On 26/10/06, Guillermo Salas M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about the bandwidth used for both protocols? Is IAX using less or
more bandwidth than SIP?
I'll give you an actual measured result.
A trunked IAX2 link, carrying 30 simultaneous calls using
variable-bit-rate Speex - we saw 7
Hi Jon,
Well Skype was one of the reasons I started my Asterisk based business.
I first came across a VoIP demo about 12 years ago in a teleco carrier in
Altanta GA.
At that time the technology was very primitive (most people still had dial
up lines). Anyway, to cut a long story short it wasn't
But how do you deal with the cable co blocking the ports you need for
SIP?
Best regards,
Al Bochter
Bochter Services
http://www.BochterServices.com/?t=Email
Are you outside of the US?
Do you need to call US Toll Free Numbers?
We can help you save money on calling US toll free numbers.
Email
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP
v IAX2
But how do you deal with the cable co blocking the
ports you need for SIP?
Best regards,Al BochterBochter Serviceshttp://www.BochterServices.com/?t=EmailAre you outside of the US?Do you need to call US Toll Free Numbers?We can help you save
Discussion
Subject: Re:
[asterisk-users] SIP
v IAX2
But how do you deal with the
cable co blocking the
ports you need for SIP?
Best regards,
Al Bochter
Bochter Services
http://www.BochterServices.com/?t=Email
Are you outside of the US?
Do you need to call US Toll Free
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Bochter
Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2006
9:55 AM
To: Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP
v IAX2
VOIP is NOT telephone so the FCC don't have anything
to say about VOIP.
Well not right now.
But in CAN there are cable co
: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP v IAX2
VOIP is NOT telephone so the FCC don't have anything to say about VOIP.
Well not right now.
But in CAN there are cable co. that block the SIP ports and there is an up
charge for them to unblock SIP.
Ask Vonage..
Best regards,
Al Bochter
Bochter
On 2 Nov 2006, at 14:54, Al Bochter wrote:
VOIP is NOT telephone so the FCC don't have anything to say about
VOIP.
Well not right now.
But in CAN there are cable co. that block the SIP ports and there
is an up charge for them to unblock SIP.
Ask Vonage..
Yet another advantage of
] SIP v IAX2
Dean,
I am going ways offtopic on this one, but I must say that although I
am not from the US, I am finding the repetitive bad communications and
VoIP legislation being voted in the US disturbing. Having in mind the
CALEA Act (as an outrageous example of such bad legislation yet
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP v IAX2
Dean,
I am going ways offtopic on this one, but I must say that although I
am not from the US, I am finding the repetitive bad communications and
VoIP legislation being voted in the US disturbing. Having
Henry.L.Coleman wrote:
Its a bit like the VHS vs Beta war, both systems have their good and bad
points In the end, sales/marketing perception will always win regardless
of better technologies.
That will be Skype then ;-)
--
Jon Farmer
Telford, Shropshire, UK
I had a slide on this at my astricon presentation last week (about
developing our IAX/java softphone)
The slide basically said that I did IAX instead of SIP because the
IAX draft RFC is ~100 pages
whereas there are 100 RFCs on SIP/STUN/RTP - That's a lot more
reading !
(Plus of course
Lets talk about SIP and IAX2
1. The good and bad of both
2. What is the better one and why
3. and any other information that maybe use full
--
Best regards,
Al Bochter
Bochter Services
(Voip PBX) Toll Free: 866-638-1254 EXT: 250
(Voip PBX) Free World DialUp: 780217 EXT: 250
(Voip) Cellular:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 06:51 -0400, Al Bochter wrote:
Lets talk about SIP and IAX2
1. The good and bad of both
2. What is the better one and why
3. and any other information that maybe use full
like this?
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-IAX+versus+SIP
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:51:39AM -0400, Al Bochter wrote:
Lets talk about SIP and IAX2
1. The good and bad of both
2. What is the better one and why
3. and any other information that maybe use full
Let's be more specific. For connecting phones? For interconnecting PBXs?
Have you did some
iax using one port, that is good if going through firewalls and is
efektive when trunking multiple calls,
but not using tcp, so it is not so great (tunneling through ssh is not
possible)
iax using own jitterbuffer, that isn't interoperate with generic
jitterbuffer used in SIP
iax-iax
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:23 +0200, Pavel Jezek wrote:
with iax I have still problems with messages like:
[Oct 26 12:58:30] NOTICE[11417]: chan_iax2.c:7075 socket_process: Peer
'wilder' is now TOO LAGGED (2014 ms)!
[Oct 26 12:59:37] NOTICE[11415]: chan_iax2.c:7075 socket_process: Peer
with SIP qualify, I can specify, what time in delay I will accept,
with sip and setting qualify=3000 I can circumvent this anoying messages
(bacause delay in reply is about 2000ms, and I accept 3000ms)
with iax, qualify is working different, so setting qualify=3000 will
ping peer every 3s,
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:43 +0200, Pavel Jezek wrote:
with SIP qualify, I can specify, what time in delay I will accept,
with sip and setting qualify=3000 I can circumvent this anoying messages
(bacause delay in reply is about 2000ms, and I accept 3000ms)
with iax, qualify is working
-Original Message-
From: Dave Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP v IAX2
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:43 +0200, Pavel Jezek wrote:
with SIP qualify
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP v IAX2
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:43 +0200, Pavel Jezek wrote:
with SIP qualify, I can specify, what time in delay I will accept,
with sip and setting qualify=3000 I can circumvent this
anoying messages
(bacause delay
-5355
Toronto Ontario
Canada
-Original Message-
From: Dave Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP v IAX2
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:43 +0200
On Thursday 26 October 2006 13:14, Henry.L.Coleman wrote:
As I understand it the main advantege IAX has over SIP is the number of
port it uses and therefore its ability to traverse router/switches and
firewalls
Yes.
Also the higher number of simulatanious SIP calls travelling through these
: Dave Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP v IAX2
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:43 +0200, Pavel Jezek wrote:
with SIP qualify, I can specify, what time
26 okt 2006 kl. 18.57 skrev Douglas Garstang:
-Original Message-
From: Dave Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP v IAX2
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:43
-Original Message-
From: Olle E Johansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:53 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP v IAX2
26 okt 2006 kl. 18.57 skrev Douglas Garstang:
-Original
26 matches
Mail list logo
