Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Faxing and Asterisk

2007-10-31 Thread Paul Bryson
Nasir Iqbal wrote: Hi, Have you tried Callweaver http://www.callweaver.org I was really hoping to be able to use Trixbox to do this and it's a pretty complete solution by itself. Unfortunately that requires Asterisk. It appears that there is no way to get Asterisk, or anything on the

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Faxing and Asterisk

2007-10-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought there was some talk of getting T38Gateway into asterisk_addons? Stupid linking bullshits. On 10/31/07, Paul Bryson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nasir Iqbal wrote: Hi, Have you tried Callweaver http://www.callweaver.org I was really hoping to be able to use Trixbox to do this and

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Faxing and Asterisk

2007-10-31 Thread Paul Bryson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought there was some talk of getting T38Gateway into asterisk_addons? Stupid linking bullshits. Stupid indeed. I'm surprised T.38 support isn't a higher priority for Digium, given that faxing has such a high failure rate with VoIP. Paul

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Faxing and Asterisk

2007-10-27 Thread Vivek Shrivastava
Hi, Yes, i have used it for T.38 faxing. Thanks, Vivek On 10/26/07, Nasir Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Have you tried Callweaver http://www.callweaver.org ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 Faxing and Asterisk

2007-10-26 Thread Nasir Iqbal
Hi, Have you tried Callweaver http://www.callweaver.org ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

[asterisk-users] T.38 Faxing and Asterisk

2007-10-25 Thread Paul Bryson
I understand that Asterisk 1.4 should support T.38 pass-through, but I need Asterisk (or something on the Asterisk box) to act as a T.38 endpoint. Judging from the unclaimed $12,000USD bounty, it doesn't appear that Asterisk itself can do this.