[asterisk-users] ring splash

2010-05-26 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere

Something new to me.  Recently installed a 1.4.30 box for a small office 
with four POTS lines in a hunt (Digium TDM410P).  Had the telco put a 
call forward option on the main line of the hunt.  They dial a feature 
code from their desk phones (Polycom IP450) that results in forwarding the 
main number to our VoIP service.  This is all to let them try out our 
dialtone service before porting the number to us and ditching the POTS 
lines.

So we perform some test calls and they all go through fine, and everyone 
is happy, BUT everytime a call comes through it ALSO causes the POTS line 
to ring, and a ghost call rings all the phones in the office (the 
desired result of an inbound call from POTS).  When they answer it they 
get fast busy because it isn't actually a real call.

I spoke to the telco this morning about it and they said oh yeah - that 
is a ring splash that lets the customer know that a call was forwarded. 
They said this was a feature of their DMS-100, it has worked that way for 
twenty years, and they can't turn it off.

So to the question - can the TDM410P somehow tell the difference between a 
ring splash and an actual inbound call?  I think in the meantime I will 
send inbound POTS calls to an auto attendant that will eventually hang up, 
but would love a more elegant solution ;)

Cheers,

j

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ring splash

2010-05-26 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 05/26/2010 11:36 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:

 So to the question - can the TDM410P somehow tell the difference between a 
 ring splash and an actual inbound call?  I think in the meantime I will 
 send inbound POTS calls to an auto attendant that will eventually hang up, 
 but would love a more elegant solution ;)

The simple answer is no; the ling rings, the ringing is detected and
forwarded up the software stack.

The more complex answer is that first, the TDM410P doesn't actually know
anything about detecting ringing, ring patterns, or anything of the
like, it's essentially dumb hardware :-) The driver for the hardware
detects the incoming ring voltage and debounces it before reporting it
to the DAHDI core and then upstream to Asterisk; it is possible you
could set the debounce timer to require that the ring last at least
500ms (or maybe even a full second) before reporting it, which would
absorb these ring splashes.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
skype: kpfleming | jabber: kflem...@digium.com
Check us out at www.digium.com  www.asterisk.org

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ring splash

2010-05-26 Thread Cary Fitch
The ring splash is a long standing feature of call forwarding.

Of course somewhere in the Asterisk code a change could be made to extend
the time required to detect a valid ring.

But, how about just unplugging the pots lines from the PBX with a quick
restore ability?  Unplug lines at the NID, or open bridging clips or
whatever applies.

Cary Fitch



-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
LaCoursiere
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 11:36 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] ring splash


Something new to me.  Recently installed a 1.4.30 box for a small office 
with four POTS lines in a hunt (Digium TDM410P).  Had the telco put a 
call forward option on the main line of the hunt.  They dial a feature 
code from their desk phones (Polycom IP450) that results in forwarding the 
main number to our VoIP service.  This is all to let them try out our 
dialtone service before porting the number to us and ditching the POTS 
lines.

So we perform some test calls and they all go through fine, and everyone 
is happy, BUT everytime a call comes through it ALSO causes the POTS line 
to ring, and a ghost call rings all the phones in the office (the 
desired result of an inbound call from POTS).  When they answer it they 
get fast busy because it isn't actually a real call.

I spoke to the telco this morning about it and they said oh yeah - that 
is a ring splash that lets the customer know that a call was forwarded. 
They said this was a feature of their DMS-100, it has worked that way for 
twenty years, and they can't turn it off.

So to the question - can the TDM410P somehow tell the difference between a 
ring splash and an actual inbound call?  I think in the meantime I will 
send inbound POTS calls to an auto attendant that will eventually hang up, 
but would love a more elegant solution ;)

Cheers,

j

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ring splash

2010-05-26 Thread Brent Davidson
Just set the POTS lines to answer after a second ring rather than after 
the first.  Problem solved.

On 5/26/2010 11:36 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
 Something new to me.  Recently installed a 1.4.30 box for a small office
 with four POTS lines in a hunt (Digium TDM410P).  Had the telco put a
 call forward option on the main line of the hunt.  They dial a feature
 code from their desk phones (Polycom IP450) that results in forwarding the
 main number to our VoIP service.  This is all to let them try out our
 dialtone service before porting the number to us and ditching the POTS
 lines.

