Hmmm. Ok, that's true. At the very least it will create confusing CDR's I think... maybe. We're not billing our OnNet traffic at all. Only the traffic that goes OffNet, to our switch is billed (if it leaves our switch that is...).
I was thinking earlier too that we only need progressinband on traffic that goes to the PSTN, via our switch. OnNet traffic will never generate reorder tones and such. The docs say that progressinband can either go into the general section of sip.conf, or the extension. I couldn't get it to have any effect at the extension level. Doug. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric "ManxPower" Wieling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 6:47 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Sends 180-RINGINGto UAeven > withprogressinband=yes > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > No... but if we answer the call before dialling, isn't that > going to cause a whole world of billing hurt? > > You are only answering the call leg from the Polycom to > Asterisk. You > are not answering the Asterisk -> PSTN leg (I assume that is the only > leg you bill for) > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
