On 27 Oct 2006, at 16:42, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
Hi
Which is most resistant to the loss of packages in a dirty link ?
SIP or IAX ?
Well there isn't much in it at the protocol level, at least in terms
of the
odd packet being lost. IAX does have an advantage when it comes to
the
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 13:08 -0700, Martin Joseph wrote:
On 2006-10-26 09:21:20 -0700, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Since they are incorporated in a single product which is doing the
configuration, consistency where possible would be good...
That product is designed to link the two
Hi
Which is most resistant to the loss of packages in a dirty link ? SIP or IAX ?
roberto
2006/10/27, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 13:08 -0700, Martin Joseph wrote:
On 2006-10-26 09:21:20 -0700, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Since they are
On 2006-10-26 09:21:20 -0700, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:43 +0200, Pavel Jezek wrote:
with SIP qualify, I can specify, what time in delay I will accept,
with sip and setting qualify=3000 I can circumvent this anoying
messages (bacause delay in reply is about
