Looks like a DNS issue.
On 21 April 2013 11:05, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello List.
Last month i started to face a strange issue on an asterisk server
1.8.9.3 built on Centos 5.3 x86_64 dedicated server.
out of the blue UDP stops responding .. and keep getting the following
thank you , but how would it be DNS issue while other users drop
unreachable too?
all operators and SIP Peers go unreachable .. not only unable to register.
oe peer using FQDN the rest are IP addresses.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:18 PM, dotnetdub dotnet...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like a DNS issue.
ok it seems a bug in asterisk .. work around is to add the FQDNS to
the hosts file and try to setup local DNS
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you , but how would it be DNS issue while other users drop
unreachable too?
all operators and SIP Peers go
I don't know with this version but certainly the SIP stack in earlier
version would get blocked when it couldn't do a name resolution and cause
symptoms exactly as you describe. It shouldn't happen but there you go.
On 21 April 2013 12:24, Dereck D derec...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you , but how
Hi, Vitaly:
Vitaly Oborsky wrote:
Situation such. There is an asterisk working as office pbx. 6 fxo - 18
fxs ports. All works perfectly, but some times in a week something
occurs. Could not catch what exactly yet. But symptoms such. The
asterisk infinitely writes the message of a type to
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 05:32:33PM +0300, Vitaly Oborsky wrote:
Situation such. There is an asterisk working as office pbx. 6 fxo - 18
fxs ports. All works perfectly, but some times in a week something
occurs. Could not catch what exactly yet. But symptoms such. The
asterisk infinitely writes
Thanks for the hints, 'overlapdial=yes' did the trick.
br,
kurt
--On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:08:08 PM +0200 Peter Svensson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Christian Victor wrote:
maybe I oversee somth. very obvious, but I'm a little puzzled about
the following 'error':
Hi Kurt!
maybe I oversee somth. very obvious, but I'm a little puzzled about the
following 'error':
When I make a call from the PBX to * I get number not available, but on
debug I see, that asterisk is searching just for the first digit in the
extension, which of course doesn't exist, eg:
I
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Christian Victor wrote:
maybe I oversee somth. very obvious, but I'm a little puzzled about the
following 'error':
When I make a call from the PBX to * I get number not available, but on
debug I see, that asterisk is searching just for the first digit in the
I think there are issues with combining flash-hook supervised transfers
with meetme conference bridges. Can you find out if that took place, i.e.
someone tries to transfer into a meetme conference?
Mark
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Andy Hester wrote:
Wondered if anybody might have some ideas about
No, I have Meetme on an extension, but the users don't even know about it
and the ext# for it is in a completely different range.
Hrm okay.
I don't know if I explained it adequately looking back on my post. The
situation persisted over 8 to 10 hours and through numerous calls. what
seems
11 matches
Mail list logo