 So we perform some test calls and they all go through fine, and everyone
 is happy, BUT everytime a call comes through it ALSO causes the POTS line
 to ring, and a ghost call rings all the phones in the office (the
 desired result of an inbound call from POTS).  When they answer it they
 get fast busy because it isn't actually a real call.

 I spoke to the telco this morning about it and they said oh yeah - that
 is a ring splash that lets the customer know that a call was forwarded.
 They said this was a feature of their DMS-100, it has worked that way for
 twenty years, and they can't turn it off.

 So to the question - can the TDM410P somehow tell the difference between a
 ring splash and an actual inbound call?  I think in the meantime I will
 send inbound POTS calls to an auto attendant that will eventually hang up,
 but would love a more elegant solution ;)

 Cheers,

 j




-- 
Brent Davidson
Texas Country Title Company
112 W 2nd / P.O. Box 663
Cameron, TX 76520
254-605-0140 ex. 21
br...@texascountrytitle.com


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ring splash

2010-05-26 Thread Trevor Benson
Strangely enough I have used this many times with our POTS from ATT.  We get 
ring splash, but didnt get a ghost ring into the system, just the valid ring 
that was redirected to the VoIP lines after forwarding.  Although I think i had 
the Asterisk-GUI creating the dialplan on these systems, not sure if it changes 
anything besides the dialplan though that would cause it to seem normal 
during a forward of a POTS line.


--
Trevor Benson
dCAP, LPIC-1, CLA, Network+, MCP, CNA
A1 Networks - Network Engineer
DID (707)703-1041
FAX (707)703-1983






On May 26, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Cary Fitch wrote:

 The ring splash is a long standing feature of call forwarding.
 
 Of course somewhere in the Asterisk code a change could be made to extend
 the time required to detect a valid ring.
 
 But, how about just unplugging the pots lines from the PBX with a quick
 restore ability?  Unplug lines at the NID, or open bridging clips or
 whatever applies.
 
 Cary Fitch
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
 LaCoursiere
 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 11:36 AM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [asterisk-users] ring splash
 
 
 Something new to me.  Recently installed a 1.4.30 box for a small office 
 with four POTS lines in a hunt (Digium TDM410P).  Had the telco put a 
 call forward option on the main line of the hunt.  They dial a feature 
 code from their desk phones (Polycom IP450) that results in forwarding the 
 main number to our VoIP service.  This is all to let them try out our 
 dialtone service before porting the number to us and ditching the POTS 
 lines.
 
 So we perform some test calls and they all go through fine, and everyone 
 is happy, BUT everytime a call comes through it ALSO causes the POTS line 
 to ring, and a ghost call rings all the phones in the office (the 
 desired result of an inbound call from POTS).  When they answer it they 
 get fast busy because it isn't actually a real call.
 
 I spoke to the telco this morning about it and they said oh yeah - that 
 is a ring splash that lets the customer know that a call was forwarded. 
 They said this was a feature of their DMS-100, it has worked that way for 
 twenty years, and they can't turn it off.
 
 So to the question - can the TDM410P somehow tell the difference between a 
 ring splash and an actual inbound call?  I think in the meantime I will 
 send inbound POTS calls to an auto attendant that will eventually hang up, 
 but would love a more elegant solution ;)
 
 Cheers,
 
 j
 
 -- 
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 -- 
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ring splash

2010-05-26 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere

On Wed, 26 May 2010, Brent Davidson wrote:

 Just set the POTS lines to answer after a second ring rather than after
 the first.  Problem solved.

Now that sounds like a good plan.  But a quick look through the options in 
zapata.conf don't show any kind of option for waiting before pickup. 
Something that *did* look promising is distinctive ring detection.  Has 
anyone used this ability to detect different ring styles?  Presumably with 
a lot of trial and error I might be able to detect a ring splash from a 
real ring.

