Re: [asterisk-users] Re: SIP v IAX2
On 27 Oct 2006, at 16:42, Roberto Pereyra wrote: Hi Which is most resistant to the loss of packages in a dirty link ? SIP or IAX ? Well there isn't much in it at the protocol level, at least in terms of the odd packet being lost. IAX does have an advantage when it comes to the link dropping completely. IAX will detect total packet loss (in either direction) and hang up the call after about 30 seconds. SIP can often not notice the RTP stream has died (esp if the control channel is still up) leaving you with half a call hanging around. Tim Panton www.mexuar.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: SIP v IAX2
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 13:08 -0700, Martin Joseph wrote: On 2006-10-26 09:21:20 -0700, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Since they are incorporated in a single product which is doing the configuration, consistency where possible would be good... That product is designed to link the two things together, are you suggesting lowest common denominator configuration? Surely the best is to exploit each to it's maximum to achieve that goal even if it does make for slight differences in configuration, it is the day to day phone user experience that really matters. In computing inconsistances exist everywhere it is the job of a sysadmin to sort all this out so that it is transparent to the users. Sorry for the rant, I'm just going to a client to sort out the problems created, yet again, by his incompetent so called sysadmin. -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: SIP v IAX2
Hi Which is most resistant to the loss of packages in a dirty link ? SIP or IAX ? roberto 2006/10/27, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 13:08 -0700, Martin Joseph wrote: On 2006-10-26 09:21:20 -0700, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Since they are incorporated in a single product which is doing the configuration, consistency where possible would be good... That product is designed to link the two things together, are you suggesting lowest common denominator configuration? Surely the best is to exploit each to it's maximum to achieve that goal even if it does make for slight differences in configuration, it is the day to day phone user experience that really matters. In computing inconsistances exist everywhere it is the job of a sysadmin to sort all this out so that it is transparent to the users. Sorry for the rant, I'm just going to a client to sort out the problems created, yet again, by his incompetent so called sysadmin. -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Ing. Roberto Pereyra ContenidosOnline Looking for Linux Virtual Private Servers ? Click here: http://www.spry.com/hosting-affiliate/scripts/t.php?a_aid=426a_bid=56 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: SIP v IAX2
On 2006-10-26 09:21:20 -0700, Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:43 +0200, Pavel Jezek wrote: with SIP qualify, I can specify, what time in delay I will accept, with sip and setting qualify=3000 I can circumvent this anoying messages (bacause delay in reply is about 2000ms, and I accept 3000ms) with iax, qualify is working different, so setting qualify=3000 will ping peer every 3s, quite inconsistent, imho So are you saying that in your world two different things, created by totally different people, must have the same configuration settings. Since they are incorporated in a single product which is doing the configuration, consistency where possible would be good... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
