Re: [asterisk-users] Queue Agent Getting Additional Calls When on the Phone

2010-10-15 Thread Warren Selby
Sorry for the top-post... If you do a core show application AddQueueMember from the cli, you'll see the option I was referring to. You'll also need to make sure you're properly reporting device state to asterisk. I think this means you need to set a call-limit for each sip peer that you want

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue Agent Getting Additional Calls When on the Phone

2010-10-15 Thread Matt Darnell
You'll also need to make sure you're properly reporting device state to asterisk. I think this means you need to set a call-limit for each sip peer that you want to monitor in sip.conf (we use 25 so there are no accidental limits actually applied), and setup hints in your extensions.conf

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue Agent Getting Additional Calls When on the Phone

2010-10-15 Thread Сикорский Сергей
15.10.2010 9:40, Warren Selby пишет: I think this means you need to set a call-limit for each sip peer Is there any alternative for obsolete call-limit option in 1.6/1.8? Thanks, --Warren Selby On Oct 14, 2010, at 11:36 PM, Matt Darnellmattdarn...@gmail.com wrote: Warren, I tried using

[asterisk-users] Kernel panic (asterisk 1.8.0-rc3, dahdi-linux-2.4)

2010-10-15 Thread Karsten Wemheuer
Hi, I setup an asterisk system (asterisk 1.8-rc3, dahdi-linux-2.4.0 with dahdi-extra from Tzafrirs git, kernel 2.6.35.4). The hardware is an older pc system with Celeron CPU (2.5 GHz) with a Beronet BN4S0 ISDN card. The system starts without any errors. I discovered a severe issue. The kernel

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue Agent Getting Additional Calls When on the Phone

2010-10-15 Thread Leif Madsen
On 10-10-15 04:10 AM, Сикорский Сергей wrote: 15.10.2010 9:40, Warren Selby пишет: I think this means you need to set a call-limit for each sip peer Is there any alternative for obsolete call-limit option in 1.6/1.8? The correct answer is to use ringinuse=no in queues.conf and callcounter=yes

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Andrew Latham
pbx$ man sox allpass frequency[k] width[h|k|o|q] Apply a two-pole all-pass filter with central frequency (in Hz) frequency, and filter-width width. An all- pass filter changes the audio's frequency to phase relationship without changing its frequency to amplitude

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Danny Nicholas
_ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of jon pounder Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:10 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix On 10/15/2010 09:59 AM, Danny Nicholas

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Danny Nicholas wrote: Hello list, I am about to have to dump Asterisk in favor of some other VOIP/PBX solution; the reason? I have 304 voice prompts recorded as 22Khz wav format files that sound like crumpling paper whenever I convert them to the 8Khz

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Steve Edwards
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Danny Nicholas wrote:   I am about to have to dump Asterisk in favor of some other VOIP/PBX solution;  the reason?  I have 304 voice prompts recorded as 22Khz wav format files that sound like crumpling paper whenever I convert them to the 8Khz wav/gsm format

Re: [asterisk-users] fraud advice

2010-10-15 Thread Steve Edwards
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, bruce bruce wrote: But it also sickens me at how badly Asterisk is made to not cope with situations like this and worse than that is FreePBX. Kind of like blaming the gun manufacturer instead of the criminal with their finger on the trigger? Is there some gaping hole in

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Zeeshan Zakaria
I never had this problem, and this is certainly not asterisk's fault. Probably your conversion is not good. Can you email me a file and I'll do conversion on my end, and if sounds good, let you know how I did it. Then a script can be written to convert them all. Zeeshan A Zakaria --

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Andrew Latham
You want to pay attention the low-pass and high-pass filter A step conversion will help you see the issues. Go halfway first and look for the change and adjust your filter. ~ Andrew lathama Latham lath...@gmail.com * Learn more about OSS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software *

Re: [asterisk-users] fraud advice

2010-10-15 Thread Zeeshan Zakaria
For future I would highly recommend to have at least fail2ban installed. This way sipvicous IPs will be blocked instantly before they could create any damage. Also I prefer to limit International calling to only certain limit, e.g. only for $10 per account, but this depends upon how your business

[asterisk-users] Audio problems on cable modem link

2010-10-15 Thread Michelle Dupuis
We have a small office installation running over a cable modem. (8M down, 500k up confirmed with numerous speed test sites) When a single call is up, call quality is fine. When a second call is up, outbound audio is immediately choppy. We're using ulaw, and confirmed that traffic with 2

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Danny Nicholas wrote: -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gordon Henderson Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:18 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

