[asterisk-users] How to test BRI lines energy saving mode ?

2010-10-06 Thread Olivier
Hello, If my understanding is correct, these days it seems that many ISDN BRI lines are configured in energy saving mode in which signalling D-channel is dropped until a new call comes in. Is it possible to replicate this behaviour with Asterisk (when Asterisk is in NT mode and is seen as a

[asterisk-users] Which virtualization tech to get PCI assignment ?

2010-10-06 Thread Olivier
Hello, I'm looking for a virtualization technique with which I could easily assign PCI/PCIe boards to virtual machines. If this matters, I don't need to be able to use several boards nor to run several virtual machines at the same time as I'm just looking for a way to easily mimic several

Re: [asterisk-users] Which virtualization tech to get PCI assignment ?

2010-10-06 Thread Thorolf Godawa
Hi, I'm looking for a virtualization technique with which I could easily assign PCI/PCIe boards to virtual machines. you might try opensource Xen with paravirtualized Linux-guests, which supports PCI-passthrough quite good. Running several Asterisk-servers at one time might be problematic,

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941 localized menus with SIP firmware

2010-10-06 Thread Olivier
2010/10/5 Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/showthread.php?t=188877 For those not fluent in german, what is this thread telling ? ~ Andrew lathama Latham lath...@gmail.com * Learn more about OSS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software * Learn more

Re: [asterisk-users] Which virtualization tech to get PCI assignment ?

2010-10-06 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Olivier wrote: Hello, I'm looking for a virtualization technique with which I could easily assign PCI/PCIe boards to virtual machines. If this matters, I don't need to be able to use several boards nor to run several virtual machines at the same time as I'm just looking

Re: [asterisk-users] How to test BIG traffic through DAHDI/WANPIPEinterfaces

2010-10-06 Thread Danny Dias
Thanks Steve, I got the picture :) THANK!!! But my doubt is about the cable, what cable should i use? i have a Sangoma A108D in one machine (one machine with one card). What cable should i do? how can i make it? Best Regards! 2010/10/5 Steve Murphy m...@parsetree.com On Tue, Oct 5,

[asterisk-users] MYSQL ADDON INSTALLATION ERROR

2010-10-06 Thread Rizwan Hisham
Hi All, Please refresh my memory. I am trying to install asterisk after 2 years. I hav'nt used it since 2008 (version 1.4.2). Now I am trying to install 1.8.0-rc2 on centos 5.5 but getting the following errors. app_mysql.c:33:25: error: mysql/mysql.h: No such file or directory app_mysql.c: In

Re: [asterisk-users] MYSQL ADDON INSTALLATION ERROR

2010-10-06 Thread Gareth Blades
Rizwan Hisham wrote: Hi All, Please refresh my memory. I am trying to install asterisk after 2 years. I hav'nt used it since 2008 (version 1.4.2). Now I am trying to install 1.8.0-rc2 on centos 5.5 but getting the following errors. app_mysql.c:33:25: error: mysql/mysql.h: No such file or

Re: [asterisk-users] MYSQL ADDON INSTALLATION ERROR

2010-10-06 Thread Muhammad Nuzaihan Kamalluddin
Hi Ridwan, You would need to install mysql-devel via yum. Best Regards, Muhammad Nuzaihan Kamal Network Consultant Mobile: +65 97473874 Asfa Systems Pte Ltd 91, Alps Avenue. #03-10. Singapore 498787 Tel: +65 62538211 Fax: +65 62504814 www.asfasystems.com.sg pub 4096R/36630777 2010-07-10

Re: [asterisk-users] MYSQL ADDON INSTALLATION ERROR

2010-10-06 Thread Steve Howes
On 6 Oct 2010, at 11:35, Rizwan Hisham wrote: Hi All, Please refresh my memory. I am trying to install asterisk after 2 years. I hav'nt used it since 2008 (version 1.4.2). Now I am trying to install 1.8.0-rc2 on centos 5.5 but getting the following errors. snip Plz help. You need

Re: [asterisk-users] Implementing more than one asterisk instance in the same hardware machine?

