Re: [asterisk-users] Question about SIP registration

2010-01-13 Thread Aggio Alberto
Of Robert Lister Sent: martedì 12 gennaio 2010 18.51 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Question about SIP registration On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:16 +0100, Aggio Alberto wrote: Then I have configured an account as following: [999] type

[asterisk-users] Question about SIP registration

2010-01-12 Thread Aggio Alberto
Hi guys, I recently faced an issue regarding SIP registration: I have a 2-NIC Linux PC, with eth0 set to address 192.168.1.1 (NATted over public network, with address 89.X.Y.Z) and eth1 set to address 1.1.1.1. In [sip.conf] I set general option bindaddr=0.0.0.0; IP address to

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about SIP registration

2010-01-12 Thread Warren Selby
Instead of host=dynamic, use host=1.1.1.1, or host=1.1.1.0/255.255.255.0. Thanks, --Warren Selby On Jan 12, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Aggio Alberto alberto.ag...@loquendo.com wrote: Hi guys, I recently faced an issue regarding SIP registration: I have a 2-NIC Linux PC, with eth0 set to

Re: [asterisk-users] Question about SIP registration

2010-01-12 Thread Robert Lister
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:16 +0100, Aggio Alberto wrote: Then I have configured an account as following: [999] type=friend username=999 You don't appear to have a secret= line in there with a password option... or did you snip it? Can someone explain me this kind of behaviour? Is it