On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 08:49 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I understand it means that the *hardware* in your computer
*acknowledges* the call as soon as it is recieved and then sends it to
asterisk dialplan for processing.
Hrm. Yes, that is what I got from it. But in my case the
At 07:34 AM 02/03/2006, you wrote:
I am pressuming that since I can use functions like Wait(), then
Answer() in dialplan to actually delay answering (for the Wait()
time) that Asterisk actually acknowledges the call.
I think you need to use dial instead of answer. You can put a timeout
in
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 10:59 -0800, Ira wrote:
I think you need to use dial instead of answer. You can put a timeout
in dial and if the call is hung up dial will exit.
Hung up? By whom? Assume this: while Dial() is working (and waiting
for the timeout) somebody has picked up a phone that
At 11:38 AM 02/03/2006, you wrote:
Hung up? By whom? Assume this: while Dial() is working (and waiting
for the timeout) somebody has picked up a phone that shares the POTS
line with Asterisk. Will that second pick up of the POTS line look like
a hangup on the POTS line to Asterisk while it is
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 12:47 -0800, Ira wrote:
Sure seems to work that way here. I have a 4 line analog phone
sharing the phones with * and if I grab it before a * goes to
voicemail it never goes to voicemail. Both my analog and SIP phones
are ringing at the same time.
Indeed it does
] delaying answer for a number of ringsor
anamount of time
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 22:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-September/125146
.html
OK. The hardware is a wildcard though. How does that answer apply?
Isn't it asterisk itself