Re: [asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Alex Balashov
Thorolf Godawa wrote: > Unfortunately I think (and this is also my experience), a virtualized > Asterisk server will not work on higher load and might loose > UDP-VoIP-pakets what will result in a bad voice quality! Much has been said of this topic. In general, you are correct; the effects of

Re: [asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Thorolf Godawa
Hi Scott, > Apologize for not directly answering your questions, however, I'm > considering playing with Remus and Xen in the future to deal with > high availability without dropping calls. thanks a lot for the link, it looks quite interesting. Unfortunately I think (and this is also my experienc

Re: [asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Thorolf Godawa
Hi Alex, > In the [general] section of sip.conf, set the 'bindaddr' parameter to > the cluster IP. If Asterisk is only bound to the floating interface, yeah, that's it :-) I have not tested failover right now, but registring of the phones now works! Thanks a lot, -- Chau y hasta luego, Thoro

Re: [asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Alex Balashov
Fred Posner wrote: > If you're using just SIP to SIP, a better option would be a pure sip proxy, > ala Kamailio/SER, etc. They can survive a failover without a drop. Agreed. Even if using transaction-stateful relay mode, as long as a dialog is nailed up, sequential in-dialog messages (re-INVI

Re: [asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Fred Posner
On Dec 3, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Matt Riddell wrote: > On 4/12/09 9:28 AM, Scott L. Lykens wrote: >> Apologize for not directly answering your questions, however, I'm >> considering playing with Remus and Xen in the future to deal with high >> availability without dropping calls. >> >> See http://dsg.

Re: [asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Matt Riddell
On 4/12/09 9:28 AM, Scott L. Lykens wrote: > Apologize for not directly answering your questions, however, I'm > considering playing with Remus and Xen in the future to deal with high > availability without dropping calls. > > See http://dsg.cs.ubc.ca/remus/ for some details. > > I have no idea if

Re: [asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Alex Balashov
Thorolf, In the [general] section of sip.conf, set the 'bindaddr' parameter to the cluster IP. If Asterisk is only bound to the floating interface, it will respond only from that source IP. -- Alex Thorolf Godawa wrote: > Hi all, > > I installed a Linux-HA-cluster with DRBD and Asterisk 1.4

Re: [asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Scott L. Lykens
risk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong > Actually it might work quite good, failover etc. works, even if this is not a 0- > downtime solution, because current calls are dropped and the phones not > are reachable until they reregister at the Asterisk. Apologize for

[asterisk-users] Source-IP on Asterisk DRBD/-HA-Cluster wrong

2009-12-03 Thread Thorolf Godawa
Hi all, I installed a Linux-HA-cluster with DRBD and Asterisk 1.4 on it. Actually it might work quite good, failover etc. works, even if this is not a 0-downtime solution, because current calls are dropped and the phones not are reachable until they reregister at the Asterisk. It "might" work go