I do not use ConfBridge() in a large installation. I use MeetMe on
1.6.0.*
The timing is different for ConfBridge, as it does not require DAHDI.
If you have that good of an experience with 1.4, why change anything?
I like new things. ConfBridge eliminates the need for an external timing
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Robert McGilvray rmcgi...@globeop.com wrote:
Does anyone use confbridge in a large installation and can provide feedback
on its stability, quality in comparison to MeetMe? I use a sangoma card in
my 1.4.2 box to provide timing and it has never been an issue. Can
I have an existing conference bridge running on Asterisk 1.4.2 using
MeetMe and it's been pretty much rock solid since it was installed. We
do around 460,000 minutes on it monthly and peak at about 150
simultaneous sip channels. I'm adding a second bridge for redundancy
purposes into another
