On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:11:30 -0600, Tilghman Lesher
wrote:
>By the way, you are likely to have trouble running Asterisk on uClinux,
>anyway. There are a lot of assumptions in the code related to fork(2)
>creating a separate address space. As this is not true with vfork(2),
>there are parts of As
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 02:28:29 -0600, Tilghman Lesher
wrote:
>1. uClinux has no fork(2) call, only a vfork(2) call. Therefore, these
>amount to multiple processes sharing the same address space. In fact,
>it's very likely that these are multiple threads, not processes at all.
>2. The unit is in
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
By the way, you are likely to have trouble running Asterisk on uClinux,
anyway. There are a lot of assumptions in the code related to fork(2)
creating a separate address space. As this is not true with vfork(2),
there are parts of Asterisk that will
On Sunday 30 January 2011 02:28:29 Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Saturday 29 January 2011 04:52:02 Gilles wrote:
> > 2. Provided each process is indeed using 11.990 bytes, is it possible
> > to reduce the number of concurrent processes, considering the fact
> > that this appliance will not handle mor
On Saturday 29 January 2011 04:52:02 Gilles wrote:
> Hello
>
> On a uClinux-based appliance, "ps aux" shows multiple Asterisk
> processes:
>
> 380 root 11990 S asterisk -f
> 381 root 11990 S asterisk -f
> 383 root 11990 S asterisk -f
> 384 root 11990 S asterisk
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:29:02 -0500, "William Stillwell"
wrote:
>My asterisk runs with the -f option.
>
>ps aux | grep ast
>root 5475 0.0 0.0 61256 748 pts/0S+ 11:28 0:00 grep ast
>root 25937 0.0 0.0 65956 616 pts/1SJan27 0:00 /bin/sh
>/usr/sbin/safe_asterisk
>r
> -Original Message-
> From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-
> boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gilles
> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 11:20 AM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Reducing
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:11:35 +0330, Pezhman Lali
wrote:
>it's the default setting of asterisk.conf, your config is not complete.
>-f in the ps output, shows your asterisk have been run in fork mode, disable
>it.
Thanks for the tip. I looked around in /etc/asterisk, but found no
info about the num
Dear
it's the default setting of asterisk.conf, your config is not complete.
-f in the ps output, shows your asterisk have been run in fork mode, disable
it.
[directories](!) ; remove the (!) to enable this
astetcdir => /etc/asterisk
astmoddir => /usr/lib/asterisk/modules
astvarlibdir => /var/lib/
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 15:47:53 +0330, Pezhman Lali
wrote:
>check your /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf and post it here
Here goes:
root:/var/tmp> cat /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf
[directories]
astetcdir => /etc/asterisk
astmoddir => /usr/lib/asterisk/modules
astvarlibdir => /var/lib/asterisk
astagidir
check your /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf and post it here
best
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Hello
>
> On a uClinux-based appliance, "ps aux" shows multiple Asterisk
> processes:
>
> 380 root 11990 S asterisk -f
> 381 root 11990 S asterisk -f
> 383 root 1
Hello
On a uClinux-based appliance, "ps aux" shows multiple Asterisk
processes:
380 root 11990 S asterisk -f
381 root 11990 S asterisk -f
383 root 11990 S asterisk -f
384 root 11990 S asterisk -f
385 root 11990 S asterisk -f
386 root 11990 S a
12 matches
Mail list logo