ALternatively if someone knows how to actually make the card wait X rings 
or seconds before answering, that would be great.  I'm coming up zero on 
searches.  Its already set to wait for callerid, so I am a bit confused 
why it is picking up on a splash... seems it should wait for that second 
ring anyway.

Cheers,

j


 On 5/26/2010 11:36 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
 Something new to me.  Recently installed a 1.4.30 box for a small office
 with four POTS lines in a hunt (Digium TDM410P).  Had the telco put a
 call forward option on the main line of the hunt.  They dial a feature
 code from their desk phones (Polycom IP450) that results in forwarding the
 main number to our VoIP service.  This is all to let them try out our
 dialtone service before porting the number to us and ditching the POTS
 lines.

 So we perform some test calls and they all go through fine, and everyone
 is happy, BUT everytime a call comes through it ALSO causes the POTS line
 to ring, and a ghost call rings all the phones in the office (the
 desired result of an inbound call from POTS).  When they answer it they
 get fast busy because it isn't actually a real call.

 I spoke to the telco this morning about it and they said oh yeah - that
 is a ring splash that lets the customer know that a call was forwarded.
 They said this was a feature of their DMS-100, it has worked that way for
 twenty years, and they can't turn it off.

 So to the question - can the TDM410P somehow tell the difference between a
 ring splash and an actual inbound call?  I think in the meantime I will
 send inbound POTS calls to an auto attendant that will eventually hang up,
 but would love a more elegant solution ;)

 Cheers,

 j




 -- 
 Brent Davidson
 Texas Country Title Company
 112 W 2nd / P.O. Box 663
 Cameron, TX 76520
 254-605-0140 ex. 21
 br...@texascountrytitle.com


 -- 
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ring splash

2010-05-26 Thread Tim Nelson
- Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
 On Wed, 26 May 2010, Brent Davidson wrote:
 
  Just set the POTS lines to answer after a second ring rather than
 after
  the first.  Problem solved.
 
 Now that sounds like a good plan.  But a quick look through the
 options in 
 zapata.conf don't show any kind of option for waiting before pickup. 

It would be in your dialplan. (Untested, OTMH, etc) Dialplan:

[from-analog-lines]
exten = s,1,Wait(2)
exten = s,n,Answer()
exten = s,n,Play(tt-monkeys)
exten = h,1,Hangup()

Again, that is untested, just off the top of my head. The key is putting a 
wait before your Answer(). A phantom ring/ring splash should fade away before 
the Wait() period is finished, therefore not hitting your Answer() or Dial() or 
whatever you have causing all sorts of panic and grief. :-)

--Tim

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] ring splash

2010-05-26 Thread Brent Davidson
On 5/26/2010 1:16 PM, Tim Nelson wrote:
 - Jeff LaCoursierej...@jeff.net  wrote:

 On Wed, 26 May 2010, Brent Davidson wrote:

  
 Just set the POTS lines to answer after a second ring rather than

 after
  
 the first.  Problem solved.

 Now that sounds like a good plan.  But a quick look through the
 options in
 zapata.conf don't show any kind of option for waiting before pickup.
  
 It would be in your dialplan. (Untested, OTMH, etc) Dialplan:

 [from-analog-lines]
 exten =  s,1,Wait(2)
 exten =  s,n,Answer()
 exten =  s,n,Play(tt-monkeys)
 exten =  h,1,Hangup()

 Again, that is untested, just off the top of my head. The key is putting a 
 wait before your Answer(). A phantom ring/ring splash should fade away 
 before the Wait() period is finished, therefore not hitting your Answer() or 
 Dial() or whatever you have causing all sorts of panic and grief. :-)

 --Tim


I was thinking there was a way to directly set the number of rings 
before the system picked up the call, but it looks like Tim is right.  
The Wait statement before the answer appears to be the only way to 
handle this.  I actually used this technique to deal with some phantom 
rings that were occurring at one of my branch offices.  The Telco had 
the switch set up to periodically test the line (like every 30 minutes) 
and Asterisk was detecting those test pulses as a ring and answering the 
call, then passing it on into the operator queue before the system could 
detect the hang-up.  The poor lady at that office nearly had a nervous 
breakdown before I figured out how to filter out the phantom calls with 
the wait command.


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users