RE: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum: Linksys WRT54G

2004-11-22 Thread Paul Rodan
I am quite interested in this as well. I didn't realize registrations are the #1 cause of load on an asterisk server, we haven't gotten to that kind of usage just yet. People were having problems with compiling Asterisk on a hacked Linksys WRT54G, issues with compiling against uClibc and some

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum: Linksys WRT54G

2004-11-22 Thread Tracy R Reed
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Paul Rodan spake thusly: I am quite interested in this as well. I didn't realize registrations are the #1 cause of load on an asterisk server, we haven't gotten to that kind of usage just yet. I don't think they are, are they? How could a few

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum: Linksys WRT54G

2004-11-22 Thread Matt Riddell
Tracy R Reed wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Paul Rodan spake thusly: I am quite interested in this as well. I didn't realize registrations are the #1 cause of load on an asterisk server, we haven't gotten to that kind of usage just yet. I don't think they are, are they? How