIP providers seem to accept it.

For callerid, there seem to be several cases. One of my providers (the
others manage better and always give 00492281234567 formatted numbers)
gives CID as +491601234567 for calls from one German mobile network,
491637654321 from a second network and 02281234567 from landline, so
my dialplan has to cope with that such that my endpoints show the proper
number. This is done by the following logic:

If number begins with +, strip it.
If number begins with anything but 0, prepend 00.
If number begins with 0049, replace by 0.

Although in Germany you can dial 0049 (region) (number), readability
is better when there is only the 0 (region) (number) on the display -
especially as numbers tend to get long, and e.g. Grandstream BT-100 only
have a 12-digit display.

BTW the longest number I _think_ is planned in Germany is 9 digits after
the area code for 2- and 3-digit area codes, 8 for 4-, and 7 for 5-digit
areacodes. There is one exception though that I know of: One of our
ministeries has usually 55- numbers (55 being their number, then
four digits DDI), but their fax numbers are 8-digit. Thus resulting in
total in 011-49-228-55-87654321 from US, 18 digits.

If you can, leave room for long numbers.

BR
Anselm

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-22 Thread Doug Crompton
Wow what a mess! I can imagine how much easier it would be if the world
adopted a country/area/exchange scheme like in the US with known length.
It must be complicated in Germany just within the country. At least in the
US we know what the length should be so if we don't have that we know the
number is in error.

Doug


On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:

 Am Freitag, den 22.12.2006, 00:53 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:
  Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does anyone
  actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used in
  the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID ignores
  it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however stored
  in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.

 The + is replaced by the telco you are connected to - by whatever the
 local prefix for international call is. In the US and  Canada it will
 be 011, in most parts of the world 00, and there is Russia with its
 exotic 08 wait for beep 10... The + should work in GSM mobile
 networks and most SIP providers seem to accept it.

 For callerid, there seem to be several cases. One of my providers (the
 others manage better and always give 00492281234567 formatted numbers)
 gives CID as +491601234567 for calls from one German mobile network,
 491637654321 from a second network and 02281234567 from landline, so
 my dialplan has to cope with that such that my endpoints show the proper
 number. This is done by the following logic:

 If number begins with +, strip it.
 If number begins with anything but 0, prepend 00.
 If number begins with 0049, replace by 0.

 Although in Germany you can dial 0049 (region) (number), readability
 is better when there is only the 0 (region) (number) on the display -
 especially as numbers tend to get long, and e.g. Grandstream BT-100 only
 have a 12-digit display.

 BTW the longest number I _think_ is planned in Germany is 9 digits after
 the area code for 2- and 3-digit area codes, 8 for 4-, and 7 for 5-digit
 areacodes. There is one exception though that I know of: One of our
 ministeries has usually 55- numbers (55 being their number, then
 four digits DDI), but their fax numbers are 8-digit. Thus resulting in
 total in 011-49-228-55-87654321 from US, 18 digits.

 If you can, leave room for long numbers.

 BR
 Anselm

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-22 Thread Henry.L.Coleman
The + sign is grammatic only it just means your international dialing prefix
+ the country code etc.
So for dialing a number from Canada to the UK you would advertize the
number as + 44  xx etc. In Canada we dial 011 for international
calls so I would actually dial 01144 xxx etc.

Henry L.Coleman CEO
*VoIP-PBX* 1-866-415-5355
Toronto Ontario
Canada


 Wow what a mess! I can imagine how much easier it would be if the world
 adopted a country/area/exchange scheme like in the US with known length.
 It must be complicated in Germany just within the country. At least in the
 US we know what the length should be so if we don't have that we know the
 number is in error.

 Doug


 On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:

 Am Freitag, den 22.12.2006, 00:53 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:
  Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does
 anyone
  actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used
 in
  the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID
 ignores
  it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however
 stored
  in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.

 The + is replaced by the telco you are connected to - by whatever the
 local prefix for international call is. In the US and  Canada it will
 be 011, in most parts of the world 00, and there is Russia with its
 exotic 08 wait for beep 10... The + should work in GSM mobile
 networks and most SIP providers seem to accept it.

 For callerid, there seem to be several cases. One of my providers (the
 others manage better and always give 00492281234567 formatted numbers)
 gives CID as +491601234567 for calls from one German mobile network,
 491637654321 from a second network and 02281234567 from landline, so
 my dialplan has to cope with that such that my endpoints show the proper
 number. This is done by the following logic:

 If number begins with +, strip it.
 If number begins with anything but 0, prepend 00.
 If number begins with 0049, replace by 0.

 Although in Germany you can dial 0049 (region) (number), readability
 is better when there is only the 0 (region) (number) on the display -
 especially as numbers tend to get long, and e.g. Grandstream BT-100 only
 have a 12-digit display.

 BTW the longest number I _think_ is planned in Germany is 9 digits after
 the area code for 2- and 3-digit area codes, 8 for 4-, and 7 for 5-digit
 areacodes. There is one exception though that I know of: One of our
 ministeries has usually 55- numbers (55 being their number, then
 four digits DDI), but their fax numbers are 8-digit. Thus resulting in
 total in 011-49-228-55-87654321 from US, 18 digits.

 If you can, leave room for long numbers.

 BR
 Anselm

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)

 
 *  Doug Crompton *
 *  Richboro, PA 18954*
 *  215-431-6307  *
 **
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
 * http://www.crompton.com  *
 


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-22 Thread John Novack
I agree, also have had this religious argument with an international 
telephony professional who disagrees
He doesn't see that the variable length numbering (lack of ) plan can 
really become a problem
On a similar note, since the NANP has become all electronic, there 
should never have been another area code split. It is costly to business 
and confusing to distant users who, after the passage of time try to 
locate someone in the now split off area code.
Area codes are slowly losing their meaning as well, with LNP and VOIP 
services offering an NPA unrelated to geography
With number assignments now mostly left in the laps of bureaucrats, the 
NANP will soon be in the same mess as the rest of the world.


