Just my opinion - Call Centers should be SIP trunked because IAX is more
prone to poor sound quality. IN MY SHOP (shouting to make the point that
I'm not speaking for all Asterisk installations), the IAX quality is at best
40-50% of a SIP connection.
_
From:
List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] High Volume Call Center SIP versus IAX2
Just my opinion - Call Centers should be SIP trunked because IAX is more prone
to poor sound quality. IN MY SHOP (shouting to make the point that I'm not
speaking for all Asterisk installations
On 21/10/09 9:52 AM, David Gibbons wrote:
snip
the IAX quality is at best 40-50% of a SIP connection.
/snip
How is this calculated?
:)
It's crap!
Assuming no packet loss, alaw is alaw.
If you add to that the fact you can reduce bandwidth with IAX trunking,
you may even get better sound
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] High Volume Call Center SIP versus IAX2
snip
the IAX quality is at best 40-50% of a SIP connection.
/snip
How is this calculated?
Thanks
Dave
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Robert Grignon wrote:
I wont say we are extremely high volume (40 concurrent calls) but I get
occasional complaints about quality.
Is IAX2 the way to go or would SIP trunking be better.
IAX gets my vote -- especially within the same shop.
One client maxes out at around
Easy to try, switch to sip for a day, see if the problems go away.
I think its worth to move to sip if you dont care about the bandwidth
and your router(s) can handle the extra packets /s
Zoa
Robert Grignon wrote:
I wont say we are extremely high volume (40 concurrent calls) but I
get
