Quote
We had a master source location.with a master image
We cloned the hard drive with linux dd copy of master image
Did the dd to clone it actually work on RAID devices
Mike Trest - On Travel wrote:
-Original Message-
I'd be interested in sections like Rolling
why yes, my rsync does that just fine, you must not be running
the latest version
Steve Edwards wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Bernd Felsche wrote:
Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm mainly interested in consistency in configuration. The method has
to be sophisticated enough
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:39:39PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
I'm in the midst of rearranging things (which are 2 to 3 times as large
as they were then); I'll update that once I'm done.
Double-plus cool.
I'd be interested in sections like Rolling out a new server or How we
maintain
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:02:26AM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it may be based on my ignorance :)
Can rsync mung a stanza from iax.conf like:
why yes, my rsync does that just fine, you must not be running
the latest version
April Fools Day was 2
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:39:39PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
The shell script approach has the advantage of light weight. I do a
minimal Centos 5 install and wget a single script which does everything
-- configures the network,
: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk really good??
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:40:44PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:11:45PM -0700, Eugen Soare wrote:
That was cool!
thanks
-Original Message-
I'd be interested in sections like Rolling out a new server or How we
maintain all the little configuration files without losing our sanity.
Hi,
I will contribute my 2-cents on how I maintained consistency on a
large application
with 64 + Asterisks that all
I'm glad so much has been sent about on the thread I create (bloated
ego head :) ) It has gotten my curiosity up.
What is VICIDIAL?
Is it Public Domain?
Pay for Software?
What's it all about? (not looking for all the features, maybe I should
put my understanding of it's functions and people
On 4/14/08, Eugen Soare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad so much has been sent about on the thread I create (bloated ego
head :) ) It has gotten my curiosity up.
What is VICIDIAL?
Is it Public Domain?
Pay for Software?
What's it all about? (not looking for all the features, maybe I
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:08:21AM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
The idea behind the script is to create a very simple hot-spare
solution where all you have to do to replace a running machine is
change the IP address of the spare server and un-tar/gz the file on a
base-installed system and it
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:54:22PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
With VICIDIAL you can do inbound/outbound/blended call handling and
there are all sorts of features for call handling and agent functions.
The latest VICIDIAL release is GPLv2, but for future major releases we
are moving to the
Matt.
Thanks for the reply and Link. That should get me started looking
at that. Unfortunately, coming from the Nortel world. It may take some
time to get up to speed on things. The hardest part (as I see it) is
getting hardware/software instructions on setting up and then maybe
connecting
On 4/14/08, Eugen Soare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt.
Thanks for the reply and Link. That should get me started looking at
that. Unfortunately, coming from the Nortel world. It may take some time to
get up to speed on things. The hardest part (as I see it) is getting
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:54:22PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
With VICIDIAL you can do inbound/outbound/blended call handling and
there are all sorts of features for call handling and agent functions.
The latest VICIDIAL release is
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:48:38PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
Ah yes, my monster SCRATCH_INSTALL document :)
And (why the hell *not* stick my neck out :-) I'm planning some work
on the wiki to merge that and the newer documentation from SVN into
sort of an Administrator's Manual in the next, oh,
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:47:12PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:54:22PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
With VICIDIAL you can do inbound/outbound/blended call
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:47:12PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:54:22PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
With VICIDIAL you can do inbound/outbound/blended call handling and
there are all sorts of features for call
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:24:02PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
As for contributed code, we require a statement of this is my code
and the project can use it and redistribute it from the author.
Nothing very detailed at the moment because there are not many code
contributors and the
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:24:02PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
As for contributed code, we require a statement of this is my code
and the project can use it and redistribute it from the author.
Nothing very detailed at the
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Mark Hamilton wrote:
Is this 'shell script' on the public domain? As it sounds really useful. :)
You're welcome to it. I'll reply with a link off-list. The script is
definitely a work-in-progress and not quite ready for prime-time.
Thanks in advance,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:40:44PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:11:45PM -0700, Eugen Soare wrote:
That was cool!
thanks for the pdf.
I'm in the midst of rearranging things (which are 2 to 3 times as large
as
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:40:44PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:11:45PM -0700, Eugen Soare wrote:
That was cool!
thanks for the pdf.
I'm in the midst of rearranging
Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 01:40:44PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
I'd be interested in sections like Rolling out a new server or How we
maintain all the little configuration files without losing our sanity.