2010-10-06 Thread Olivier
2010/10/5 Nikhil d.nik...@cem-solutions.net Hi We can run multiple instance of asterisk in same box with different IP and port. U need to install asterisk in different location eg: 1: /home/asterisk1/ 2 , : /home/asterisk2 ,and run both from that path , listen ip and port should be

[asterisk-users] AMI getting related channels in Ringing state

2010-10-06 Thread Daniel Tryba
Issuing the AMI Status command results in a list of active channels. But how to figure out which channels are related before the call is answered? 2 channels below are somehow associated, but how can I be 100% sure they are related in order to implement a redirect of the incoming call to another

Re: [asterisk-users] MYSQL ADDON INSTALLATION ERROR

2010-10-06 Thread Rizwan Hisham
Thank you all. It is now installed. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Steve Howes steve-li...@geekinter.netwrote: On 6 Oct 2010, at 11:35, Rizwan Hisham wrote: Hi All, Please refresh my memory. I am trying to install asterisk after 2 years. I hav'nt used it since 2008 (version 1.4.2). Now

Re: [asterisk-users] How to test BIG traffic through DAHDI/WANPIPEinterfaces

2010-10-06 Thread Ryan Wagoner
The Loop Back Plug on the link you provided is correct. You take a few inches of CAT5 and remove the outer jacket. Loop the wires into the RJ-45 connector like the diagram shows and then crimp. Ryan On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Danny Dias ing.diasda...@gmail.com wrote: Hello my friend

[asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Rizwan Hisham
Hi All, Please can anyone tell me the difference between 1.4, 1.6 and 1.8 asterisk versions. Thanks -- Best Regards Rizwan Qureshi -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk?

[asterisk-users] Page minimum number of extensions

2010-10-06 Thread Matteo Fortini
Hi, if I Page more than one extension, then the MeetMe conference stays up even if all the called extensions aren't available or are hung up. Is there a way of keeping track of how many extensions are attached to the conference, and require a number or a particular extension to be present?

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco SIP 8.5 and 9.0 Issues

2010-10-06 Thread Gerard
Hi James, I have a smartNet as well, I contacted cisco for a login, so when I go to the support section for 7900 series phones, then hit Download Software, it lists this for the 7962G : Expand all | Close all Latest Releases 9.0(3) All Releases SIP v.9 9.0(3) 9.0(2)SR2 9.0(2)SR1 SIP v.8 8.5(4)

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco SIP 8.5 and 9.0 Issues

2010-10-06 Thread JR Richardson
Hi list, I was wondering if anyone had any solution to either one of two issues I'm having: I have a cisco 7962G with the latest (from cisco) 8.5(4) SIP Firmware, it works very well for the most part, but after less then a week of heavy usage, eventually the phone gets into a state where it

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco SIP 8.5 and 9.0 Issues

2010-10-06 Thread Gerard
I think you're right JR, that has been my experience as well, I've run just great with sip 7.something firmwares for years.. unfortunately those don't support the wireless headsets that the people I support want. My boss really likes the cisco phones, the hardware feels really solid, I wouldn't

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8: Warning messages in CLI while putting a SIP-Call on hold

2010-10-06 Thread Karsten Wemheuer
Hi, while testing current release candidate 1.8.0-rc2 I stumbled on a weird behavior. I did not find any hints in the archives or at the bug tracker. Two SIP-Clients are connected (both on the local net, no NAT). The RTP stream flows directly between the phones. If I set phone A on hold, the

Re: [asterisk-users] AMI getting related channels in Ringing state

2010-10-06 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 01:56:55PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote: Issuing the AMI Status command results in a list of active channels. But how to figure out which channels are related before the call is answered? CoreShowChannels gives a little bit of extra data in the originator channel:

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Danny Nicholas
_ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rizwan Hisham Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:15 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Difference Hi All, Please can

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco SIP 8.5 and 9.0 Issues

2010-10-06 Thread Peder
Use Polycom, but if you really must use cisco phones, downgrade to 7.5. I've got a lot of 79xx phones out there and 7.5 is the last stable release as far as I'm concerned. It just seems to work, no periodic reboots needed, or any other quirkiness like with the newer firmware's. The feature set

Re: [asterisk-users] Cisco 7941 localized menus with SIP firmware

2010-10-06 Thread Andrew Latham
It is describing the method of copying the German localization over the United_States_English so the phones use German ~ Andrew lathama Latham lath...@gmail.com * Learn more about OSS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software * Learn more about Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux

[asterisk-users] using better quality wav or mp3 in Asterisk 1.2.x

2010-10-06 Thread Zarko Zivanovic
Hello, I would need a little help about using 16 bit wav or mp3 files for moh on asterisk 1.2.x When i try to use these files as moh, the caller gets disconnected. Please advise. Regards, Z. Zivanovic -- _ -- Bandwidth

