Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-29 Thread Faisal Hanif
Hi,

I haven't write any How to on it but below are some step by step
instructions to run Asterisk on windows,

1-Install Cygwin.
2-Install build essentials in Cygwin.
3-Download Asterisk source (I used 1.4.x) and unzip it using tar (You may
need to install tar manually as it is missing in some Cygwin default
installations. Don't use windows unzip for as it will create some abnormal
character in source and will make unexpected compile time errors)
4-Run bootstrap it will report any missing or lower version libs,
prerequisite or tools.
5-You may need to manually install/upgrade tools like autoconf, automake etc
depending on your Cygwin installation.
6-You manually need to download and compile termcap, ncurses.
7-Run configure.
8-Make menuselect and disable all non-required modules as it will save to
resolve lot of not needed dependencies.
9-Run make
10-Resolve any missing reported by make.
11-After successful make run make install
12-Once make install okey you can run asterisk on Cygwin console and also
directly run by double clicking on asterisk.exe in c:/Cygwin/usr/sbin/.

Once you have compiled it you can copy asterisk.exe to any other system not
having Cygwin installed by you have to care about following,

1-You must have to create required directories structure like Cygwin on
system drive.
2-You must need to copy required Cygwin DLLs to new systems
\windows\system32\ folder. You can identify required DLLs by trying to run
asterisk.exe and it will report missing DLLs one by one.

I did just for my experiment and fun and was able to make successful SIP
calls using static files configuration.

However I suggest to use SIPx, Yate or FreeSWITCH if you want to stick with
windows as that have native windows ports and have all required features you
need in a PABX or VoIP switch.

Regards,

Faisal Hanif


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-29 Thread Faisal Hanif
Hi,

One more thing previously there was a project named as AstWin which was
maintaining asterisk's port to windows and providing an installable package
of Asterisk for windows. I am not aware about current state of project  but,

 I have installation package of Asterisk for windows version 1.2.

If anyone need it contact me direct at email imfa...@gmail.com I will send
the software as attachment.

Regards,

Faisal Hanif


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-29 Thread A J Stiles
On Thursday 28 Jul 2011, Gilles wrote:
 On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:04:38 +0500, Faisal Hanif fai...@vopium.com
 wrote:
 I have tried asterisk on windows XP using Cygwin and it worked fine.
 Would you mind explaining how to do this?

I hate to sound patronising but, if you need to ask how to install Cygwin on 
Windows, you really shouldn't bother.  You *will* find it quicker, cheaper, 
easier and less frustrating in the long run just to get a scrap PC and 
install Linux on that.  Especially now there are dedicated distros which 
install Linux and Asterisk ready to go.

What you are wanting to do is, in essence, like teaching a gerbil to bark.  
It's an extraordinary effort to go to when you can get puppies anywhere; and 
at the end of the day, it's still not, and never will be, a proper dog.

-- 
AJS

Answers come *after* questions.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-29 Thread Tim Nelson
- Original Message -
 What you are wanting to do is, in essence, like teaching a gerbil to
 bark.
 It's an extraordinary effort to go to when you can get puppies
 anywhere; and
 at the end of the day, it's still not, and never will be, a proper
 dog.
 

+1 I could not have said it better myself.

--tim

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-28 Thread Faisal Hanif
I have tried asterisk on windows XP using Cygwin and it worked fine.

 

From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com 
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Antonio Modesto
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 1:45 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

 

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 09:45 +0200, Gilles wrote: 

 
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:28:27 +, Soeren Malchow (MCon)
soeren.malc...@mcon.net wrote:
And asterisk just runs fine on linux why bother ?
 
Because I, for one, would like to run Asterisk on my Windows
workstation at home as an enhanced answering machine :-)



Windows never was a good solution for these things, and i think it will never 
be.




 
 
 
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

 

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-28 Thread Paul Belanger

On 11-07-26 03:21 AM, Gilles wrote:

Are there just not enough interest and too many, deep, Linux-specific
assumptions in the code, that would explain why Asterisk was never
officially ported to Windows?


Cost?

For me to run Asterisk under Windows requires me to purchase a Microsoft 
license for the OS, with Linux it is not required.


--
Paul Belanger
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
twitter: pabelanger | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode)
Check us out at: http://digium.com  http://asterisk.org

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-28 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:04:38 +0500, Faisal Hanif fai...@vopium.com
wrote:
I have tried asterisk on windows XP using Cygwin and it worked fine.

