OCG Technical Support schrieb:
We use extensions like plant201 and tunnel12 so it does work in 1.4
As a *pattern* (e.g. _plant2XX, _tunnel.)?
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jose P.
No, sorry, we match _XXX to jump to plant123
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Philipp
Kempgen
Sent: February 13, 2009 4:35 PM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Strange
: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue
On extensions.conf.sample I see this:
; Extension names may be numbers, letters, or combinations
; thereof. If an extension name is prefixed by a '_'
; character, it is interpreted as a pattern rather than a
; literal. In patterns, some characters have
Greetings list,
Wondering if anyone has come across this strange dialplan pattern matching
issue before:
I have a context defined as follows (the plus simply implies it follows on from
an existing context in another #include - which, yes, has been included first):
[privatedundi](+)
exten =
On extensions.conf.sample I see this:
; Extension names may be numbers, letters, or combinations
; thereof. If an extension name is prefixed by a '_'
; character, it is interpreted as a pattern rather than a
; literal. In patterns, some characters have special meanings:
;
; X - any digit from
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue
Greetings list,
Wondering if anyone has come across this strange dialplan pattern matching
issue before:
I have a context defined as follows (the plus simply implies it follows on from
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue
Greetings list,
Wondering if anyone has come across this strange dialplan pattern matching
issue before:
I have a context defined as follows (the plus simply implies it follows
Hi,
As others have mentioned, the 'n' is a pattern char.
I have a system that uses similar tricks to yours. What I did about
this issue was to change the pattern match chars to be upper case
only. Drop me a line if you want the patch.
Regards,
Steve
On 2/12/09, Chris Bagnall