Re: [asterisk-users] How to test BIG traffic throughDAHDI/WANPIPEinterfaces

2010-10-06 Thread Ingmar Steen
Hi Danny, We're using A104 cards which reduces the complexity of the necessary cable (it's a regular T1/E1 cross cable). In case of a A108, the cable that would come closest to what we're doing is combining the A108 Straight Thru Y Cable and the A108 Cross-Over Y Cable (or getting both and

Re: [asterisk-users] Repeated: Got SIP response 489 Bad eventback from

2010-10-06 Thread Gopalakrishnan A.N
Hi James, I too facing the same issue whereas in the inbound call I am able to receive the call, when I pickup the receiver it hangsup. I am getting the NOTIFY option.. the log as follows, -- SIP read from 98.158.181.173:5060: NOTIFY sip:pbxfami...@10.0.8.84:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP

[asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendation for restaurant kitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Andy Graybeal
Greetings, I need a 2 way intercom for separate kitchens to communicate without having to walk back and forth. The speaker has to be loud but clear, not distorted. Sometimes the kitchens can be noisy. It needs to be easy to use. It needs to be easy to clean. It would be nice if it used POE.

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendation for restaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andy Graybeal Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:07 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Cc: t...@casanueva.com Subject: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Rizwan Hisham
Is there any major architectural difference between 1.4 and 1.8? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: -- *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Rizwan

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Danny Nicholas
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Rizwan Hisham Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 7:15 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Difference Hi All, Please can anyone tell me

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Steve Edwards
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Rizwan Hisham wrote: Is there any major architectural difference between 1.4 and 1.8? Nope. The developer's just got tired of typing .4 Of course, the joke's on them -- 1.8 is only .4 better than 1.4. -- Thanks in advance,

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendation for restaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Andy Graybeal
Polycom 501's are pretty good and relatively inexpensive. Danny, Should I be worried that the Polycom 501 has been discontinued? What does this even imply... that they won't be putting out any BIOS updates (if there even is a BIOS on phones...) Sounds like they'd be cheap to get on ebay

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Zeeshan Zakaria
For a production environment, 1.4 is the most stable, and it has everything one needs to setup a telecom platform. As per my understanding 1.6 never got the same recognition for stability as 1.4, plus it doesn't have any significant advantages over 1.4. The newer version 1.8 series might be my

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendationfor restaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andy Graybeal Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:59 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Rizwan Hisham
Back in the days i heard that they have changed the architecture in 1.6 and its a lot better than 1.4 (6 times better call handling and robust architecture, someone told me). If they have decided to take the 1.6 architecture to the next level in the new 1.8 version then its a good thing. On Wed,

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Zeeshan Zakaria
Here is a presentation from Kevin P. Fleming, Director of Software Technologies at Digium. Information might be old by now still gives a good overview of what is new in 1.6: http://www.asterisk-tag.org/2008/slides/Kevin-Fleming-Asterisk-Tag-2008.pdf Summary of his presentation is as follows: –

Re: [asterisk-users] Difference

2010-10-06 Thread Miguel Molina
I find 1.6.2.13 version is stable for trunk call routing, and it should be too for basic call center use. The asterisk team has made some architectural improvements (moving to astobj2 a lot of internal structures, and much more you may not see from a user perspective) but given the several

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendationfor restaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Steve Edwards
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, Danny Nicholas wrote: Polycom 501's are pretty good and relatively inexpensive. [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andy Graybeal Should I be worried that the Polycom 501 has been discontinued? What does this even imply... that they won't be

Re: [asterisk-users] using better quality wav or mp3 in Asterisk 1.2.x

2010-10-06 Thread Kyle Kienapfel
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5509 (20101006) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk sharing a line with POTS handsets: how to interoperate cleanly?

2010-10-06 Thread Kyle Kienapfel
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Roger Burton West ro...@firedrake.orgwrote: I now have an OpenVox A400P and it is working well. Thanks to Ade Vickers for the recommendation, which I second. However, I need to make a slow transition between a conventional multiple-extension setup and a full

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendationfor restaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Andy Graybeal
It is already a relative PITA to get BIOS updates - that being said, when you are able to get them, there are plenty and Polycom is pretty good about updating BIOS for discontinued phones. It has been my experience that it is easier to get Polycom firmware updates (just download off their

[asterisk-users] AMI connection limit

2010-10-06 Thread Jerry Geis
Is there a limit to the AMI connections? I have upto 3 process that might connect and originate calls, 2 of those processes are very infrequent - however the main one can issue a number of calls one right after the other. I am seeing a message when I am logging failed manager connection

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendationforrestaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andy Graybeal Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 11:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom

[asterisk-users] ADA: DOA?

