Re: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue

2009-02-13 Thread Philipp Kempgen
OCG Technical Support schrieb: We use extensions like plant201 and tunnel12 so it does work in 1.4 As a *pattern* (e.g. _plant2XX, _tunnel.)? -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jose P.

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue

2009-02-13 Thread OCG Technical Support
No, sorry, we match _XXX to jump to plant123 -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Philipp Kempgen Sent: February 13, 2009 4:35 PM To: Asterisk Users List Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Strange

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue

2009-02-12 Thread OCG Technical Support
: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue On extensions.conf.sample I see this: ; Extension names may be numbers, letters, or combinations ; thereof. If an extension name is prefixed by a '_' ; character, it is interpreted as a pattern rather than a ; literal. In patterns, some characters have

[asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue

2009-02-11 Thread Chris Bagnall
Greetings list, Wondering if anyone has come across this strange dialplan pattern matching issue before: I have a context defined as follows (the plus simply implies it follows on from an existing context in another #include - which, yes, has been included first): [privatedundi](+) exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue

2009-02-11 Thread Jose P. Espinal
On extensions.conf.sample I see this: ; Extension names may be numbers, letters, or combinations ; thereof. If an extension name is prefixed by a '_' ; character, it is interpreted as a pattern rather than a ; literal. In patterns, some characters have special meanings: ; ; X - any digit from

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue

2009-02-11 Thread Nabeel Jafferali
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue Greetings list, Wondering if anyone has come across this strange dialplan pattern matching issue before: I have a context defined as follows (the plus simply implies it follows on from

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue

2009-02-11 Thread Nabeel Jafferali
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue Greetings list, Wondering if anyone has come across this strange dialplan pattern matching issue before: I have a context defined as follows (the plus simply implies it follows

Re: [asterisk-users] Strange dialplan matching issue

2009-02-11 Thread Stephen Davies
Hi, As others have mentioned, the 'n' is a pattern char. I have a system that uses similar tricks to yours. What I did about this issue was to change the pattern match chars to be upper case only. Drop me a line if you want the patch. Regards, Steve On 2/12/09, Chris Bagnall