Re: [asterisk-users] Echo on PRI after upgrading to Asterisk 1.6.2 from 1.2

2010-10-15 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On 10/15/2010 08:55 AM, Jared Geiger wrote: I've recently upgraded an Asterisk system from 1.2 to 1.6.2 (did a full reformat and recompile) and I started getting echo over the PRI. I've tried the default settings for echo in the system.conf file as well as I've compiled OSLEC to try and see

Re: [asterisk-users] Audio problems on cable modem link

2010-10-15 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! Can someone suggest where to look? Could this be the ITSP? - turn off IAX trunking mode - test with SIP to find if it IAX causing the trouble - capture the RTP traffice on the other side and let wireshark have a look at that stats (loss, jitter) Philipp --

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Deneen
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: The original one is super quiet - obviously not Allison in a studio... Listen to the gsm in Asterisk to see my quandary... What is the end use here? Who will be listening to the recordings? Users on PSTN and mobile

Re: [asterisk-users] fraud advice

2010-10-15 Thread Steve Totaro
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com wrote: On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, bruce bruce wrote: But it also sickens me at how badly Asterisk is made to not cope with situations like this and worse than that is FreePBX. Kind of like blaming the gun manufacturer

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mark Deneen Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:13 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix On

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 10/15/2010 08:59 AM, Danny Nicholas wrote: Hello list, I am about to have to dump Asterisk in favor of some other VOIP/PBX solution; the reason? I have 304 voice prompts recorded as 22Khz wav format files that sound like crumpling paper whenever I convert them to the 8Khz

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Deneen
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: End use is Telephone Banking, so you've nailed the target audience. BTW, the highpass and lowpass filters seem to help, but since I stopped math at pre-calculus, the explanation of the Butterworth filter is beyond my

Re: [asterisk-users] Echo on PRI after upgrading to Asterisk 1.6.2 from 1.2

2010-10-15 Thread Jared Geiger
[r...@voice ~]# cat /etc/dahdi/system.conf # Autogenerated by /usr/sbin/dahdi_genconf on Fri Sep 24 21:44:03 2010 # If you edit this file and execute /usr/sbin/dahdi_genconf again, # your manual changes will be LOST. # Dahdi Configuration File # # This file is parsed by the Dahdi Configurator,

Re: [asterisk-users] fraud advice

2010-10-15 Thread Matt Desbiens
We took a pretty nasty hit one time, a system administrator didnt listen to us about changing the passwords. Luckily they took part of the blame in that, and we split the 1800$ it cost us in half. We could have changed them, and she didnt change them, so we were both at fault. Like said

Re: [asterisk-users] fraud advice

2010-10-15 Thread Steve Totaro
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@sunfone.com wrote: snipped (BTW Sierra Leone is in West Africa, not the Middle East.) True ;)  Most of the calls were Iraq, UAE, Lebanon... Found another one today that was 2.5 DAYS long to Chile.  Bizarre. j Not bizarre at all.

[asterisk-users] SIP - no audio behind nat problem

2010-10-15 Thread Zarko Zivanovic
Hello, We have 2 grandstream GX 2000 phones behind NAT and Asterisk outside this natted network. We have the issue with calls to these SIP phones - no audio. It is probably the problem with port forwarding on router - but I am not sure how can I forward same sip ports (5004 to 5100) to

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP - no audio behind nat problem

2010-10-15 Thread Roger Burton West
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:22:07PM +0200, Zarko Zivanovic wrote: We have 2 grandstream GX 2000 phones behind NAT and Asterisk outside this natted network. The simplest solution will be to stick another Asterisk box inside the NAT and tunnel IAX or SIP over a VPN. R --

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP - no audio behind nat problem

2010-10-15 Thread A J Stiles
On Friday 15 Oct 2010, Zarko Zivanovic wrote: Hello, We have 2 grandstream GX 2000 phones behind NAT and Asterisk outside this natted network. We have the issue with calls to these SIP phones - no audio. It is probably the problem with port forwarding on router - but I am not sure how can

Re: [asterisk-users] Audio problems on cable modem link

2010-10-15 Thread Joel Maslak
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Michelle Dupuis mdup...@ocg.ca wrote: When a single call is up, call quality is fine. When a second call is up, outbound audio is immediately choppy. We're using ulaw, and confirmed that traffic with 2 calls is 175kbps in/out. (IAX connection out) Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP - no audio behind nat problem

2010-10-15 Thread Danny Nicholas
-Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of A J Stiles Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 11:38 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP - no audio behind

Re: [asterisk-users] fraud advice

2010-10-15 Thread Carlos Chavez
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 07:29 -0700, Steve Edwards wrote: On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, bruce bruce wrote: But it also sickens me at how badly Asterisk is made to not cope with situations like this and worse than that is FreePBX. Kind of like blaming the gun manufacturer instead of the criminal