Would you mind explaining how to do this?

Thank you.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-28 Thread Danny Nicholas
Interrupting - you have to not use DAHDI (SIP Only) and make sure you have
the necessary libs downloaded in your Cygwin install.

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gilles
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:42 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:04:38 +0500, Faisal Hanif fai...@vopium.com
wrote:
I have tried asterisk on windows XP using Cygwin and it worked fine.

Would you mind explaining how to do this?

Thank you.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-28 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:46:03 -0500, Danny Nicholas
da...@debsinc.com wrote:
Interrupting - you have to not use DAHDI (SIP Only) and make sure you have
the necessary libs downloaded in your Cygwin install.

It's OK, I don't mind using a VoIP gateway instead of a PCI card. Has
someone written an HOWTO to compile 1.4 or 1.6 for Windows?

Does it require patching to Asterisk and/or libraries, or does Cygwin
handles the whole thing?


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-28 Thread Danny Nicholas
If they have, it would probably be on www.nerdvittles.com 


-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gilles
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 1:02 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:46:03 -0500, Danny Nicholas
da...@debsinc.com wrote:
Interrupting - you have to not use DAHDI (SIP Only) and make sure you 
have the necessary libs downloaded in your Cygwin install.

It's OK, I don't mind using a VoIP gateway instead of a PCI card. Has
someone written an HOWTO to compile 1.4 or 1.6 for Windows?

Does it require patching to Asterisk and/or libraries, or does Cygwin
handles the whole thing?


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-28 Thread Tim Nelson
- Original Message -
 On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:46:03 -0500, Danny Nicholas
 da...@debsinc.com wrote:
 Interrupting - you have to not use DAHDI (SIP Only) and make sure you
 have
 the necessary libs downloaded in your Cygwin install.
 
 It's OK, I don't mind using a VoIP gateway instead of a PCI card. Has
 someone written an HOWTO to compile 1.4 or 1.6 for Windows?
 
 Does it require patching to Asterisk and/or libraries, or does Cygwin
 handles the whole thing?

Here's a question I must ask...

Why do people want to run Asterisk on Windows? Typically, the person knows the 
Windows environment better. However, that doesn't mean that simply by running 
on Windows Asterisk will be easier to manage. It is still run via console, 
editing text files, etc. In reality, it seems more work and headache to run 
this on a non-supported platform when you're really not gaining anything. AND, 
this doesn't even include the whole Linux vs. Windows argument.

Yes, yes I understand the whole 'its open source I want to do whatever I want 
with it' argument. Fine. But why take that attitude about Asterisk, only to 
amputate it by running on a non-open-source platform?

Kids these days... :)

--Tim

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-28 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:08:33 -0500, Danny Nicholas
da...@debsinc.com wrote:
If they have, it would probably be on www.nerdvittles.com 

It looks like The Incredible PBX runs on CentOS

www.nerdvittles.com/index.php?p=740


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-27 Thread Antonio Modesto
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 09:45 +0200, Gilles wrote:

 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:28:27 +, Soeren Malchow (MCon)
 soeren.malc...@mcon.net wrote:
 And asterisk just runs fine on linux why bother ?
 
 Because I, for one, would like to run Asterisk on my Windows
 workstation at home as an enhanced answering machine :-)



Windows never was a good solution for these things, and i think it will
never be.


 
 
 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Gilles
Hello,

Since Asterisk has been ported to exotic platforms like SOHO routers
(Linksys, Buffalo, etc.) and non-MMU CPUs (Blackfin, etc.), I was
wondering why the Windows port never really took off.

As far as I can tell, www.asteriskwin32.com is a one-man effort
(Patrick Deruel's) that is not going anywhere (latest version based on
1.2.26.2).

Are there just not enough interest and too many, deep, Linux-specific
assumptions in the code, that would explain why Asterisk was never
officially ported to Windows?

Thank you.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Soeren Malchow (MCon)
Hi Gilles,

For me the main question would be first, why would you want to port asterisk to 
Windows where you would need to pay license fees ?

And asterisk just runs fine on linux why bother ?

Cheers
Soeren


-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com 
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gilles
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 12:52 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

Hello,

Since Asterisk has been ported to exotic platforms like SOHO routers (Linksys, 
Buffalo, etc.) and non-MMU CPUs (Blackfin, etc.), I was wondering why the 
Windows port never really took off.

