Hi,
I am working on call packing feature of asterisk. Call packing is working
fine but I want to make this feature as multi tenant.
exp:-
*for A client*
packing extension are
parkext = 700
parkpos = 701-720
context = parkedcalls_A
parkingtime = 45
*for B client
*packing extension are
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of UxBoD
Sent: Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:16
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Multi-Tenant Parking
Should that not say parkinglot
Have you looked at this?
http://www.google.com/#q=app_valetparking
I have - but would rather use the inbuilt functionality if possible before
resorting to third-party code...
IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENT
Computer viruses - It is your responsibility to scan this email and any
] Multi-Tenant Parking
Should that not say parkinglot and not parkinglog in features.conf?
It should – but that’s not a cut and paste, as the asterisk setup is on a
separate, non-connected network, and I just retyped it out – not cut/paste.
It’s spelt correctly in the real system (typo on here
Has anyone managed to get multi-parking lot call parking working correctly?
I've had several attempts at it, and never seem to be able to get it to go
properly - (actually, at all):
I've most recently done this with 1.6.1.x, and now 1.6.2.x, with no luck in
either case. What I've been trying
At 23:57 1/11/2010, Michael Wyres wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary=_004_11FDCFCDD2B4B0439630AEC725D1635D1BAC56FDC4ssyd10exinter_;
type=multipart/alternative
Has anyone managed to get multi-parking lot call
parking working correctly? Ive had
Should that not say parkinglot and not parkinglog in features.conf?
-
Sent from Zimbra and my iPhone!
SplatNIX IT Services :: Innovation through collaboration
On 12 Jan 2010, at 06:03, Michael Wyres mwy...@cdm.com.au wrote:
Has anyone managed to get
Hello, all. My apologies for troubling the developer list as an end
user but we were not able to resolve this issue on the user list and it
is smelling like a possible bug when using multi-tenant call parking.
There seem to be two problems:
1. Parking assigns parking spaces from the default
Oops! Thought I had changed to address! My apologies - John
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 13:29 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. My apologies for troubling the developer list as an end
user but we were not able to resolve this issue on the user list and it
is smelling like a possible
Jonathan Thurman jthurma...@gmail.com writes:
Sorry, I am relatively new to the Asterisk project and probably don't
fully understand how the release cycle for this project works. Are you
saying that the minor releases are only for security bugs?
Minor releases aren't only for security bugs,
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 07:17 -0700, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:42 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 07:17 -0700, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful folks, our brand new
multi-tenant setup seems to be working smoothly from start to finish
with just a bump or two. The biggest is parking. Now that we got most
kinks worked out, I'm a little more comfortable in trying to resolve
this.
There seem
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful folks, our brand new
multi-tenant setup seems to be working smoothly from start to finish
with just a bump or two. The biggest is parking. Now that we got most
kinks worked out,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful folks, our brand new
multi-tenant setup seems to be working smoothly from start to
This has been fixed in the 1.6.1 SVN, and you will have to back
port a patch until these changes are rolled into another release. I was
disappointed that more bug fixes were not included in 1.6.1.1.
-Jonathan
Asterisk 1.6.1.1 was released
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 07:17 -0700, Jonathan Thurman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:53 PM, John A. Sullivan III
jsulli...@opensourcedevel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 02:17 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. With the assistance of very helpful
This has been fixed in the 1.6.1 SVN, and you will have to back port a
patch until these changes are rolled into another release. I was
disappointed that more bug fixes were not included in 1.6.1.1.
-Jonathan
Asterisk 1.6.1.1 was released for a security issue, AST-2009-001. Why
would
18 matches
Mail list logo
