Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-08 Thread Sebastian Milioto
ke a > >> seperate > >> isolated vlan for the PCs, this will restrict traffic between the > >> clients. > >> > >> > >> Rgds, > >> Vineet Bhojnagarwala RCDD, NTS, OSP > >> Spear Networks Pvt Ltd > >> Integr

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-07 Thread James Lamanna
ggested, make a >> seperate >> isolated vlan for the PCs, this will restrict traffic between the >> clients. >> >> >> Rgds, >> Vineet Bhojnagarwala RCDD, NTS, OSP >> Spear Networks Pvt Ltd >> Integration & Consultancy >> +91-9831436607 >> On

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-07 Thread James Lamanna
mp; Consultancy > +91-9831436607 > On May 6, 2010, at 11:30 PM, "David White" > wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com on behalf of Noah Miller > Sent: Thu 5/6/2010 10:41 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Vineet Bhojnagarwala
m.com on behalf of Noah Miller Sent: Thu 5/6/2010 10:41 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922 >>> It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will have a PC and a IP >>> Phone. Every room connected t

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Vineet Bhojnagarwala
on Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922 >>> It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will have a PC and a IP >>> Phone. Every room connected to a switch Cisco 2950. >>> I want keeping all PCs isolated behind a NAT (no access to neighbour's

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! > > Should I take another approach on that? > > Put each PC in its own VLAN. Keep all the phones in one VLAN. Note: VLANs are an organisational tool, and do not really add security. If you want to go with VLANs in thise case then rather consider port based VLAN (configured in the switch o

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Sebastian Milioto wrote: > I see the following in SPA922 System tab (new firmware) > > VLAN Settings Enable VLAN:yesnoEnable CDP:yesno VLAN ID:PC Port VLAN Highest > Priority:01234567No Limit Enable PC Port VLAN Tagging:yesnoPC Port VLAN ID: > VLAN ID:1 for all Phones, and VL

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread David White
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com on behalf of Noah Miller Sent: Thu 5/6/2010 10:41 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922 >>> It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Sebastian Milioto
I see the following in SPA922 System tab (new firmware) VLAN Settings Enable VLAN:yesnoEnable CDP:yesno VLAN ID:PC Port VLAN Highest Priority:01234567No Limit Enable PC Port VLAN Tagging:yesnoPC Port VLAN ID: VLAN ID:1 for all Phones, and VLAN 2, 3, 4, 5..,24 for each PC. This should work, rig

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Noah Miller
>> It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will have a PC and a IP >> Phone. Every room connected to a switch Cisco 2950. >> I want keeping all PCs isolated behind a NAT (no access to neighbour's PC), >> and still keep communication in same LAN between all IP Phones. >> >> Should I tak

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Sebastian Milioto wrote: > It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will have a PC and a IP > Phone. Every room connected to a switch Cisco 2950. > I want keeping all PCs isolated behind a NAT (no access to neighbour's PC), > and still keep communication in same LA

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Sebastian Milioto
It is a building, with 24 separated rooms, each room will have a PC and a IP Phone. Every room connected to a switch Cisco 2950. I want keeping all PCs isolated behind a NAT (no access to neighbour's PC), and still keep communication in same LAN between all IP Phones. Should I take another approac

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Noah Miller
>> Ok..So what ip phone model do NAT? > > I think you'd struggle to find one. If it's a requirement you're probably > doing something wrong... Definitely get a router. Plug the IP phone into the router, and then you can plug the computer into the phone or the router. - Noah -- __

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Steve Howes
On 6 May 2010, at 14:16, Sebastian Milioto wrote: > Ok..So what ip phone model do NAT? I think you'd struggle to find one. If it's a requirement you're probably doing something wrong... S -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provid

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-06 Thread Sebastian Milioto
Ok..So what ip phone model do NAT? Sebastian On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Luki wrote: > >> However, when I connect a PC to that port, SPA922 works as bridge. > > Exactly. The SPA9x2 has a 2-port switch; no NAT, no routing (unlike > the SPA2102, etc). > > I think the 5.1 series is the lates

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-05 Thread Luki
>> However, when I connect a PC to that port, SPA922 works as bridge. Exactly. The SPA9x2 has a 2-port switch; no NAT, no routing (unlike the SPA2102, etc). I think the 5.1 series is the latest firmware for the 922; the the 942, there is 6.1.5a. Luki --

Re: [asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-05 Thread Steve Howes
On 5 May 2010, at 14:39, Sebastian Milioto wrote: > However, when I connect a PC to that port, SPA922 works as bridge. > > Anybody can confirm SPA922 can NAT a PC connected to its LAN port? Does exist > such LAN tab for setting up parameters as port forwarding? > (by the way, version is 5.1.15

[asterisk-users] OT: NAT in SPA922

2010-05-05 Thread Sebastian Milioto
Hi all, I've just bought some SPA922. First time with this hardware for me. I see no LAN tab in its web GUI where I can setup NAT for PC conected to its LAN ethernet port. However, when I connect a PC to that port, SPA922 works as bridge. Anybody can confirm SPA922 can NAT a PC connected to its L