John Novack


Doug Crompton wrote:

Wow what a mess! I can imagine how much easier it would be if the world
adopted a country/area/exchange scheme like in the US with known length.
It must be complicated in Germany just within the country. At least in the
US we know what the length should be so if we don't have that we know the
number is in error.

Doug


On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:

  

Am Freitag, den 22.12.2006, 00:53 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:


Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does anyone
actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used in
the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID ignores
it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however stored
in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.
  

The + is replaced by the telco you are connected to - by whatever the
local prefix for international call is. In the US and  Canada it will
be 011, in most parts of the world 00, and there is Russia with its
exotic 08 wait for beep 10... The + should work in GSM mobile
networks and most SIP providers seem to accept it.

For callerid, there seem to be several cases. One of my providers (the
others manage better and always give 00492281234567 formatted numbers)
gives CID as +491601234567 for calls from one German mobile network,
491637654321 from a second network and 02281234567 from landline, so
my dialplan has to cope with that such that my endpoints show the proper
number. This is done by the following logic:

If number begins with +, strip it.
If number begins with anything but 0, prepend 00.
If number begins with 0049, replace by 0.

Although in Germany you can dial 0049 (region) (number), readability
is better when there is only the 0 (region) (number) on the display -
especially as numbers tend to get long, and e.g. Grandstream BT-100 only
have a 12-digit display.

BTW the longest number I _think_ is planned in Germany is 9 digits after
the area code for 2- and 3-digit area codes, 8 for 4-, and 7 for 5-digit
areacodes. There is one exception though that I know of: One of our
ministeries has usually 55- numbers (55 being their number, then
four digits DDI), but their fax numbers are 8-digit. Thus resulting in
total in 011-49-228-55-87654321 from US, 18 digits.

If you can, leave room for long numbers.

BR
Anselm

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

  

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-21 Thread Doug

Does anyone know the maximum number of
digits for an international phone number?

Doing some searching, it looks like 16
numbers including the 011 is the
maximum number, because 17 is just not
found:

OK:1234567890123456
http://www.google.com/search?q=011X

Not OK:12345678901234567
http://www.google.com/search?q=011XX


This fellow includes 011x.T in his dial
plan.  Will this provide for more than 16 
numbers?http://www.vovida.org/pipermail/mgcp/2003-November/001848.html


Does anyone have some definitive sources for
this subject?



Other info:
http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-users@lists.digium.com/msg37207.html


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-21 Thread Peter Bowyer

On 21/12/06, Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does anyone know the maximum number of
digits for an international phone number?

Doing some searching, it looks like 16
numbers including the 011 is the
maximum number, because 17 is just not
found:

OK:1234567890123456
http://www.google.com/search?q=011X

Not OK:12345678901234567
http://www.google.com/search?q=011XX


Why would you imagine that people in non-US countries would list their
phone numbers on their websites in US International dialing format?
Especially when more countries use '00' for their outbound
international prefix than use '011'.

As has already been mentioned recently, at least one country (Germany)
has no hard limit on the length of a number - extra digits after the
base number are delivered to the CPE for internal routing - kind-of
self-administered DDI ranges.

Peter

--
Peter Bowyer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-21 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 22:56, Thu 21 Dec 06, Peter Bowyer wrote:
 On 21/12/06, Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anyone know the maximum number of
 digits for an international phone number?
 
 Doing some searching, it looks like 16
 numbers including the 011 is the
 maximum number, because 17 is just not
 found:
 
 OK:1234567890123456
 http://www.google.com/search?q=011X
 
 Not OK:12345678901234567
 http://www.google.com/search?q=011XX
 
 Why would you imagine that people in non-US countries would list their
 phone numbers on their websites in US International dialing format?
 Especially when more countries use '00' for their outbound
 international prefix than use '011'.
 
 As has already been mentioned recently, at least one country (Germany)
 has no hard limit on the length of a number - extra digits after the
 base number are delivered to the CPE for internal routing - kind-of
 self-administered DDI ranges.

As far as I can remember (and our ITSP is telling us to do)
the 'dial international' code will be gone soon.
In our case we have to provide the number like this:
country coderegionendpoint[extra digits]
So for a dutch number you send: 31318787243
31 == .nl
318 == my local region
787243 == my endpoint

I see this more and more. not only ITSP, also PSTN providers
and cellphone providers.

cellphone providers use this most of the time:
+countryregionendpont
The above number looks like:
+31318787243

Try to get that from your telco, it makes life way more
easy.
-- 

Michiel van Baak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD

Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-21 Thread Doug Crompton
Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does anyone
actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used in
the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID ignores
it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however stored
in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.

Doug


On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Michiel van Baak wrote:

 The above number looks like:
 +31318787243

 Try to get that from your telco, it makes life way more
 easy.
 --

 Michiel van Baak
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://michiel.vanbaak.eu

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-21 Thread Rajeev Natarajan

I think the + convention started off because different countries have
different  international access codes. Well, on GSM networks, + can be a
part of the number to represent the international access code ( the
traditional access code in India is 00 for international).  So to call
Digium, from my GSM phone, I can use 0018775468963 or +18775468963 and
Allison will answer :)

Rajeev

On 12/22/06, Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does anyone
actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used in
the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID ignores
it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however stored
in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.

Doug


On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Michiel van Baak wrote:

 The above number looks like:
 +31318787243

 Try to get that from your telco, it makes life way more
 easy.
 --

 Michiel van Baak
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://michiel.vanbaak.eu

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users