All,
has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients? Does
this work properly? What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of
ease of use, battery life etc)?
Thx!!
B.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and
Used the Snom M9 Wifi DECT phones, they work like charm.
SIPDroid on Android phones work good too, however latency is going to be
nightmare for u in softphone n wifi kinda scenario.
Use good quality Access Points like Ruckus Wireless.
Mitul
On May 7, 2012 1:55 PM, Bart Coninckx
Hi,
thx! The Snom M9 does not look like a Wifi phone however, nor is it a
smarthpone. In order to use that I would have to use access points that
can handle both Wifi and DECT. Astraa seems to have (an expensive) one.
SIPDroid crossed my mind. You say they work OK but the latency is
Yeah well Snom M9 is a Wifi DECT Phone (it creates its own 2.4Ghz Frequency
which is understood only between Base Station n M9 Units, It works just
like your standard Chordless phones) difference being that the Base station
is SIP enabled.
SIP Droid is great to work with, it solves most of the
Bart Coninckx bart.conin...@telenet.be writes:
has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients?
Yes...
Does this work properly?
It works nicely for home use for power users who can accept the odd lost
call and know how to restart the app or the phone when something goes
Benny,
very useful, thank you.
So, in short, at this stage it's best to go DECT for wireless and if
DECT and Wifi need to be combined (because both types of devices exist
in the organization), it's preferable to go to access points that offer
both networks.
Correct?
thx,
BC
On 05/07/12
What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800 (
http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection losses?
thx,
BC
On 05/07/12 10:57, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Bart Coninckxbart.conin...@telenet.be writes:
has anyone
Well in that case, you might seriously want to look @ M9 they are cost
effective n definitely work.
Most of these cell phone type looking phones have a serious battery
drainage problem.
Smartphones really have a long way to understand how to preserve battery
and deliver one thing (i.e. calls)
man, 07 05 2012 kl. 12:03 +0200, skrev Bart Coninckx:
What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800
( http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection losses?
I don't know that particular phone, but dedicated wifi
The phone I pointed to is a WiFi phone, the M9 is a DECT phone.
Different animal. The question is regarding using WiFi as the WiFi
infrastructure is already in place.
I understand smartphones is not a good option, but what about these WiFi
SIP phones?
thx!
B.
On 05/07/12 12:21, Mitul
Il 07/05/2012 10.46, Mitul Limbani ha scritto:
Yeah well Snom M9 is a Wifi DECT Phone (it creates its own 2.4Ghz
Frequency which is understood only between Base Station n M9 Units
Certainly nothing to do with wifi, neither the frequency/phisical layer
nor the protocols involved matches.
-
On 5/7/2012 4:24 AM, Bart Coninckx wrote:
has anyone any experience in using Wifi smartphones as SIP clients? Does
this work properly? What models/brands are optimal for this (in terms of
ease of use, battery life etc)?
www.acrobits.cz has Acrobits and Groundwire, which are both great on
On 05/07/12 13:04, Benny Amorsen wrote:
man, 07 05 2012 kl. 12:03 +0200, skrev Bart Coninckx:
What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800
( http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection losses?
I don't know
Bart Coninckx wrote:
I understand smartphones is not a good option, but what about these WiFi
SIP phones?
I thing smartfones simply lack a business grade softhone implementation.
WiFi SIP phones share some problem with smartphones: battery runtime
and, most important, roaming and handover.
On 05/07/12 13:50, giovanni.v wrote:
I thing smartfones simply lack a business grade softhone implementation.
WiFi SIP phones share some problem with smartphones: battery runtime
and, most important, roaming and handover.
In WiFi network handling roaming/handover is up to the client, this is
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:03:17PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800 (
http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
experience with those? Would these also suffer from connection
losses?
I've been using a UTStarcom GF-210 for the last
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 19:03 +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:03:17PM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
What about phones like the Unidata WPU-7800 (
http://www.udcsystems.com/product/wpu7800.php) ? Does anyone have
experience with those? Would these also suffer from
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:14:36PM +0200, Hans Witvliet wrote:
Hope that these are better that the utstar F1000:
Keep on re-chargibg as battery is empty in no-time, and security is
lousy; just wep, no wpa.
WPA and WPA2. Battery lasts about a day in dual mode, much longer in
2G-only of course.
18 matches
Mail list logo
