Hi,
Probably I did not explain my situation before asking the question.
I have been working with epygi fxo gateways(www.epygi.com) for some
time. They are 6 port fxo gateways, but they fail(hang) when it comes
to high traffic on the 6 POTS, resulting to not-so-happy clients. In my
country,
I'm afraid I don't really follow you:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:45:54AM +0300, James Mutuku wrote:
They are 6 port fxo gateways,
but they fail(hang) when it comes to high traffic on the 6 POTS,
Could you please give a better definition to high traffic?
Or is it just the issue of not
Michael,
I agree. Here we use e1s(which have even more channels). Some clients
just don't want to change some if their old infrastructure.
Thanks
Michael Graves wrote:
I just hafta ask, why does one face down a requirement for 48 FXOs?
Would it not be more practical to have 2 T-1s dropped
Some customers are locked into two year contracts.
That was the answer I got when adding four POTS lines to a system with
four BRIs...
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:39 PM, James Mutuku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
I agree. Here we use e1s(which have even more
And there are people like me who still can't get PRI's for less than
$1100/month. (Granted, I doubt I'll ever need a pri for the business I
am with now, but I was with an ISP for a long time that still supported
dial-up and we had 8 PRI's with a bulk discount that got them for us at
Brian,
I agree with you. Google has all the answers, but not the
experience. The reason I use lists is to get opinions 'experienced'
users. From experience, product manuals say one thing and when the
rubber meets the road, its a different story.
Thanks though for your kind comments
Steve,
Thanks for the responses. I am talking of 45 POTS
Thanks
Steve Totaro wrote:
Sorry,
Quantify High Traffic
How many POTS lines are we talking about?
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Adtran or Adit, I think Rhino
Adit 600 48 FXO.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:11 PM, James Mutuku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve,
Thanks for the responses. I am talking of 45 POTS
Thanks
Steve Totaro wrote:
Sorry,
Quantify High Traffic
How many POTS lines are we talking about?
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Sun, Jun
I just hafta ask, why does one face down a requirement for 48 FXOs?
Would it not be more practical to have 2 T-1s dropped into the
location?
Michael
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:35:35 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
Adit 600 48 FXO.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:11 PM, James Mutuku [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I need to get an fxo gateway/card for a high traffic asterisk
installation. Please advice on which gateway/ fxo cards
Thanks
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or
I would suggest a channel bank populated with FXO cards muxing to a T1.
Thanks,
Steve T
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:06 AM, James Mutuku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need to get an fxo gateway/card for a high traffic asterisk
installation. Please advice on which gateway/ fxo cards
Thanks
Please advice on channel bank
Steve Totaro wrote:
I would suggest a channel bank populated with FXO cards muxing to a T1.
Thanks,
Steve T
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:06 AM, James Mutuku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need to get an fxo gateway/card for a high traffic asterisk
I use Adtran or Adit, I think Rhino has a pretty low priced one but I
have never used so cannot comment. I can tell you that the Adtran or
Adit is rock solid.
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:43 AM, James Mutuku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please advice on channel bank
Steve
Sorry,
Quantify High Traffic
How many POTS lines are we talking about?
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Steve Totaro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Adtran or Adit, I think Rhino has a pretty low priced one but I
have never used so cannot comment. I can tell you that
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 17:43 +0300, James Mutuku wrote:
Please advice on channel bank
Dude. There's the cool new website you should check out. It's
www.google.com.
Seriously. This list is not full of people waiting to do the simplest
research at your request. Spend a few minutes and do some
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Brian J. Murrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 17:43 +0300, James Mutuku wrote:
Please advice on channel bank
Dude. There's the cool new website you should check out. It's
www.google.com.
Seriously. This list is not full of people
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 11:03 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Brian J. Murrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 17:43 +0300, James Mutuku wrote:
Please advice on channel bank
Dude. There's the cool new website you should check out. It's
17 matches
Mail list logo