As far as I can tell, www.asteriskwin32.com is a one-man effort (Patrick 
Deruel's) that is not going anywhere (latest version based on 1.2.26.2).

Are there just not enough interest and too many, deep, Linux-specific 
assumptions in the code, that would explain why Asterisk was never officially 
ported to Windows?

Thank you.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to 
Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:28:27 +, Soeren Malchow (MCon)
soeren.malc...@mcon.net wrote:
And asterisk just runs fine on linux why bother ?

Because I, for one, would like to run Asterisk on my Windows
workstation at home as an enhanced answering machine :-)


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread A J Stiles
On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011, Gilles wrote:
 Hello,

 Since Asterisk has been ported to exotic platforms like SOHO routers
 (Linksys, Buffalo, etc.) and non-MMU CPUs (Blackfin, etc.), I was
 wondering why the Windows port never really took off.

A better question would be:  Why would anyone even *want* to port Asterisk to 
Windows?  You have to pay for Windows *and* you don't even get the Source 
Code.  And you can't run Windows without the CPU-hogging GUI.  Worst of all 
possible worlds, surely?

If you want to run Asterisk on a Windows PC, it is far easier just to boot up 
an AsteriskNOW CD.

-- 
AJS

Answers come *after* questions.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:45:35AM +0200, Gilles wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:28:27 +, Soeren Malchow (MCon)
 soeren.malc...@mcon.net wrote:
 And asterisk just runs fine on linux why bother ?
 
 Because I, for one, would like to run Asterisk on my Windows
 workstation at home as an enhanced answering machine :-)

Patches are welcomed.

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread A J Stiles
On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011, Gilles wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:28:27 +, Soeren Malchow (MCon)

 soeren.malc...@mcon.net wrote:
 And asterisk just runs fine on linux why bother ?

 Because I, for one, would like to run Asterisk on my Windows
 workstation at home as an enhanced answering machine :-)

And you can't just run Asterisk on a separate Linux box at home as an enhanced 
answering machine because . ?

-- 
AJS

Answers come *after* questions.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:59:22 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen
tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
Patches are welcomed.

Does someone know the kind of changes that were made by AsteriskWin32,
and how hard it'd be to apply them to more recent releases of
Asterisk?


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:45:59AM +0200, Gilles wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:59:22 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen
 tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
 Patches are welcomed.
 
 Does someone know the kind of changes that were made by AsteriskWin32,
 and how hard it'd be to apply them to more recent releases of
 Asterisk?

There were some later fixes at around 1.6.0 to try to get the code built
on cygwin. I would suggest you to try building it on cygwin and see
where things fail.

Also grep for CYGWIN or such in the source (especially in Makefile-s).

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:07:10 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen
tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com wrote:
There were some later fixes at around 1.6.0 to try to get the code built
on cygwin. I would suggest you to try building it on cygwin and see
where things fail.

Also grep for CYGWIN or such in the source (especially in Makefile-s).

Thanks for the infos.


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Ruben Rögels
...and why do we all mess around with IT stuff and asterisk in special?

Spoiler: because we can...!

;-)

regards,
Ruben

Am 26.07.2011 10:16, schrieb A J Stiles:
 On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011, Gilles wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:28:27 +, Soeren Malchow (MCon)

 soeren.malc...@mcon.net wrote:
 And asterisk just runs fine on linux why bother ?

 Because I, for one, would like to run Asterisk on my Windows
 workstation at home as an enhanced answering machine :-)
 
 And you can't just run Asterisk on a separate Linux box at home as an 
 enhanced 
 answering machine because . ?
 


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Why no traction for Windows version?

2011-07-26 Thread Alex Balashov
I think the real answer has mostly to do with the fact that no serious person, 
in their right mind, would run Windows in a server role in 2011.  Not unless 
their hands are tied by legacy systems or big-corporate IT logic.  

Asterisk is firmly intended to run on servers.  It's not a desktop app.

--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

On Jul 26, 2011, at 3:45 AM, Gilles codecompl...@free.fr wrote:

 On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:28:27 +, Soeren Malchow (MCon)
 soeren.malc...@mcon.net wrote:
 And asterisk just runs fine on linux why bother ?
 
 Because I, for one, would like to run Asterisk on my Windows
 workstation at home as an enhanced answering machine :-)
 
 
 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users