On 14/06/10 18:11, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Chris Bagnall wrote:
>
>> Actually, the Atom seems to be surprisingly powerful. We have a couple of
>> Atom boxes with transcoding and conferences enabled without issue. I
>> wouldn't pretend it'll cope with hundreds of conference pa
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Kyle Kienapfel wrote:
> For embedded systems, I plan to try running asterisk off of an old AMD
> Geode based thin client, It's got debian but I've replaced /sbin/init
> with a link to busybox and I have a script that does the bare minimum
> to get operational and have syslog lo
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Kyle Kienapfel wrote:
> http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/business/skype-manager/
> "Currently, we're expecting a suggested charge of between €2 to €10
> per seat/month."
>
> Whoops, *grabs a napkin*
And that is in addition to the per channel charge of SfS !
/r
--
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Kyle Kienapfel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Randy R wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere
>>> wrote:
>
> pretty much giving up on Skype for Asterisk (and Skype for SI
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Randy R wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere
>> wrote:
pretty much giving up on Skype for Asterisk (and Skype for SIP) now
that I realize that they'll be charging a monthly fe
t; From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
> >> [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Hans Witvliet
> >> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 4:21 PM
> >> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> >> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Small PC to build and run Aste
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Randy R wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
pretty much giving up on Skype for Asterisk (and Skype for SIP) now
that I realize that they'll be charging a monthly fee that is
disproportionately high compared to my need to let Skype users call
us
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>> pretty much giving up on Skype for Asterisk (and Skype for SIP) now
>> that I realize that they'll be charging a monthly fee that is
>> disproportionately high compared to my need to let Skype users call
>> us. We'll know the pricing in Q
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Randy R wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Michael Graves wrote:
>> Some distro's, like Askozia and Astlinux, have been specifically
>> engineered around running from flash media. This basic form of
>> operation has been well proven in projects like monowall and pfsen
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Michael Graves wrote:
> Some distro's, like Askozia and Astlinux, have been specifically
> engineered around running from flash media. This basic form of
> operation has been well proven in projects like monowall and pfsense.
I think you hit the essence of the arg
n Behalf Of Hans Witvliet
>> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 4:21 PM
>> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Small PC to build and run Asterisk
>>
>> Why no flash?
>>
>>
>>> * Small pre-built PC (not buying board,
t; To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Small PC to build and run Asterisk
>
> Why no flash?
>
>
>> * Small pre-built PC (not buying board, case, all parts separately)
>> * Low power consumption
>> * No fan or very small fan
>
-users] Small PC to build and run Asterisk
Why no flash?
> * Small pre-built PC (not buying board, case, all parts separately)
> * Low power consumption
> * No fan or very small fan
> * Hard drive (not flash memory)
An ssd uses less power, so generates less warmth, hen
Why no flash?
> * Small pre-built PC (not buying board, case, all parts separately)
> * Low power consumption
> * No fan or very small fan
> * Hard drive (not flash memory)
An ssd uses less power, so generates less warmth, hence less need for
fan in the drive area. Also less noise
Randy R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to build an Asterisk box that can run at a remote
> location. Here are most of the specs of what I'm looking for:
>
> Physical hardware
>
> * Small pre-built PC (not buying board, case, all parts separately)
> * Low power consumption
> * No fan or ve
Thanks everyone for your suggestions.
Is it feasable to run Skype for Asterisk on the Atom processors? It's
a feature I'd really like to have. As for conferencing, we rarely use
it but never would need more than 3 seats.
--
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Chris Bagnall wrote:
> Actually, the Atom seems to be surprisingly powerful. We have a couple of
> Atom boxes with transcoding and conferences enabled without issue. I
> wouldn't pretend it'll cope with hundreds of conference participants, but
> with ~10 or so it seems to be f
Actually, the Atom seems to be surprisingly powerful. We have a couple of
Atom boxes with transcoding and conferences enabled without issue. I
wouldn't pretend it'll cope with hundreds of conference participants, but
with ~10 or so it seems to be fine.
Likewise with transcoding - we've only rea
How limited are you in the no-no category when using a small machine
like this. Do you set you system to prevent transcoding? Does it
prevent conferencing? Just curious. I kind of like those features but
love the idea of the small machines.
On 06/14/2010 07:37 AM, Chris Bagnall wrote:
I'm
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Chris Bagnall
wrote:
> We've used the Asus eeeBox (desktop version of their little netbooks) quite
> successfully in past projects: Atom 1.6, 1GB RAM, 160GB HDD.
Wow, we used to benefit from the space program that handed down
technologies madre cheaper, now it's t
> I'm looking to build an Asterisk box that can run at a remote
> location.
We've used the Asus eeeBox (desktop version of their little netbooks) quite
successfully in past projects: Atom 1.6, 1GB RAM, 160GB HDD.
Generally we run Gentoo Linux with Asterisk 1.4., but no reason why
you couldn't r
> * Skype for Asterisk needs to run on this <- so this means x86, right?
or x86_64 is fine
--
Thanks, Phil
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introduc
AsteriskNow is better
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Randy R wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to build an Asterisk box that can run at a remote
> location. Here are most of the specs of what I'm looking for:
>
> Physical hardware
>
>* Small pre-built PC (not buying board, case, all parts separ
Hi,
I'm looking to build an Asterisk box that can run at a remote
location. Here are most of the specs of what I'm looking for:
Physical hardware
* Small pre-built PC (not buying board, case, all parts separately)
* Low power consumption
* No fan or very small fan
* Hard drive (n
24 matches
Mail list logo