Re: [asterisk-users] PRI - Native ZAP bridge fails - Is this my patch?

2010-04-30 Thread Klaus Darilion
The disconnect is RECEIVED by Asterisk. So there is a problem with the other party. You are sending FACILITY - maybe the other party does not like FACILITY and hangs up. IIRC there is a setting in zapata.conf to enable/disable FACILITY. regards klaus Am 10.04.2010 21:46, schrieb bruce bruce:

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI - Native ZAP bridge fails - Is this my patch?

2010-04-30 Thread bruce bruce
Thanks. Yeah, that was the issue. I was requesting RLT and it wasn't turned ON with the provider. Your mentioned solution fixed it. -Bruce On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Klaus Darilion klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at wrote: The disconnect is RECEIVED by Asterisk. So there is a problem with the

Re: [asterisk-users] PRI - Native ZAP bridge fails - Is this my patch?

2010-04-11 Thread bruce bruce
Hi Guys, Has anyone experienced this? Can I have a PRI guru weigh in on this? Thanks, Bruce On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:46 PM, bruce bruce bruceb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, I am calling out 416-999- on Channel 1 of PRI and then calling 416-999- on Channel 2 of PRI. When the two

[asterisk-users] PRI - Native ZAP bridge fails - Is this my patch?

2010-04-10 Thread bruce bruce
Hi Guys, I am calling out 416-999- on Channel 1 of PRI and then calling 416-999- on Channel 2 of PRI. When the two channels are going to be ZAP native bridged, both channels hangup and CLI show PRI cause (16). Asterisk Verbose *(Channel 1 already connected to party)*: -- Requested