Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread A J Stiles
On Tuesday 08 November 2011, Yaroslav Panych wrote: Greetings I have found next paragraph in Licence file(source root) Digium, Inc. (formerly Linux Support Services) holds copyright and/or sufficient licenses to all components of the Asterisk package, and therefore can grant, at its sole

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 11/09/2011 04:37 AM, A J Stiles wrote: On Tuesday 08 November 2011, Yaroslav Panych wrote: Greetings I have found next paragraph in Licence file(source root) Digium, Inc. (formerly Linux Support Services) holds copyright and/or sufficient licenses to all components of the Asterisk package,

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Yaroslav Panych
I shall contact when(and if) decision will be made. But such decision cannot be made basing only on this paragraph, because it does not describes anything. There are no description of licensing procedure, nor pricing, nor liability, rights or freedoms(at least in general approximation) of sides.

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 11/09/2011 07:59 AM, Yaroslav Panych wrote: I shall contact when(and if) decision will be made. But such decision cannot be made basing only on this paragraph, because it does not describes anything. There are no description of licensing procedure, nor pricing, nor liability, rights or

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Raj Mathur (राज माथुर)
On Wednesday 09 Nov 2011, Yaroslav Panych wrote: I shall contact when(and if) decision will be made. But such decision cannot be made basing only on this paragraph, because it does not describes anything. There are no description of licensing procedure, nor pricing, nor liability, rights or

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread A J Stiles
On Wednesday 09 November 2011, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: On 11/09/2011 04:37 AM, I wrote: What you *can't* do is distribute your modules *as pre-compiled binaries* under any licence beside the GPL -- if they are distributed under any other licence, they *must* be compiled on-site by the end

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-09 Thread Richard Kenner
But so long as you were careful not to copy any of the code you are going to link against into your Source Code (and why would you, if you were linking against it?), it only *becomes* a derivative work *after* it has been compiled. That's not necessarily true because if you have a work that

Re: [asterisk-users] Licensing question.

2011-11-08 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 11/08/2011 04:47 PM, Yaroslav Panych wrote: Greetings I have found next paragraph in Licence file(source root) Digium, Inc. (formerly Linux Support Services) holds copyright and/or sufficient licenses to all components of the Asterisk package, and therefore can grant, at its sole discretion,