2010-10-06 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
Hey, all. While ADA can still be downloaded, that's about all that I see. No development, no recent mention, and -- perhaps worst of all -- it appears not to work properly under 64-bit systems. So, assuming Digium's abandoned it, are there any suggestions of alternatives? Right now, I'm

[asterisk-users] SPA-2102 sending local IP instead of WAN IP in SIP packets

2010-10-06 Thread bruce bruce
Hi Guys, This is such an annoying issue whenever it comes up. The sender and receive always receive the source public IP no matter what in the IP packets but then SIP packets go out with something like 192.168.0.20. In this instance, a Bell Canada DSL modem is installed and I saw the SPA-2102

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendationforrestaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Andy Graybeal
In my experience, the 501 has very good speakerphone quality. It has 4 programmable buttons so the cooks can hit one button and connect. We have one mounted on the wall in our computer room. Yes, the speaker is under the handset, but you could take the handset off and tape down the switch

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 wayintercom recommendationforrestaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andy Graybeal Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:09 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 2 wayintercom

Re: [asterisk-users] 2 way intercom recommendationforrestaurantkitchens

2010-10-06 Thread Mike
Polycom 501s were designed before the PoE standards were set in stone. So the PoE is actually not part of the phone, but part of the special PoE cable that is optional. So you absolutely need that special RJ45-like cable. Mike -Original Message- From:

Re: [asterisk-users] AMI connection limit

2010-10-06 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 12:40 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] AMI connection limit

[asterisk-users] CALLERPRES() with Queue

2010-10-06 Thread Rodrigo Lang
Good afternoon list, I'm having a problem using the function CALLERPRES() when connection to a Queue(). When I call an extension, before the Dial (), I select the function CALLERPRES () as unavailable to link the extension comes as anonymous. But if I call a queue before the Queue (), I select

[asterisk-users] How to learn encrypted VoIP development for embedded systems

2010-10-06 Thread Zeeshan Zakaria
Hi list, A few times I have been asked if I could do encrypted VoIP development, for embedded systems, and in C++. And my answer has been in negative. Now I am thinking I should start learning how to do it, but I have no clue where to start from. I have been developing in Java for some time now,

[asterisk-users] integrate Intertel Axxess with Asterisk

2010-10-06 Thread marvin horst
Has anyone successfully integrated Asterisk with an Inter-tel Axxess phone system via a SIP trunk using the IPRC card? -- Marvin Horst -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk?

Re: [asterisk-users] OpenVPN tunnel and one-way audio - Do I still need a SIP proxy?

2010-10-06 Thread Dennison Williams
On 09/22/2010 08:36 AM, Carlos Chavez wrote: Do you have a localnet statement in your sip.conf? That and using nat=no will make sure Asterisk does not replace the IP address in the Invite. I just wanted to give a +1 for this response. I am using openvpn to connect road warriors and

Re: [asterisk-users] SPA-2102 sending local IP instead of WAN IP in SIP packets

2010-10-06 Thread Kyle Kienapfel
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:50 PM, bruce bruce bruceb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, This is such an annoying issue whenever it comes up. The sender and receive always receive the source public IP no matter what in the IP packets but then SIP packets go out with something like 192.168.0.20. In

Re: [asterisk-users] How to test BRI lines energy saving mode ?

2010-10-06 Thread Lyle Giese
Olivier wrote: Hello, If my understanding is correct, these days it seems that many ISDN BRI lines are configured in energy saving mode in which signalling D-channel is dropped until a new call comes in. Is it possible to replicate this behaviour with Asterisk (when Asterisk is in NT mode

Re: [asterisk-users] DISA does not accept pause from cellphones when upgrading from 1.4 to 1.6

2010-10-06 Thread Matt Riddell
On 5/10/10 8:17 AM, Alejandro Recarey wrote: I just upgraded my asterisk box from 1.4 + Zaptel to 1.6 + DAHDI and services I was using perfectly before are suddenly broken. I have a DISA access configured, and my companies employees use if to dial into the companies extension from their cell