Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting problem with IP's
Just a guess, but the connection probably went from full to half duplex. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Julian Lyndon-Smith Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 8:54 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Interesting problem with IP's Have a trunk 1.4 asterisk, running on centos on the lan at work. A long story, but we had the entire work network on a public address range (90.1.0.x), going to a firewall, then out to the net. At home (192.168.1.x network) I have a router that connects to the firewall via a vpn tunnel. All was great. My cisco 7960 (192.168.1.100) was able to register with the asterisk server on 90.1.0.76 - and there was no audio problems whatsoever. I also must stress that I had nat=no and no nat-specific flags set in asterisk. However,the day came where the techs decided that we should be on a private internal network, and moved all of the devices onto a 10.0.x.x internal network. Needless to say, it wasn't an easy task. Now, although my vpn is connected to the new network, and I can access all of the machine as I used to be able to, I now only have 1-way audio on my phone !! (I can hear, and it gets progressively worse,the other party cannot hear me) Why would this have changed ? Do I need to do nat stuff now ? and why ? Interesting. Julian ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting problem with IP's
snip Just a guess, but the connection probably went from full to half duplex. /snip Full vs. Half duplex networking would NOT cause half duplex phone calls. -Dave ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting problem with IP's
This probably isn't a good guess either, but could OP have just 5060 open and not the other ranges * needs to run the call? Since he has one-way connection, I'm guessing not... -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of David Gibbons Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 8:28 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting problem with IP's snip Just a guess, but the connection probably went from full to half duplex. /snip Full vs. Half duplex networking would NOT cause half duplex phone calls. -Dave ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting problem with IP's
HaHa!. That is so funny, made me splurt my coffee over the keyboard. lol Julian 2009/12/9 Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com: Just a guess, but the connection probably went from full to half duplex. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Julian Lyndon-Smith Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 8:54 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Interesting problem with IP's Have a trunk 1.4 asterisk, running on centos on the lan at work. A long story, but we had the entire work network on a public address range (90.1.0.x), going to a firewall, then out to the net. At home (192.168.1.x network) I have a router that connects to the firewall via a vpn tunnel. All was great. My cisco 7960 (192.168.1.100) was able to register with the asterisk server on 90.1.0.76 - and there was no audio problems whatsoever. I also must stress that I had nat=no and no nat-specific flags set in asterisk. However,the day came where the techs decided that we should be on a private internal network, and moved all of the devices onto a 10.0.x.x internal network. Needless to say, it wasn't an easy task. Now, although my vpn is connected to the new network, and I can access all of the machine as I used to be able to, I now only have 1-way audio on my phone !! (I can hear, and it gets progressively worse,the other party cannot hear me) Why would this have changed ? Do I need to do nat stuff now ? and why ? Interesting. Julian ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting problem with IP's
Don't forget that many routers treat the designated private address space differently because it assumes the device is being implemented as a border router. In this configuration they block most traffic unless you specifically set rules to permit traffic to flow. -dbc. ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
