[asterisk-users] Permanent sip and agi debug on?

2011-11-09 Thread David Cunningham
Hi all, I can't find the answer to this via google - is there some way to permanently enable sip set debug on and agi set debug on in Asterisk? I want this to be automatically enabled even after restarts. Thanks for any advice. -- David Cunningham, Voisonics http://voisonics.com/ US toll-free:

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread A J Stiles
On Tuesday 08 November 2011, Yaroslav Panych wrote: Greetings I have found next paragraph in Licence file(source root) Digium, Inc. (formerly Linux Support Services) holds copyright and/or sufficient licenses to all components of the Asterisk package, and therefore can grant, at its sole

Re: [asterisk-users] No call progress sounds

2011-11-09 Thread cb
On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:55 AM, isr...@gmail.com wrote: There is a bug which blocks call progress message 8 which was fixed but I don't remember in which version Try upgrading to latest 1.6 version Before we opened for the day today I updated to 1.6.2.20 and that seems to have solved the

Re: [asterisk-users] State of Asterisk+Virtualization+Timing

2011-11-09 Thread Anton Kvashenkin
Is anybody using pci-passthrough? 2011/11/9 Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com Hans, Thank you so much for your response. We will be moving everything to VM soon. Cheers, Nick. On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Hans Witvliet aster...@a-domani.nl wrote: On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 11:45 -0500,

Re: [asterisk-users] Permanent sip and agi debug on?

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 11/09/2011 04:22 AM, David Cunningham wrote: Hi all, I can't find the answer to this via google - is there some way to permanently enable sip set debug on and agi set debug on in Asterisk? I want this to be automatically enabled even after restarts. In recent versions of Asterisk, you can

Re: [asterisk-users] State of Asterisk+Virtualization+Timing

2011-11-09 Thread Nick Khamis
Hahah... I was waiting on the sideline for this question. Nick. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Anton Kvashenkin anton.juga...@gmail.com wrote: Is anybody using pci-passthrough? 2011/11/9 Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com Hans, Thank you so much for your response. We will be moving everything

Re: [asterisk-users] [OT] Re: Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 11/08/2011 07:54 PM, Raj Mathur (राज माथुर) wrote: On Wednesday 09 Nov 2011, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: [snip] * The GPLv2 places no restrictions on what you can 'write', it only places restrictions on your distribution of things that you write that could be considered 'derivative works' of a

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 11/09/2011 04:37 AM, A J Stiles wrote: On Tuesday 08 November 2011, Yaroslav Panych wrote: Greetings I have found next paragraph in Licence file(source root) Digium, Inc. (formerly Linux Support Services) holds copyright and/or sufficient licenses to all components of the Asterisk package,

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Yaroslav Panych
I shall contact when(and if) decision will be made. But such decision cannot be made basing only on this paragraph, because it does not describes anything. There are no description of licensing procedure, nor pricing, nor liability, rights or freedoms(at least in general approximation) of sides.

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 11/09/2011 07:59 AM, Yaroslav Panych wrote: I shall contact when(and if) decision will be made. But such decision cannot be made basing only on this paragraph, because it does not describes anything. There are no description of licensing procedure, nor pricing, nor liability, rights or

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Raj Mathur (राज माथुर)
On Wednesday 09 Nov 2011, Yaroslav Panych wrote: I shall contact when(and if) decision will be made. But such decision cannot be made basing only on this paragraph, because it does not describes anything. There are no description of licensing procedure, nor pricing, nor liability, rights or

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread A J Stiles
On Wednesday 09 November 2011, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: On 11/09/2011 04:37 AM, I wrote: What you *can't* do is distribute your modules *as pre-compiled binaries* under any licence beside the GPL -- if they are distributed under any other licence, they *must* be compiled on-site by the end

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Richard Kenner
But so long as you were careful not to copy any of the code you are going to link against into your Source Code (and why would you, if you were linking against it?), it only *becomes* a derivative work *after* it has been compiled. That's not necessarily true because if you have a work that

Re: [asterisk-users] CallerID inconsistently presented through ISDN/cellular networks

2011-11-09 Thread Richard Mudgett
As promised, here is a follow up on my quest to get CallerID correctly presented when forwarding calls to cellphones. Here is a reminder of the issue at hand: Alice (GSM handset) calls Bob (ISDN-connected Asterisk extension) which forwards to Cory (GSM handset) What I

[asterisk-users] ConfBridge 1.6.20 user count

2011-11-09 Thread asterisk users
Hi all, I'm using ConfBridge within Asterisk 1.6.20 and want to record the conference, so I'd like to start the recording when the second user joins, so in the example below, for example, how can I get the current user count in ConfBridge 3000? [conferences] ;authenticated conference (ext

Re: [asterisk-users] CallerID inconsistently presented through ISDN/cellular networks

2011-11-09 Thread Olivier
2011/11/9 Richard Mudgett rmudg...@digium.com As promised, here is a follow up on my quest to get CallerID correctly presented when forwarding calls to cellphones. Here is a reminder of the issue at hand: Alice (GSM handset) calls Bob (ISDN-connected Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] CallerID inconsistently presented through ISDN/cellular networks

