Re: [asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-14 Thread Anton Tinchev
How about meassuring it directly? For starters, take a look at zttest.c . (Though it could use some slightly better accuracy). Not sure how accurate is zttest.c. Will run some test to see it's accuracy. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haha cool, I'm the Belgian guy in Sofia you've met before, i asked for exactly the same reason as you :) Zoa. Anton Tinchev wrote: Zoa wrote: Can you tell us how you do the testing ? 3-4 different ways. All gives same results, so test are pretty valid. 1. Interrupt counting inside the

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-14 Thread Anton Tinchev
Which card, BTW? TDM400 analog ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-10 Thread Anton Tinchev
Anybody sucessfully got stable 1000Hz clock without Digium harware and kernel 2.6? We need to consult some peoples how to clock asterisk stable with exactly 1000 Hz without much kernel/drives patching/tweaking. Some test results we made so far: 2.6 with digium card - stable 1000 Hz. 2.6 with

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-10 Thread Zoa
Can you tell us how you do the testing ? Zoa. Anton Tinchev wrote: Anybody sucessfully got stable 1000Hz clock without Digium harware and kernel 2.6? We need to consult some peoples how to clock asterisk stable with exactly 1000 Hz without much kernel/drives patching/tweaking. Some test

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-10 Thread Anton Tinchev
Zoa wrote: Can you tell us how you do the testing ? 3-4 different ways. All gives same results, so test are pretty valid. 1. Interrupt counting inside the PC. 2. TDMoE packet counting on the switch. 3. External TDMoE equipment connected thru extreme network swich. The card of the PC and the

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:28:09PM +0200, Anton Tinchev wrote: Zoa wrote: Can you tell us how you do the testing ? 3-4 different ways. All gives same results, so test are pretty valid. 1. Interrupt counting inside the PC. 2. TDMoE packet counting on the switch. 3. External TDMoE

Re: [asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-10 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Anton Tinchev wrote: Anybody sucessfully got stable 1000Hz clock without Digium harware and kernel 2.6? We need to consult some peoples how to clock asterisk stable with exactly 1000 Hz without much kernel/drives patching/tweaking. Some test

RE: [asterisk-users] Stable clock with 2.6 and without Digium hardware.

2006-11-10 Thread Dan Austin
snip Anton wrote: 2.6 with kernel clock - needs kernel recompiling and work stable with switched off kernel Preemption. Long time tests in progress now. How are you doing this? I saw a couple developers talk about rewriting ztdummy yo use the new hi-res kernel timers (kernel2.6.17), but did