I
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Bernd Felsche wrote:
Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm mainly interested in consistency in configuration. The method has
to be sophisticated enough to handle this box has 2 Ethernet interfaces
so I should configure OpenSER and Asterisk to listen to both IP
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:11:45PM -0700, Eugen Soare wrote:
That was cool!
thanks for the pdf.
I'm in the midst of rearranging things (which are 2 to 3 times as large
as they were then); I'll update that once I'm done.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:11:45PM -0700, Eugen Soare wrote:
That was cool!
thanks for the pdf.
I'm in the midst of rearranging things (which are 2 to 3 times as large
as they were then); I'll update that once I'm done.
Double-plus cool.
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:46:48 -0700, Eugen Soare
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So this is just a general question, Is Asterisk really good?
Yes, but you should also look at an alternative that used Asterisk as
a reference (www.freeswitch.org), and make an informed decision.
I am looking at that. hmm... what to do... don't want any regrets you
know! :)
thanks,
es
Vincent wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:46:48 -0700, Eugen Soare
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So this is just a general question, Is Asterisk really good?
Yes, but you should also look
On 4/10/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 05:49:26PM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Please share more about this.
What/How are you clustering the boxes ?
Is this all VOIP or TDMF front and VOIP for agents in back ?
What kind of Boxes ? What O/S
wow!
That was cool!
thanks for the pdf.
es
Matt Florell wrote:
On 4/10/08, Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 05:49:26PM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Please share more about this.
What/How are you "clustering" the boxes ?
Is this all VOIP
Hi Eugene,
Yes it's that good.
All the functionality you posted is possible.
Regarding your international calls, nothing more is required than two
asterisk servers (one at each location) and a broadband connection -
cards are only used to connect into pstn or isdn.
Why don't you start with a
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Eugen Soare wrote:
1 - Can you really make free outgoing calls from let's say Portland OR,
to Frankfurt Germany?
No. There is no free lunch. It takes electricity, bandwidth, and depending
on who you want to call in Germany, termination.
Thanks in advance,
On Thursday 10 April 2008 02:14:17 pm Steve Edwards wrote:
1 - Can you really make free outgoing calls from let's say Portland OR,
to Frankfurt Germany?
No. There is no free lunch. It takes electricity, bandwidth, and depending
on who you want to call in Germany, termination.
though you
Steve Edwards wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Eugen Soare wrote:
1 - Can you really make free outgoing calls from let's say Portland OR,
to Frankfurt Germany?
No. There is no free lunch. It takes electricity, bandwidth, and depending
on who you want to call in Germany, termination.
Yep.
-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Is Asterisk really good??
Hi Eugene,
Yes it's that good.
All the functionality you posted is possible.
Regarding your international calls, nothing more is required than two
asterisk servers
(one at each location) and a broadband connection
Remember - True TELCO grade systems simply cannot be compared to
anything else.
You want the reliability , uptime, and all the bells and whistles of
true Carrier Grade Hardware/Software
then you pay for it. If you want something you can tinker under the
hood with and do some cool
stuff with,
Asterisk as a PBX is fantastic. It offers the features found in the most
sophisticated traditional
Until now the third party PBX configuration software has not had the
sophistication of
Asterisk product itself. Check out cogoblue.com It is a visual drag and
drop configuration tool that
is
On Thursday 10 April 2008 15:43:33 John Signorello wrote:
Asterisk as a PBX is fantastic. It offers the features found in the most
sophisticated traditional
Until now the third party PBX configuration software has not had the
sophistication of
Asterisk product itself. Check out cogoblue.com
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:05:47PM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Remember - True TELCO grade systems simply cannot be compared to
anything else. You want the reliability , uptime, and all the bells
and whistles of true Carrier Grade Hardware/Software then you pay for
it. If you want something you can
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 16:05 -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Remember - True TELCO grade systems simply cannot be compared to
anything else.
You want the reliability , uptime, and all the bells and whistles of
true Carrier Grade Hardware/Software
then you pay for it. If you want something you can
Quote
And for what it's worth, at my new job I babysit about a 16-machine
cluster running VICIdial for close to 200 agents, and by and large, it
just runs. It's got about 20 T-1s feeding it
Please share more about this.
What/How are you clustering the boxes ?
Is this all VOIP or TDMF front
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 05:49:26PM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
Please share more about this.
What/How are you clustering the boxes ?
Is this all VOIP or TDMF front and VOIP for agents in back ?
What kind of Boxes ? What O/S
What tools are you using to monitor this big-azz mother ?
42 matches
Mail list logo
