Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 01 July 2010 20:45:14 John Novack wrote: John Ervin wrote: Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious. It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored. Further searching shows there is NO written rule regarding top bottom or even

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread John Novack
Tilghman Lesher wrote: On Thursday 01 July 2010 20:45:14 John Novack wrote: John Ervin wrote: Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious. It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored. Further searching shows there is

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread Steve Howes
On 2 Jul 2010, at 12:29, John Novack wrote: regardless, people will post either way, and wasting archive space complaining about either one is pointless. I was mainly pissed off about him directly replying to people (i.e. me) rather than the list. troll It was you lot that started the

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread unserossi
: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue n 2 Jul 2010, at 12:29, John Novack wrote: regardless, people will post either way, and wasting archive space complaining about either one is pointless. I was mainly pissed off about him directly replying to people (i.e. me) rather han the list. troll

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-02 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman Lesher Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 3:55 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID

[asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread unserossi
Hi, i have the same problem. Trying to use the dialplan function CONNECTEDLINE() this way Set(CONNECTEDLINE(name)=${SIPPEER(${EXTEN},callerid_name)}) Set(CONNECTEDLINE(num)=${EXTEN}) ends with [Jul 1 16:30:50] ERROR[3954]: pbx.c:2902 ast_func_write: Function

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Steve Howes
On 1 Jul 2010, at 15:52, unsero...@aol.com wrote: [Jul 1 16:30:50] ERROR[3954]: pbx.c:2902 ast_func_write: Function CONNECTEDLINE not registered Same happens trying function CALLEDID. I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.20. What do i have to do to use this function or alternatively the

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Andrew Latham
Only in trunk...(1.8) ~ Andrew lathama Latham lath...@gmail.com * Learn more about OSS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software * Learn more about Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux * Learn more about Tux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tux On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Steve

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread unserossi
Sorry, what does this mean? Only in trunk? -Original Message- From: Steve Howes steve-li...@geekinter.net To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thu, Jul 1, 2010 5:02 pm Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Andrew Latham
: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue On 1 Jul 2010, at 15:52, unsero...@aol.com wrote: [Jul 1 16:30:50] ERROR[3954]: pbx.c:2902 ast_func_write: Function CONNECTEDLINE not registered Same happens trying function CALLEDID. I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.20. What do i have to do to use

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Steve Howes
On 1 Jul 2010, at 16:25, unsero...@aol.com wrote: Sorry, what does this mean? Only in trunk? If you look in the post you quoted This feature is in Asterisk trunk and will be present in the upcoming 1.8 release. First sentence. S --

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Steve Howes
On 1 Jul 2010, at 16:56, unsero...@aol.com wrote: Sorry, i wanted to know what is in trunk means. So it seems to mean is in the pipeline for the next version. DON'T reply to people off list. And stop bloody top posting. Steve --

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Adam Moffett
DON'T reply to people off list. And stop bloody top posting. Steve Is bottom posting your personal preference or is that a rule on this list? I have personally always found top posting easier to follow because the newer content is at the top. --

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Danny Nicholas
-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:37 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue DON'T reply to people off list. And stop bloody top posting. Steve

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread John Novack
A religious argument that will not be resolved or go away Top posting to some doesn't work because of their mail clients Bottom posting is a PITA to many because some don't trim off signatures and other un-necessary text. Much archive space and bandwidth is wasted on this subject, which will not

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Danny Nicholas
TY, John. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Novack Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 3:06 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Thursday 01 July 2010 15:01:45 Danny Nicholas wrote: On Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:37 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: Steve Howes wrote: DON'T reply to people off list. And stop bloody top posting. Is bottom posting your personal preference or is that a rule on this list? I have personally

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Mike Ely
As an interesting aside, every email I get on this list coming from Tilghman Lesher is marked with a To Do flag by my email client. Every single one. I don't have any inbound filter that would explain the behavior either. On 7/1/10 1:15 PM, Tilghman Lesher tles...@digium.com wrote: On

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Mike Ely
Sorry to answer my own question here - had a look at the headers of Tilghman's last email and it contained this: X-message-flag: Major security vulnerability detected! You should shutdown your computer immediately and upgrade to Ubuntu Linux 8.04 or later. Cute. Leaving aside the fact

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman Lesher Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 3:16 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread John Ervin
Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious. It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- _ -- Bandwidth and

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread John Novack
John Ervin wrote: Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious. It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored. One might go here : http://www.asterisk.org/support/mailing-lists But the link to rules is broken!! John Novack -- Dog is my Co-pilot

Re: [asterisk-users] Remote Party ID issue

2010-07-01 Thread John Novack
John Ervin wrote: Where are the rules for posting in this discussion group? Just curious. It's a rule on this list, although it's frequently ignored. Further searching shows there is NO written rule regarding top bottom or even sideways posting http://www.asterisk.org/community/rules Which