2011-11-09 Thread Richard Mudgett
2. As I feel specically new to this RDNIS concept, how should I set CALLERID(RDNIS), before or after Answer() statement ? It does not matter in this case. Asterisk v1.6.1 will keep both legs of the call anyway. If you ultimately want to get the call entirely off of your Asterisk

Re: [asterisk-users] ConfBridge 1.6.20 user count

2011-11-09 Thread Danny Nicholas
What about this? asterisk -rx core show function CONFBRIDGE_INFO -= Info about function 'CONFBRIDGE_INFO' =- [Synopsis] Get information about a ConfBridge conference. [Description] This function returns a non-negative integer for valid conference identifiers (0 or 1 for 'locked')

Re: [asterisk-users] ConfBridge 1.6.20 user count

2011-11-09 Thread asterisk users
Unfortunately, that function doesn't seem to be in 1.6.20, which Asterisk version are you using? *CLI core show function CONFBRIDGE_INFO No function by that name registered. Command 'core show function CONFBRIDGE_INFO' failed. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com

Re: [asterisk-users] ConfBridge 1.6.20 user count

2011-11-09 Thread Danny Nicholas
10.0.beta2. Have you tried confbridge(xxx,c)? This joins and announces count, but I don't know if it returns a variable. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of asterisk users Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [asterisk-users] ConfBridge 1.6.20 user count

2011-11-09 Thread asterisk users
confbridge(xxx,c) is a blocking call, so you can't get status back until that command completes. Time to upgrade to 10.0.beta2 I guess... On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: 10.0.beta2.  Have you tried confbridge(xxx,c)?  This joins and announces count,

Re: [asterisk-users] ConfBridge 1.6.20 user count

2011-11-09 Thread Danny Nicholas
What about a local call to confbridge(xxx,c)? -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of asterisk users Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 12:57 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

Re: [asterisk-users] Permanent sip and agi debug on?

2011-11-09 Thread David Cunningham
Kevin, Thank you very much! On 10 November 2011 00:15, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: On 11/09/2011 04:22 AM, David Cunningham wrote: Hi all, I can't find the answer to this via google - is there some way to permanently enable sip set debug on and agi set debug on in

Re: [asterisk-users] Permanent sip and agi debug on?

2011-11-09 Thread Danny Nicholas
If you have an ancient version of Asterisk you want to stick with, you can do this with asterisk -rx sip set debug on and asterisk -rx agi set debug on in your safe_asterisk script. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of

Re: [asterisk-users] State of Asterisk+Virtualization+Timing

2011-11-09 Thread Hans Witvliet
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 16:10 +0300, Anton Kvashenkin wrote: Is anybody using pci-passthrough? Yes, though quite a while ago. About three years ago, i used pci-passthrough to give a dom-U access to a localy mounted smartcard. But i have a vague feeling that you are up to something else... I know

Re: [asterisk-users] State of Asterisk+Virtualization+Timing

2011-11-09 Thread Nick Khamis
Smart card? I think we should be leaning more towards the network devices? Cheers, Nick. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Hans Witvliet aster...@a-domani.nl wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 16:10 +0300, Anton Kvashenkin wrote: Is anybody using pci-passthrough? Yes, though quite a while ago.

[asterisk-users] ayrv2by jg4yjbf3r

2011-11-09 Thread VoIP Carib
w1z7g0t, 2ck5wt7y6. http://au6vpf8so.blog.com/1d/ fyooxwq sl5pk8 8unmhkev, tudcx e5zxhd. 62ce7jtt 9ygow7phv8b. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

[asterisk-users] DTMF issue with 1.8.6.0 and SIP Trunks

2011-11-09 Thread JR Richardson
Hi All, I recently turned up some 1.8.6.0 call servers in productions, SIP trunks in routing calls to upstream carrier via SIP trunks out. I spent a lot of time in the lab testing 1.8 which included heavily testing DTMF with no issues that came up. It all just seemed to work fine. But then

Re: [asterisk-users] DTMF issue with 1.8.6.0 and SIP Trunks

2011-11-09 Thread Jared Geiger
I had similar problems with 1.8.6 and polycom phones intermittently having DTMF issues. I updated to 1.8.7 and things cleared up. I went through the release notes at the time, but don't recall which commit made me decide to give it a try. Rgds, Jared On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:03 PM, JR Richardson

[asterisk-users] IAX2 availability testing

2011-11-09 Thread Jaap Winius
Hi folks, What methods are available for testing IAX2 service availability? I know about iax2 show peers and iax2 show registry, but I'd like some alternatives. Tcpdump shows a little more about what's going on, but a handy test using nmap doesn't seem to work anymore (see

Re: [asterisk-users] 9. any live queue monitor recommendation? (Jean Chassoul) chass...@gmail.com

2011-11-09 Thread A.Rymkus
I would recommend you Monast (monitor asterisk), it's stable and gives alot of information. http://sourceforge.net/projects/monast/ WBR A.Rymkus 04.11.2011 13:34, Anthony Laudini ?: Hi Jean, I suggest Queuemetrics. There are many out there but this one is good for monitoring and