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Joel Maslak
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: Don't know if this will make acceptable GSM files, but should help with the WAV ones. Are you using GSM to talk to an ITSP (the idea of banking voice calls going across the internet makes me cringe)? If not, what are

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue Agent Getting Additional Calls When on the Phone

2010-10-15 Thread Matt Darnell
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Leif Madsen leif.mad...@asteriskdocs.org wrote: On 10-10-15 04:10 AM, Сикорский Сергей wrote: 15.10.2010 9:40, Warren Selby пишет: I think this means you need to set a call-limit for each sip peer Is there any alternative for obsolete call-limit option in

Re: [asterisk-users] Audio problems on cable modem link

2010-10-15 Thread Paul Belanger
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Philipp von Klitzing klitz...@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de wrote: - turn off IAX trunking mode I would disagree, you want to enable trunking with multiple call. It will reduce patch overhead, leading to less bandwidth. OP could enable jitterbuffer, if not

Re: [asterisk-users] Queue Agent Getting Additional Calls When on the Phone

2010-10-15 Thread Mark Deneen
2010/10/15 Matt Darnell mattdarn...@gmail.com: On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Leif Madsen leif.mad...@asteriskdocs.org wrote: On 10-10-15 04:10 AM, Сикорский Сергей wrote: 15.10.2010 9:40, Warren Selby пишет: I think this means you need to set a call-limit for each sip peer Is there any

Re: [asterisk-users] Audio problems on cable modem link

2010-10-15 Thread Michelle Dupuis
Jitterbuffer affects inbound audio only, not outbound (the other side hears the choppiness) so I don't think that will help/ Trunking only reduces overhead after 4+ calls, so that shouldn't help either. (Since this occurs at 2 calls) I can't wireshark the other end since the other end is my

Re: [asterisk-users] Audio problems on cable modem link

2010-10-15 Thread Paul Belanger
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Michelle Dupuis mdup...@ocg.ca wrote: Jitterbuffer affects inbound audio only, not outbound (the other side hears the choppiness) so I don't think that will help/ If your problems with audio are at the far end, I don't expect there is much you can do. Try a

Re: [asterisk-users] Audio problems on cable modem link

2010-10-15 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! Trunking only reduces overhead after 4+ calls, so that shouldn't help either. (Since this occurs at 2 calls) Trunking requires a timing source, and you might have trouble with your timing, that is why I suggested this (and because you did not tell us wether you have trunking enabled or

Re: [asterisk-users] Kernel panic (asterisk 1.8.0-rc3, dahdi-linux-2.4)

2010-10-15 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On 10/15/2010 04:00 AM, Karsten Wemheuer wrote: I setup an asterisk system (asterisk 1.8-rc3, dahdi-linux-2.4.0 with dahdi-extra from Tzafrirs git, kernel 2.6.35.4). The hardware is an older pc system with Celeron CPU (2.5 GHz) with a Beronet BN4S0 ISDN card. The system starts without any

Re: [asterisk-users] Echo on PRI after upgrading to Asterisk 1.6.2 from 1.2

2010-10-15 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On 10/15/2010 10:33 AM, Jared Geiger wrote: This might be my problem?*** [r...@voice ~]# grep -E ^echo /etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf * *So I added this under [channels]: echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=no echotraining=800* Most likely (unless you were including another file

Re: [asterisk-users] Echo on PRI after upgrading to Asterisk 1.6.2 from 1.2

2010-10-15 Thread Paul Belanger
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Jared Geiger compuw...@gmail.com wrote: I've recently upgraded an Asterisk system from 1.2 to 1.6.2 (did a full reformat and recompile) and I started getting echo over the PRI. I did an update on a server last year, had the same problem. I needed to explicitly

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP - no audio behind nat problem

2010-10-15 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:22:07PM +0200, Zarko Zivanovic wrote: We have 2 grandstream GX 2000 phones behind NAT and Asterisk outside this natted network. We have the issue with calls to these SIP phones - no audio. Tell us more about your settings. I have a GXP2000 behing NAT connected to

Re: [asterisk-users] drop dead fix

2010-10-15 Thread Steve Edwards
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming There were some comments in other replies about your files being 'quiet' (low average volume level)... this won't help your situation at all, because it means that any artifacts caused by resampling and

Re: [asterisk-users] Echo on PRI after upgrading to Asterisk 1.6.2 from 1.2

2010-10-15 Thread Jared Geiger
I haven't heard if this fixed it yet. However I was seeing the echo cancelers loaded before so I never realized I'd have to do this. Its a FreePBX install also so I checked all the include files and didn't see a reference to these values anywhere. Thanks everyone for the input, I should know soon